Explain a GitHub pull request as an English Markdown walkthrough and return a Plannotator share link. Use for PR explanations, walkthroughs, or review preparation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Entity-aware code change analysis using the pi-sem tools. Use when the user asks what changed, wants blast radius or affected tests, needs focused context for a function/class, wants review help on a commit/branch/PR, or asks to compare semantic diff with raw git diff. Prefer sem_context and sem_impact; use sem_diff selectively for summaries and reviews.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use the pi-sem tools as a semantic lens, not as a universal replacement for raw git diff.
Choose the smallest useful tool first:
Focused understanding of one entity → sem_context
Blast radius / affected tests / hidden dependents → sem_impact
scope=tests for test selectionscope=all when validating broader impactStructural inventory of a file → sem_entities
What changed across a commit/range/working tree → sem_diff
History / ownership of an entity → sem_log, sem_blame
For commit / branch / PR review:
sem_diff once for a semantic overviewsem_impact on those entitiessem_context on the suspicious ones you need to understand deeplygit diff, read, or direct file inspection before citing line numbersFor snapshot / folder review:
sem_entitiessem_context on the most relevant entitiessem_impact only after you identify something suspicioussem diff --format json is not always smaller than raw git diffsem may under-cover tests, assets, generated files, or non-semantic glue codesem output alone as final evidence for line-level review commentsgit diff, read, grep, and file inspectionsem_diffsem_impact with scope=testssem_contextsem_entitiessem_logAvoid these habits:
sem_diff repeatedly when sem_context would answer the question fastergit diff for entity counts or blast radius questionssem_impact as infallible; verify surprising results with file reads and grep还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Explain a GitHub pull request as an English Markdown walkthrough and return a Plannotator share link. Use for PR explanations, walkthroughs, or review preparation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review, triage, and resolve PR review comments. Use when user asks to check PR comments, address review feedback, fix issues raised in review, reply to reviewers, or resolve review threads.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Codify project review rules as deterministic guards — ast-grep structural rules (with TDD-style rule tests) for mechanical checks, REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md for qualitative ones, wired into the project gate / wf verify. Use when the user wants to define review rules, turn a repeated review finding into a lint/guard, or set up ast-grep in a project.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Vytvoř workflow kontrakt z dosavadní diskuse — zapíše ~/Workspace/specs/<projekt>/<název>/contract.md (české tělo + strojový frontmatter) a zlintuje ho wf-gate. Použij, když uživatel řekne /wf nebo chce z probraného problému udělat kontrakt. Nikdy neimplementuje.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
České vysvětlení změny kódu z kontraktu, ref range nebo PR — pozadí, intuice, průchod kódem, důkazy, UAT a kvíz. Volá wf-impl po UAT nebo uživatel ručně.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dirigent jednoho workflow kontraktu ve svém super.engineering worktree — deleguje implementaci na subagenta, mezi fázemi pouští wf-gate, review předá skill wf-review, otevře draft PR (guardovaný), vyřeší komentáře, spustí UAT. Použij, když task session říká, že se má kontrakt provést přes wf-impl.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。