Review Archify issues, pull requests, and code by weighing user value, implementation and maintenance costs, and wider impact. Use evidence to decide whether work is worthwhile, compare alternatives, and identify questions that still affect the decision.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review Archify issues, PRs, or code through value, cost, and impact to support evidence-based maintenance decisions. Use for issue triage, change reviews, and code quality assessments.
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Judge whether a problem is worth addressing and an approach is worth maintaining over time.
Consider maintainability, complexity, compatibility, performance, and other relevant concerns within these three dimensions, according to the specific problem.
Ground judgments in evidence: verify the target revision and relevant facts, distinguish direct verification from existing evidence and assumptions, and choose checks that resolve the key uncertainties.
Explain whether the work is worthwhile, the approach's cost and impact, any better alternatives, and unresolved questions that matter to the decision. Give reasons and scale the detail to the importance of each concern.
For repository-specific review and contribution requirements, consult REVIEWING.md and CONTRIBUTING.md as needed.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Turn plain-language descriptions, Mermaid diagrams, or repository evidence into interactive standalone HTML diagrams. Create system maps, workflows, timelines, database relationships, and everyday process diagrams, with automated validation, light and dark themes, and image, SVG, or WebM export.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Evaluate improvements to Archify diagrams using actual outputs and agent work records. Compare accuracy, readability, and total delivery time to investigate layout, connection routing, diagnostics, and authoring guidance, then document what the evidence supports.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Audit a codebase for unnecessary complexity, including dead code, duplicated state, redundant interfaces, and obsolete compatibility paths. Receive evidence-backed simplification candidates, or authorize changes that remove justified targets and validate the behavior that must remain.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Evaluate slow, unreliable, duplicated, or brittle tests by the behavior they protect and their maintenance cost. Use it to choose focused checks, justify additions or removals, and distinguish product bugs from outdated expectations or environment failures.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。