Get independent code reviews of uncommitted changes, branch differences, or individual commits using Codex or Antigravity. Receive findings with severity, locations, impact, and suggested corrections, and compare where the two reviewers agree or differ.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Gets independent code reviews from Codex or Antigravity for uncommitted changes, branch diffs, and commits. Use when the user requests an external review, a second opinion on code, a codex review, a gemini review, an antigravity review, or /second-opinion.
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Run an external CLI review of the user's selected changes. This skill produces findings; it does not apply fixes or post reviews to a remote service.
Use the provider, scope, model, and focus already supplied by the user. Ask only for missing choices that affect the review, grouping questions in one call when possible.
For an unspecified Google CLI, prefer Antigravity (agy). An explicit
Gemini CLI request uses the Gemini reference below. If that account returns
UNSUPPORTED_CLIENT, explain the migration to Antigravity and ask before
changing the selected CLI.
A missing executable or account setup is a failed review attempt. Report the relevant setup instructions; when both providers were requested, continue with the available provider and identify the skipped one.
Read review-input.md for the shared prompt and diff recipes. Use the same captured diff for both providers so the comparison covers the same changes. Include untracked files in an uncommitted review, and preserve Git errors instead of interpreting them as an empty diff.
Show the selected scope and a brief change summary. If there are no changes, stop before calling a provider. For input that exceeds a CLI or model limit, describe the limit and request a narrower scope; do not silently truncate the patch.
Create prompt, output, and diagnostic files with mktemp outside the
checkout. Use separate output and diagnostic files for each provider.
Define shell variables in the same Bash invocation that uses them.
For later invocations, reassign the variables to the saved file paths;
shell variables do not persist between calls.
Write repository content as literal data, without shell expansion.
Read only the reference for each selected provider:
| Provider | Invocation and result |
|---|---|
| Codex | codex-invocation.md: codex exec with the review schema |
| Antigravity | antigravity-invocation.md: agy print mode with prose output |
| Gemini CLI | gemini-invocation.md: headless gemini for accounts that still support it |
The Codex path needs no MCP server. Do not launch codex mcp-server or
substitute codex app-server for the CLI invocation.
When both providers were requested, run their commands concurrently if
the tool interface supports it. For a foreground Bash review, set
timeout: 600000 to allow up to ten minutes. Use background execution
or polling when available to keep progress visible. Do not enable
automatic approval of writes to make a review run.
Present findings with the provider and actual model used, severity, file and line, impact, and suggested correction. Keep low-severity defects visible. For Codex, the existing schema uses 0 for informational, 1 for low, 2 for medium, and 3 for high; sort descending.
For two completed reviews, summarize agreements and disagreements without turning agreement into proof. Distinguish the external findings from any assessment you add.
Read the captured output and diagnostics. A nonzero exit, missing output, invalid JSON, permission denial that prevents inspection, or a request to approve a plan is incomplete work, not a clean review. Report the failure and any partial results. Retry only for a diagnosed, recoverable cause; do not cycle through providers after authentication or quota failures.
/second-opinion:second-opinion use Codex to review my uncommitted changes for bugs
selects Codex and includes staged, unstaged, and untracked changes./second-opinion:second-opinion compare Codex and Antigravity on this branch against origin/main
sends the same branch patch to both and compares their findings./second-opinion:second-opinion use Gemini CLI to review commit abc1234 for security issues
preserves the requested CLI and reviews that commit.还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Build and test code with AddressSanitizer, a tool that detects invalid memory access during execution. Configure checks for C/C++ and unsafe Rust, investigate crash reports, and adjust settings for fuzzing, or testing with generated inputs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Sets up AFL++ to test C/C++ programs with varied generated inputs, a technique called fuzzing. Covers running tests across CPU cores, monitoring progress, reducing input collections, and reproducing crashes for investigation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Audits GitHub Actions workflows that run AI coding agents. Traces how attacker-controlled content reaches prompts, checks permissions and sandbox settings, and reports evidence, severity, and fixes for prompt injection and related configuration risks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Reviews Algorand smart contracts written in TEAL or PyTeal for 11 vulnerability patterns. Produces a complete coverage table and findings with code references, severity ratings, and suggested fixes, with optional automated checks using Tealer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Set up Atheris to test Python code and C extensions with automatically varied inputs. It guides test harness creation, coverage tracking to explore more code, and AddressSanitizer setup for finding memory errors.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Connect static analysis results and human audit notes to a Trailmark code graph. Group findings by severity and compare them with input flow, impact, and privilege boundaries to prioritize investigation and understand findings in their code context.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。