跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

trailmark-structural

Analyze code structure with Trailmark to identify complex functions, trace input flow, assess impact across connected code, and locate privilege boundaries. The resulting JSON provides detailed evidence for deciding where to focus a code audit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Runs full Trailmark structural analysis by building a graph, running `preanalysis()`, and reporting hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries, attack surface, and version-gated Trailmark 0.4+/0.5+ data such as proxy counts, subgraph edges, type/reference summaries, and entrypoint attributes. Use when vivisect needs detailed structural data for a target. Triggers: structural analysis, blast radius, taint analysis, complexity hotspots, proxy nodes, type references.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Prioritizing code audit targets
  • Tracing input flow and assessing impact
  • Inspecting unresolved calls and type references
  • Preparing structural data for Vivisect Phase 1

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml256 B
  • assets/trail-of-bits-mark.svg3.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Trailmark Structural Analysis

Builds a Trailmark graph and runs engine.preanalysis() to compute all four pre-analysis passes. The core workflow is v0.2-safe; v0.4-only details are included only after checking method availability, and newer builds enrich the same output (0.5.0+ adds an attributes key to attack-surface entries and proxy.external:* nodes from .trailmark/links.toml) without any workflow change.

When to Use

  • Vivisect Phase 1 needs full structural data (hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries)
  • Detailed pre-analysis passes for a specific target scope
  • Generating complexity and taint data for audit prioritization
  • Inspecting proxy/unresolved-call counts, subgraph edges, or type-reference summaries when Trailmark 0.4.0+ is installed

When NOT to Use

  • Quick overview only (use trailmark-summary instead)
  • Ad-hoc code graph queries (use the main trailmark skill directly)
  • Target is a single small file where structural analysis adds no value

Rationalizations to Reject

RationalizationWhy It's WrongRequired Action
"Summary analysis is enough"Summary skips taint, blast radius, and privilege boundary dataRun full structural analysis when detailed data is needed
"One pass is sufficient"Passes cross-reference each other — taint without blast radius misses critical nodesRun all four passes
"Tool isn't installed, I'll analyze manually"Manual analysis misses what tooling catchesReport "trailmark is not installed" and return
"Empty pass output means the pass failed"Some passes produce no data for some codebases (e.g., no privilege boundaries)Return full output regardless
"A v0.4 field is always present"Users may still have Trailmark 0.2.x installedProbe with hasattr() before querying v0.4-only methods

Usage

The target directory is passed via the args parameter.

Execution

Step 1: Check that trailmark is available.

trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null || \
  uv run trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null

If neither command works, report "trailmark is not installed" and return. Do NOT run pip install, uv pip install, git clone, or any install command. The user must install trailmark themselves.

Optionally record the version:

trailmark --version 2>/dev/null || uv run trailmark --version 2>/dev/null || true

Do not fail if this command is missing; use API feature probes below.

Step 2: Detect languages with Trailmark's parse API.

python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys

try:
    from trailmark.parse import detect_languages  # canonical location since 0.3.x
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    # v0.2.x predates trailmark.parse; the same function lives in query.api
    from trailmark.query.api import detect_languages

print(json.dumps(detect_languages(sys.argv[1])))
PY

If the import fails, rerun the same snippet with uv run --with trailmark python - "{args}". If the result is [], report "Trailmark found no supported languages under target" and return.

Step 3: Run the full structural analysis via QueryEngine.

Run this snippet with python3. If the import fails, rerun the same snippet under uv run --with trailmark python - "{args}".

python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys

try:
    from trailmark.parse import detect_languages  # canonical location since 0.3.x
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    # v0.2.x predates trailmark.parse; the same function lives in query.api
    from trailmark.query.api import detect_languages

from trailmark.query.api import QueryEngine

target = sys.argv[1]
languages = detect_languages(target)
engine = QueryEngine.from_directory(target, language="auto")
preanalysis = engine.preanalysis()

def summarize_subgraph(name: str, limit: int = 25) -> dict[str, object]:
    nodes = engine.subgraph(name)
    summary = {
        "count": len(nodes),
        "sample_ids": [node["id"] for node in nodes[:limit]],
    }
    if hasattr(engine, "subgraph_edges"):
        summary["edge_count"] = len(engine.subgraph_edges(name))
    return summary

graph = json.loads(engine.to_json())
nodes = graph.get("nodes", {})
proxy_nodes = [
    node_id for node_id, node in nodes.items()
    if node.get("kind") == "proxy" or node.get("origin") == "proxy"
]

payload = {
    "languages": languages,
    "summary": engine.summary(),
    "preanalysis": preanalysis,
    "attack_surface": engine.attack_surface()[:25],
    "hotspots": engine.complexity_hotspots(10)[:25],
    "proxy_nodes": proxy_nodes[:25],
    "subgraphs": {
        name: summarize_subgraph(name)
        for name in engine.subgraph_names()
    },
}

if hasattr(engine, "type_references"):
    payload["type_reference_samples"] = {
        node_id: engine.type_references(node_id)[:10]
        for node_id in list(nodes)[:25]
    }

print(json.dumps(payload, indent=2))
PY

Step 4: Verify the output.

The output should include:

  • languages
  • summary
  • preanalysis
  • hotspots (possibly empty)
  • proxy_nodes (empty on v0.2.x or when there are no unresolved calls; on 0.5.0+ may include proxy.external:* entries declared in .trailmark/links.toml)
  • subgraphs with counts and sample IDs

On Trailmark 0.5.0+, attack_surface entries may carry an attributes object (e.g. solidity_visibility, solidity_overridden_by). Pass it through unchanged — downstream consumers use it to rank entrypoints.

Some subgraphs may have zero nodes for some codebases (this is normal). Return the full JSON payload regardless.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Build and test code with AddressSanitizer, a tool that detects invalid memory access during execution. Configure checks for C/C++ and unsafe Rust, investigate crash reports, and adjust settings for fuzzing, or testing with generated inputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Detect memory errors while fuzzing C/C++
  • Test unsafe Rust and calls to external libraries
  • Interpret an ASan crash report
trailofbits/skills76472026年10月16日 更新

aflpp

免费

Sets up AFL++ to test C/C++ programs with varied generated inputs, a technique called fuzzing. Covers running tests across CPU cores, monitoring progress, reducing input collections, and reproducing crashes for investigation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Running C/C++ fuzzing across multiple CPU cores
  • Exploring further after libFuzzer progress stalls
  • Monitoring fuzzing progress and stability
trailofbits/skills76472026年10月16日 更新

Audits GitHub Actions workflows that run AI coding agents. Traces how attacker-controlled content reaches prompts, checks permissions and sandbox settings, and reports evidence, severity, and fixes for prompt injection and related configuration risks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing workflows that run AI coding agents
  • Tracing issue and PR content into agent prompts
  • Checking sandbox settings and user allowlists
trailofbits/skills76472026年10月16日 更新

Reviews Algorand smart contracts written in TEAL or PyTeal for 11 vulnerability patterns. Produces a complete coverage table and findings with code references, severity ratings, and suggested fixes, with optional automated checks using Tealer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Security checks before an Algorand contract audit
  • Reviewing TEAL or PyTeal transaction validation
  • Verifying fixes for reported vulnerabilities
trailofbits/skills76472026年10月16日 更新

atheris

免费

Set up Atheris to test Python code and C extensions with automatically varied inputs. It guides test harness creation, coverage tracking to explore more code, and AddressSanitizer setup for finding memory errors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Fuzzing a Python package or parser
  • Investigating memory corruption in Python C extensions
  • Turning raw bytes into typed test arguments
trailofbits/skills76472026年10月16日 更新

Connect static analysis results and human audit notes to a Trailmark code graph. Group findings by severity and compare them with input flow, impact, and privilege boundaries to prioritize investigation and understand findings in their code context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Connecting Semgrep or CodeQL results to code structure
  • Combining human audit notes with automated findings
  • Prioritizing findings using input flow and impact
trailofbits/skills76472026年10月16日 更新

查看 trailofbits 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题