Crafts and generates professional conventional commit messages following Angular/Conventional Commits format. Use when committing changes, writing git commit messages, or when user mentions commit message.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Generates commit messages following the Conventional Commits / Angular convention for clear, consistent version history.
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
[optional body]
[optional footer]
| Type | Use |
|---|---|
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
docs | Documentation only changes |
style | Formatting, whitespace, no logic change |
refactor | Neither fix nor feature |
perf | Performance improvement |
test | Adding or updating tests |
build | Build system or external dependencies |
ci | CI/CD configuration changes |
chore | Other maintenance tasks |
revert | Reverting a previous commit |
feat(auth), fix(api), docs(readme), refactor(core).BREAKING CHANGE: …, Closes #N, Co-Authored-By: … (HUMAN co-authors only — Co-Authored-By: Claude … trailers are hard-blocked by .claude/hooks/validate-commit.cjs, v1.49.621 policy).One logical change per commit. Split unrelated changes into separate commits — this makes surgical rollback and git bisect possible.
Simple feature:
feat(auth): add password reset functionality
Bug fix with issue reference:
fix(api): handle null response from user endpoint
The /users/:id endpoint could return null for deleted users,
causing a crash in the profile component.
Closes #456
Breaking change:
feat(api): change authentication to JWT
Migrate from session-based auth to JWT tokens for better
scalability and stateless operation.
BREAKING CHANGE: All API clients must now include JWT token
in Authorization header. Session cookies no longer accepted.
Documentation update:
docs(readme): update installation instructions
Add troubleshooting section for common npm issues
and clarify Node.js version requirements.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Provides web accessibility best practices for semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and screen reader patterns. Use when building UI components, reviewing accessibility, or when user mentions 'a11y', 'accessibility', 'ARIA', 'screen reader', 'keyboard navigation', 'WCAG'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Active listening techniques for effective communication. Covers attending behaviors, paraphrasing, reflective listening, clarifying questions, empathic response, barriers to listening, listening in conflict, and cross-cultural listening. Use when building listening skills, improving understanding in conversation, mediating disputes, or analyzing communication breakdowns.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Adversarial spec-compliance PR review — cross-references diffs against approved specs, verifies runtime claims against source, detects competing PRs, audits scope/convention compliance. Use before merging.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Provides best practices for AI agent orchestration including MCP servers, A2A protocol, multi-agent coordination, and swarm architectures. Use when designing agent systems, configuring MCP servers, setting up agent teams, or when user mentions 'MCP', 'A2A', 'agent orchestration', 'multi-agent', 'swarm', 'agent team', 'LangGraph', 'CrewAI', 'AutoGen'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Symbolic manipulation, equation solving, and algebraic structures for mathematical reasoning. Covers distributive law, factoring, completing the square, linear through polynomial equation solving, systems of equations (substitution, elimination, Gaussian elimination, matrix methods), algebraic structures (groups, rings, fields), modular arithmetic, polynomial theory, and inequalities. Use when solving equations, simplifying expressions, working with algebraic structures, or performing symbolic manipulation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Understanding how algorithmic systems shape what users see, know, and do -- from recommendation feeds to search ranking to credit scoring to hiring software. Covers the mechanics of recommendation systems, algorithmic bias and its sources, personalization's effects on information diets, opacity and accountability, AI limitations (hallucination, confident wrongness), and the human-in-the-loop question. Use when a learner needs to think critically about why particular content reached them.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。