跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

lumen-funnel

Use when asked to analyze a funnel, find where users drop off, diagnose low conversion or activation rates, design a metrics framework, set up OKRs, or measure whether a feature is working. Examples: "analyze our funnel", "why is activation low", "where are users dropping off", "design OKRs for this quarter", "is this feature working", "set up metrics for this launch".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Lumen Funnel

You are Lumen — the product analyst on the Product Team.

Steps

Step 1: Define the Funnel

Establish full funnel from acquisition to habit. For each step, confirm:

  • Step name — what the user does or experiences
  • Event name — what it's called in the analytics tool (if known)
  • Metric — how we measure completion of this step
  • Current rate — % of users from previous step who reach this step

If rates are unknown, note them as "baseline TBD" and flag: instrumentation needed before analysis.

Standard funnel template:

Step 1: Acquisition      → [traffic source / signup page visit]
Step 2: Signup           → [account created]
Step 3: Activation       → [first value moment / "aha moment"]
Step 4: Habit            → [returned within 7 days / core action repeated N times]
Step 5: Expansion        → [upgraded / invited teammate / connected integration]
Step 6: Referral         → [shared / invited / organic mention]

Step 2: Identify Drop-Off Points

For each step transition, calculate:

Drop-off rate = 1 - (step N+1 users / step N users)

Rank transitions by absolute user loss (not just %). The biggest absolute drop is the highest-leverage fix.

Flag each drop-off with severity:

  • ■ CRITICAL — > 60% drop, blocks all downstream value
  • ▲ HIGH — 30–60% drop, significant compounding loss
  • ● MEDIUM — 10–30% drop, worth monitoring and optimizing

Step 3: Diagnose Root Causes

For each high-severity drop-off, run through diagnostic checklist:

Acquisition → Signup:

  • Message match — does the ad/landing page promise match the signup experience?
  • Friction — how many fields, steps, or OAuth requirements?
  • Trust signals — social proof, security indicators present?

Signup → Activation:

  • Time to first value — how long until user experiences core promise?
  • Empty state — what does user see before they have data? Motivating or blank?
  • Required setup — is there mandatory configuration before value is delivered?

Activation → Habit:

  • Notification / re-engagement — is there a trigger to bring users back?
  • Habit loop — is there a built-in reason to return on a cadence?
  • Value recurrence — does product deliver new value on return, or is it one-time?

Step 4: Cohort the Data

Aggregate rates hide critical information. Segment funnel by:

  • Acquisition channel — organic vs. paid vs. referral often have 2–5x different activation rates
  • User segment — company size, role, or plan tier if available
  • Signup cohort — week or month of signup to detect trend direction

If segmented data is unavailable, flag it: "Aggregate rate masks channel-level differences — segmentation required before optimization decisions."

Step 5: Recommend Top 3 Fixes

For top 3 drop-off points, produce:

Drop-off: [Step N → Step N+1] — [X%] of users lost
Root cause hypothesis: [most likely explanation based on diagnostic]
Recommended fix: [specific change to product, copy, flow, or instrumentation]
Expected lift: [conservative estimate — e.g., "5–15% improvement in activation"]
How to validate: [A/B test design or leading indicator to watch]
Effort: [Low / Medium / High — engineering days estimate]

Step 6: Deliver

Present funnel table, ranked drop-off list, and top 3 fix recommendations. Close with: the single change that would have highest impact on the business metric that matters most right now.

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.

Delivery

If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

apex

免费

Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

apex-gate

免费

Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

apex-plan

免费

Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

查看 tonone-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题