跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

finalize

Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to "finalize implementation", "finalize changes", "wrap up implementation", "finish up", "ready to commit", or "run QA workflow".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Finalize Implementation

Post-implementation QA workflow: tests, code polishing, commit, and self-improvement.

Task Tracking

At the start, use TaskCreate to create a task for each phase:

  1. Run /polish-code skill
  2. Run /simplify-docs skill
  3. Run /update-changelog skill
  4. Run /self-improve skill
  5. Ship It

Phase 1: Run /polish-code Skill

Run the /polish-code skill for the current changes.

Phase 2: Run /simplify-docs Skill

Run the /simplify-docs skill on the staged changes (git diff --cached). Stage any edits it makes before continuing.

Phase 3: Run /update-changelog Skill

Run the /update-changelog skill. Stage any edits it makes before continuing.

Phase 4: Run /self-improve Skill

Run the /self-improve skill for the current session. Always run this phase even if the session seemed routine.

Phase 5: Ship It

Step 1: Analyze Split

Examine the staged changes and evaluate whether they form a single reviewable unit or several independently reviewable units. This step decides only whether to split; the chosen ship skill owns all repository-state detection and the commit, push, branch, and PR intent.

Run git diff --cached --stat and git diff --cached to understand the scope. Categorize changes along three dimensions:

  • Concern type: refactoring, bug fix, new feature, cleanup, dependency update
  • Layer/domain: backend, frontend, database migrations, i18n, tests, configuration
  • Logical unit: files that form a coherent, independently reviewable change

A split is warranted when the staged changes contain multiple reviewable units. Each unit should be independently understandable, testable, and revertable. When deciding group boundaries, consider whether a reviewer could evaluate each group without needing context from the others.

Step 2: Present Analysis and Choose Path

Output the split analysis as text.

If changes form a single cohesive unit, note this and run the /ship skill.

If changes span multiple reviewable units, propose an ordered list of groups. For each group, specify:

  • Name and one-line description
  • File list (flag files with mixed-concern hunks)
  • Dependencies: which earlier groups, if any, this group builds on

Use AskUserQuestion to let the user choose whether to ship the changes together or split them up.

  • Ship together — ship all staged changes as one unit; run the /ship skill
  • Split up — ship each group as its own unit; run the /split-and-ship skill

Then use the TaskList tool and proceed to any remaining task.

Rules

  • Diff size, number of files changed, passing tests, perceived user urgency, or context window concerns are not reasons to skip a phase. Each phase does work beyond what those signals cover. "The session was long" or "a prior phase was thorough" are never valid reasons to skip a later phase.
  • Never stage or commit files containing secrets (.env, credentials, API keys). Warn if detected.
  • Do not present diffs to the user — the user reviews diffs in an external git client. Use git diff internally as needed.
  • If a non-test step fails (polish, review), stop and report the failure. Do not skip ahead.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to "apply findings", "apply fixes", "apply suggestions", "apply accepted findings", "fix the findings", or "apply the review results".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tobihagemann/turbo4152026年10月21日 更新

Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the user approves, delete the consumed handoffs, commit and push, and update the installed Turbo skills. Use when the user asks to "read .turbo/handoff and let me know what you think", "read the handoff files and let me know what you think", "review the lesson handoffs", "apply the self-improve handoffs", or "process the turbo handoffs".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tobihagemann/turbo4152026年10月21日 更新

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot, and low-value tests. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", "what's our worst code", "find low-value tests", or "which tests can we delete". Analysis-only — does not modify code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tobihagemann/turbo4152026年10月21日 更新

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tobihagemann/turbo4152026年10月21日 更新

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by $create-changelog and $update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tobihagemann/turbo4152026年10月21日 更新

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tobihagemann/turbo4152026年10月21日 更新

查看 tobihagemann 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题