跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

modern-cpp

Write or modernize C++ with guidance on C++20, C++23, and C++26 features. Review memory ownership, error handling, and template constraints, with recommendations for compiler protections and runtime checks that detect bugs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Guides C++ code toward modern idioms (C++20/23/26). Use when writing new C++ code, modernizing legacy patterns, or working on security-critical C++. Replaces raw pointers with smart pointers, SFINAE with concepts, printf with std::print, error codes with std::expected.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Modernize legacy C++ patterns
  • Choose approaches for new C++ code
  • Review memory ownership and error handling
  • Review compiler protections for security-sensitive code

包含的文件(7)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB
  • references/anti-patterns.md5.5 KB
  • references/compiler-hardening.md7.3 KB
  • references/cpp20-features.md7.0 KB
  • references/cpp23-features.md7.0 KB
  • references/cpp26-features.md7.5 KB
  • references/safe-idioms.md8.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Modern C++

Guide for writing modern C++ using C++20, C++23, and C++26 idioms. Focuses on patterns that eliminate vulnerability classes and reduce boilerplate, with a security emphasis from Trail of Bits.

When to Use This Skill

  • Writing new C++ functions, classes, or libraries
  • Modernizing existing C++ code (pre-C++20 patterns)
  • Choosing between legacy and modern approaches
  • Working on security-critical or safety-sensitive C++
  • Reviewing C++ code for modern idiom adoption

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • User explicitly requires older standard: Respect constraints (embedded, legacy ABI)
  • Pure C code: This skill is C++-specific
  • Build system questions: CMake, Meson, Bazel configuration is out of scope
  • Non-C++ projects: Mixed codebases where C++ isn't primary

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

AvoidUse InsteadWhy
new/deletestd::make_unique, std::make_sharedEliminates leaks, double-free
Raw owning pointersstd::unique_ptr, std::shared_ptrRAII ownership semantics
C arrays (int arr[N])std::array<int, N>Bounds-aware, value semantics
Pointer + length paramsstd::span<T>Non-owning, bounds-checkable
printf / sprintfstd::format, std::printType-safe, no buffer overflow
C-style casts (int)xstatic_cast<int>(x)Explicit intent, auditable
#define constantsconstexpr variablesScoped, typed, debuggable
SFINAE / enable_ifConcepts + requiresReadable constraints and errors
Error codes + out paramsstd::expected<T, E>Composable, type-safe errors
unionstd::variantType-safe, no silent UB
Raw mutex.lock()/unlock()std::scoped_lockException-safe, no deadlocks
std::threadstd::jthreadAuto-join, stop token support
assert() macrocontract_assert (C++26)Visible to tooling, configurable
Manual CRTPDeducing this (C++23)Simpler, no template boilerplate
Macro code generationReflection (C++26)Zero-overhead, composable

See anti-patterns.md for the full table (30+ patterns).

Decision Tree

What are you doing?
|
+-- Writing new C++ code?
|   +-- Use modern idioms by default (C++20/23)
|   +-- Choose the newest standard your compiler supports
|   +-- See Feature Tiers below
|
+-- Modernizing existing code?
|   +-- Start with Tier 1 (C++20/23) replacements
|   +-- Prioritize by security impact (memory > types > style)
|   +-- See anti-patterns.md for the migration table
|
+-- Security-critical code?
|   +-- Enable compiler hardening flags (see below)
|   +-- Enable hardened libc++ mode
|   +-- Run sanitizers in CI
|   +-- See safe-idioms.md and compiler-hardening.md
|
+-- Using C++26 features?
    +-- Reflection: YES, plan for it (GCC 16+)
    +-- Contracts: cautiously, for new API boundaries
    +-- std::execution: wait for ecosystem maturity
    +-- See cpp26-features.md

Feature Tiers

Features are ranked by practical usability today, not by standard version.

Tier 1: Use Today (C++20/23, solid compiler support)

FeatureReplacesStandard
Concepts + requiresSFINAE, enable_ifC++20
Ranges + viewsRaw iterator loopsC++20
std::span<T>Pointer + lengthC++20
std::formatsprintf, iostream chainsC++20
Three-way comparison <=>Manual comparison operatorsC++20
std::jthreadstd::thread + manual joinC++20
Designated initializersPositional struct initC++20
std::expected<T,E>Error codes, exceptions at boundariesC++23
std::print / std::printlnprintf, std::cout <<C++23
Deducing thisCRTP, const/non-const duplicationC++23
std::flat_mapstd::map for read-heavy useC++23
Monadic std::optionalNested if-checks on optionalsC++23

See cpp20-features.md and cpp23-features.md.

Tier 2: Deploy Now (no standard bump needed)

These improve safety without changing your C++ standard version:

  • Compiler hardening flags — -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3, -fstack-protector-strong, -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
  • Hardened libc++ — -D_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE=_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_FAST for ~0.3% overhead bounds-checking
  • Sanitizers in CI — ASan + UBSan as minimum; TSan for concurrent code
  • Warning flags — -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Werror

See compiler-hardening.md.

Tier 3: Plan For (C++26, worth restructuring around)

Reflection is the single most transformative C++26 feature. It eliminates:

  • Serialization boilerplate (one generic function replaces per-struct to_json)
  • Code generators (protobuf codegen, Qt MOC)
  • Macro-based registration and enum-to-string hacks

GCC 16 (April 2026) has reflection merged. Plan new code to benefit from it.

Tier 4: Watch (C++26, needs maturation)

  • Contracts (pre/post/contract_assert) — Better than assert(), but no virtual function support and limited compiler support. Adopt cautiously for new API boundaries.
  • std::execution (senders/receivers) — Powerful async framework, but steep learning curve, no scheduler ships with it, and poor documentation. Wait for ecosystem maturity.

See cpp26-features.md.

Compiler Hardening Quick Reference

Essential Flags (GCC + Clang)

-Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Werror
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3
-fstack-protector-strong
-fstack-clash-protection
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
-fPIE -pie
-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now

Clang-Specific

-Wunsafe-buffer-usage

Hardened libc++ (Clang/libc++ only)

-D_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE=_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE_FAST

Google deployed this across Chrome and their server fleet: ~0.3% overhead, 1000+ bugs found, 30% reduction in production segfaults.

See compiler-hardening.md for the full guide.

Rationalizations to Reject

RationalizationWhy It's Wrong
"It compiles without warnings"Warnings depend on which flags you enable. Add -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic.
"ASan is too slow for production"Use GWP-ASan for sampling-based production detection (~0% overhead).
"We only use safe containers"Iterator invalidation and unchecked optional access are still exploitable.
"Smart pointers are slower"std::unique_ptr has zero overhead vs raw pointers. Measure before claiming.
"Our code doesn't have memory bugs"Google found 1000+ bugs when enabling hardened libc++. So did everyone else.
"C++26 features aren't available yet"C++20/23 features are. Hardening flags work on any standard. Start there.
"Modern C++ is harder to read"std::expected is more readable than checking error codes across 5 out-params.

Best Practices Checklist

  • Use smart pointers for ownership, raw pointers only for non-owning observation
  • Prefer std::span over pointer + length for function parameters
  • Use std::expected for functions that can fail with typed errors
  • Constrain templates with concepts, not SFINAE
  • Enable compiler hardening flags and hardened libc++ in all builds
  • Run ASan + UBSan in CI; add TSan for concurrent code
  • Use constexpr / consteval where possible (UB-free by design)
  • Mark functions [[nodiscard]] when ignoring the return value is likely a bug
  • Prefer value semantics; use std::variant over union, enum class over enum
  • Initialize all variables at declaration

Read Next

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Build and test code with AddressSanitizer, a tool that detects invalid memory access during execution. Configure checks for C/C++ and unsafe Rust, investigate crash reports, and adjust settings for fuzzing, or testing with generated inputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Detect memory errors while fuzzing C/C++
  • Test unsafe Rust and calls to external libraries
  • Interpret an ASan crash report
trailofbits/skills76402026年10月16日 更新

aflpp

免费

Sets up AFL++ to test C/C++ programs with varied generated inputs, a technique called fuzzing. Covers running tests across CPU cores, monitoring progress, reducing input collections, and reproducing crashes for investigation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Running C/C++ fuzzing across multiple CPU cores
  • Exploring further after libFuzzer progress stalls
  • Monitoring fuzzing progress and stability
trailofbits/skills76402026年10月16日 更新

Audits GitHub Actions workflows that run AI coding agents. Traces how attacker-controlled content reaches prompts, checks permissions and sandbox settings, and reports evidence, severity, and fixes for prompt injection and related configuration risks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing workflows that run AI coding agents
  • Tracing issue and PR content into agent prompts
  • Checking sandbox settings and user allowlists
trailofbits/skills76402026年10月16日 更新

Reviews Algorand smart contracts written in TEAL or PyTeal for 11 vulnerability patterns. Produces a complete coverage table and findings with code references, severity ratings, and suggested fixes, with optional automated checks using Tealer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Security checks before an Algorand contract audit
  • Reviewing TEAL or PyTeal transaction validation
  • Verifying fixes for reported vulnerabilities
trailofbits/skills76402026年10月16日 更新

atheris

免费

Set up Atheris to test Python code and C extensions with automatically varied inputs. It guides test harness creation, coverage tracking to explore more code, and AddressSanitizer setup for finding memory errors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Fuzzing a Python package or parser
  • Investigating memory corruption in Python C extensions
  • Turning raw bytes into typed test arguments
trailofbits/skills76402026年10月16日 更新

Connect static analysis results and human audit notes to a Trailmark code graph. Group findings by severity and compare them with input flow, impact, and privilege boundaries to prioritize investigation and understand findings in their code context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Connecting Semgrep or CodeQL results to code structure
  • Combining human audit notes with automated findings
  • Prioritizing findings using input flow and impact
trailofbits/skills76402026年10月16日 更新

查看 trailofbits 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题