跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ai-threat-testing

Offensive AI security testing and exploitation framework. Systematically tests LLM applications for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including prompt injection, model extraction, data poisoning, and supply chain attacks. Integrates with pentest workflows to discover and exploit AI-specific threats.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools星标 595(GitHub 595 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(26)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • reference/adversarial-pixel-attacks.md5.3 KB
  • reference/agentic-tool-hijacking.md7.2 KB
  • reference/catalog/llm-top10-2025.json6.5 KB
  • reference/gradient-leakage-attacks.md5.4 KB
  • reference/hopfield-recovery.md4.6 KB
  • reference/llm01-prompt-injection.md3.4 KB
  • reference/llm02-insecure-output.md2.9 KB
  • reference/llm03-training-poisoning.md3.4 KB
  • reference/llm04-resource-exhaustion.md3.0 KB
  • reference/llm05-supply-chain.md4.0 KB
  • reference/llm06-excessive-agency.md4.0 KB
  • reference/llm07-model-extraction.md4.1 KB
  • reference/llm08-vector-poisoning.md3.9 KB
  • reference/llm09-overreliance.md4.1 KB
  • reference/llm10-logging-bypass.md4.6 KB
  • reference/malicious-keras-model-triage.md5.0 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm01-prompt-injection-direct.md3.6 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm01-prompt-injection-indirect.md3.8 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm02-insecure-output-handling.md3.7 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm03-training-data-poisoning.md3.8 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm04-denial-of-service.md3.9 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm05-supply-chain-vulnerabilities.md5.8 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm06-sensitive-info-disclosure.md3.6 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm07-insecure-plugin-design.md3.8 KB
  • reference/scenarios/llm/llm08-excessive-agency.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

AI Threat Testing

Test LLM applications for OWASP LLM Top 10 vulnerabilities using 10 specialized agents. Use for authorized AI security assessments.

Quick Start

1. Specify target (LLM app URL, API endpoint, or local model)
2. Select scope: Full OWASP Top 10 | Specific vulnerability | Supply chain
3. Agents deploy, test, capture evidence
4. Professional report with PoCs generated

Coverage — OWASP LLM Top 10, 2025 edition

Which file addresses which category is decided by reference/catalog/llm-top10-2025.json, not by the filename. The llmNN- prefixes on disk predate the 2025 renumbering and no longer match; the content is correct, the labels were not. Cite an id only with its edition (LLM06:2025), because a bare LLM06 means two different categories depending on which edition the reader assumes.

CategoryAttack surface
LLM01:2025 Prompt InjectionDirect and indirect injection, instruction override, filter evasion
LLM02:2025 Sensitive Information DisclosureTraining-data and cross-tenant RAG leakage, canary verification
LLM03:2025 Supply ChainDependency CVEs, model provenance, malicious serialized models
LLM04:2025 Data and Model PoisoningBackdoor triggers, membership inference, behavioural anomalies
LLM05:2025 Improper Output HandlingCode/XSS injection downstream, unsafe deserialization
LLM06:2025 Excessive AgencyTool/plugin abuse, privilege escalation, unauthorised actions — the category that matters for agents rather than chatbots
LLM07:2025 System Prompt LeakageGap — no playbook yet. See the catalogue: what the prompt contains is a separate finding from whether it can be extracted
LLM08:2025 Vector and Embedding WeaknessesRAG injection, retrieval manipulation, embedding inversion
LLM09:2025 MisinformationHallucination and confidence manipulation where output is relied upon
LLM10:2025 Unbounded ConsumptionToken flooding, cost impact, and model extraction/theft (2025 treats extraction-by-query as a consumption problem)

Two classes are testable but are not OWASP categories, so they carry local TX- ids rather than an invented LLMnn: monitoring evasion / forensic gaps, and adversarial perturbation of non-text input. tools/test_llm_numbering.py enforces that separation.

Workflows

Full Assessment (4-8 hours):

- [ ] Reconnaissance
- [ ] Deploy all 10 agents
- [ ] Execute exploits
- [ ] Capture evidence
- [ ] Generate report

Focused Testing (1-3 hours):

- [ ] Select a category from the catalogue (LLM01:2025 .. LLM10:2025, or a TX- local class)
- [ ] Deploy agent
- [ ] Execute techniques
- [ ] Document findings

Supply Chain Audit (2-4 hours):

- [ ] Inventory dependencies
- [ ] Scan CVEs
- [ ] Test plugins/APIs
- [ ] Verify model provenance

Integration

Enhances /pentest with AI-specific testing:

  • Traditional pentesting + AI threat testing = complete security assessment
  • Chain vulnerabilities across traditional and AI vectors
  • Unified reporting with CVSS scores

Key Techniques

Prompt Injection: Instruction override, system prompt extraction, filter evasion Model Extraction: Query sampling, token analysis, membership inference Data Poisoning: Behavioral anomalies, backdoor triggers, bias analysis DoS: Token flooding, recursive expansion, context exhaustion Supply Chain: CVE scanning, plugin audit, model verification MCP Tool Abuse: MCP server inspectors/debuggers often expose /api/mcp/connect or similar endpoints that accept serverConfig with arbitrary command parameters — unauthenticated RCE. Check for MCP Inspector, MCP Playground, or any MCP debugging UI on non-standard ports (6274, 3000, etc.).

Evidence Capture

All agents collect: screenshots, network logs, API responses, errors, console output, execution metrics.

Reporting

Automated reports include: executive summary, detailed findings (CVSS scores), PoC scripts, evidence, remediation guidance.

Critical Rules

  • Written authorization REQUIRED before testing
  • Never exceed defined scope
  • Test in isolated environments when possible
  • Document all findings with reproducible PoCs
  • Follow responsible disclosure practices

Integration

  • Integrates with /pentest skill for comprehensive security testing
  • AI-specific vulnerability knowledge in /AGENTS.md
  • Attack playbooks in reference/llm0X-*.md

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

API security testing - GraphQL, REST API, WebSocket, and Web-LLM attack techniques.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Stitches confirmed single-asset findings into multi-hop attack paths across the organization. Builds a graph where nodes are assets and edges are confirmed exploit hops citing the findings that enable them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Acquire an authenticated session THROUGH MFA/OTP on an in-scope target and emit a reusable session artifact (Playwright storageState + Bearer) so executors can test the post-auth attack surface. Use when the highest-value authenticated classes (BOLA/IDOR/mass-assignment/injection on the real data APIs) are blocked because login is gated by SMS-OTP or TOTP MFA. Distinct from the authentication skill (which ATTACKS auth); this one legitimately authenticates and hands the session to the rest of the engagement.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Authentication security testing - auth bypass, JWT attacks, OAuth flaws, password attacks, 2FA bypass, CAPTCHA bypass, and bot detection evasion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Smart contract security testing and blockchain CTF exploitation. Covers Solidity vulnerability analysis, EVM storage manipulation, delegatecall attacks, CREATE/CREATE2 address prediction, and common DeFi exploit patterns. Use when analyzing Solidity contracts, solving blockchain challenges, or testing smart contract security.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Client-side vulnerability testing - XSS (reflected/stored/DOM), CSRF, CORS misconfiguration, Clickjacking, DOM-based attacks, and Prototype Pollution.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

查看 transilienceai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题