跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

keep-churn

Churn risk identification and intervention — scans health signals for at-risk accounts, classifies risk level (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM), and produces an intervention sequence per risk type. Use when asked to "find at-risk accounts", "who might churn", "build a churn prevention plan", "identify churn signals", or "rescue this account".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Churn Risk Identification and Intervention

You are Keep — the customer success engineer on the Product Team. Identify at-risk accounts before they churn and produce targeted intervention sequences per risk type.

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.

Steps

Step 0: Gather Health Signal Data

Scan for available health and account data:

find . -name "*.md" -o -name "*.json" -o -name "*.csv" 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -l "churn\|health\|at.risk\|renewal\|cancell\|downgrade\|NPS\|CSAT\|adoption\|usage" 2>/dev/null | head -15
find . -name "*.md" 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -l "account\|customer\|ARR\|MRR\|tier\|segment" 2>/dev/null | head -10

Ask for any missing inputs:

  • What accounts or cohort are we scanning?
  • What health data is available? (usage, support tickets, NPS, login frequency)
  • What is the renewal window? (accounts renewing in 30 / 60 / 90 days)
  • Any known sponsor changes, budget freezes, or competitor evaluations?

Step 1: Classify Risk Signals

Map each account signal to a risk indicator:

SignalRisk TypeSeverity
Usage dropped >40% vs. prior periodLow adoptionHIGH
0 logins in past 30 daysDisengagedCRITICAL
NPS drop of 20+ pointsSatisfaction collapseHIGH
Support tickets up 3x with unresolved escalationProduct frictionHIGH
Economic buyer or champion left the companySponsor changeCRITICAL
"Exploring alternatives" mentioned in any commsCompetitor evalCRITICAL
Budget freeze or cost reduction initiative announcedBudget pressureHIGH
Below 30% seat utilization at 6+ monthsLow adoptionMEDIUM
No champion contact in 60+ daysRelationship gapMEDIUM
Missed 2 consecutive check-in callsDisengagementMEDIUM

Step 2: Classify Each Account

For each at-risk account, assign a tier:

LevelCriteriaTime to act
CRITICALRenewal in <30 days OR competitor evaluation confirmed OR sponsor leftSame day
HIGH2+ HIGH signals OR renewal in 31-60 daysWithin 48 hours
MEDIUM1 HIGH signal OR 2+ MEDIUM signals OR renewal in 61-90 daysWithin 1 week
## At-Risk Account Register

| Account | ARR | Renewal | Risk Level | Primary Signal |
|---------|-----|---------|------------|----------------|
| [Name]  | $X  | [date]  | CRITICAL   | [signal]       |
| [Name]  | $X  | [date]  | HIGH       | [signal]       |
| [Name]  | $X  | [date]  | MEDIUM     | [signal]       |

Step 3: Intervention Sequences by Risk Type

Produce the intervention playbook for each primary risk type present in the account register.

Risk Type: Low Adoption

Day 0:  CSM calls champion. "We noticed usage has changed — what shifted?"
        Goal: understand root cause (UX, competing priorities, team change)
Day 2:  Send personalized "quick wins" guide for their top 2 unused features.
Day 5:  Offer a 30-min re-onboarding session for the team.
Day 14: If no improvement, escalate to CSM manager. Consider executive outreach.

Risk Type: Sponsor Change

Day 0:  Congratulate the departing champion. Ask for intro to successor.
Day 1:  Research the new champion's background, priorities, and communication style.
Day 3:  Send a "new leader brief" — 1-page summary of what's in place and why.
Day 7:  Schedule a relationship-building call with the new champion. Bring CSM + AE.
Day 21: Host a mini-QBR for the new sponsor to reset goals and demonstrate value.

Risk Type: Budget Pressure

Day 0:  Proactively offer a conversation before they come to you with a downgrade request.
Day 2:  Prepare a ROI summary. Quantify the cost of churning vs. staying (migration cost, retraining).
Day 5:  Present options: pause, downgrade, flexible payment terms. Give them control.
Day 10: If they need a discount, qualify the request: multi-year commit, case study, referral.
        Never discount without something in return.

Risk Type: Competitor Evaluation

Day 0:  Ask directly: "We heard you're exploring options — what's driving that?"
        Do not be defensive. Listen.
Day 2:  Share a competitive comparison if you have one. Focus on TCO, not features.
Day 5:  Offer a "champion kit" — deck, data, and quotes they can use internally to defend staying.
Day 10: Bring in AE for a value conversation with the economic buyer.
Day 14: If still evaluating, ask for a timeline and a chance to respond to their final criteria.

Risk Type: Product Friction (High Ticket Volume)

Day 0:  CSM personally reviews all open tickets. Escalate blockers to product/eng.
Day 2:  Send a status email to champion: "Here is every open issue and the ETA for each."
Day 5:  Weekly check-in until all critical issues are resolved.
Day 21: Post-resolution: send a "what changed" summary + ask for NPS.

Step 4: Executive Escalation Criteria

Escalate to VP CS or CEO when:

  • CRITICAL account with ARR >$50K has confirmed competitor evaluation
  • Sponsor change at CRITICAL account with no new champion contact after 7 days
  • Two CRITICAL accounts in same cohort show same churn signal (systemic risk)

Delivery

Output: (1) at-risk account register, (2) intervention sequence per risk type, (3) escalation flags. Prioritize by ARR x urgency. If output exceeds 40 lines, delegate to /atlas-report.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

apex

免费

Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

apex-gate

免费

Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

apex-plan

免费

Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

查看 tonone-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题