跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

refactor

Code refactoring workflow - analyze → plan → implement → review → validate

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

/refactor - Refactoring Workflow

Safe refactoring with review gates.

When to Use

  • "Refactor X"
  • "Clean up this code"
  • "Extract this into a module"
  • "Improve the architecture of Y"
  • Large-scale code restructuring
  • Technical debt reduction

Workflow Overview

┌──────────┐    ┌────────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌──────────┐    ┌───────────┐
│ phoenix  │───▶│   plan-    │───▶│  kraken  │───▶│plan-reviewer│───▶│ arbiter  │
│          │    │   agent    │    │          │    │          │    │           │
└──────────┘    └────────────┘    └──────────┘    └──────────┘    └───────────┘
  Analyze         Plan             Implement       Review          Verify
  current         changes          refactor        changes         tests pass

Agent Sequence

#AgentRoleOutput
1phoenixAnalyze current code, identify improvement areasAnalysis report
2plan-agentCreate safe refactoring planStep-by-step plan
3krakenImplement the refactoringCode changes
4plan-reviewerReview changes for correctnessReview report
5arbiterVerify all tests still passTest report

Refactoring Principles

  1. Tests first: Ensure adequate test coverage before refactoring
  2. Small steps: Each change should be independently verifiable
  3. Behavior preserved: No functional changes during refactor
  4. Reviewable: Changes should be easy to review

Execution

Phase 1: Analyze

Task(
  subagent_type="phoenix",
  prompt="""
  Analyze for refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Identify:
  - Current pain points
  - Code smells
  - Improvement opportunities
  - Risk areas
  - Test coverage gaps
  """
)

Phase 2: Plan

Task(
  subagent_type="plan-agent",
  prompt="""
  Plan refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Analysis: [from phoenix]

  Create:
  - Step-by-step refactoring plan
  - Each step should be:
    - Small and focused
    - Independently testable
    - Reversible
  - Identify files affected
  - Risk mitigation strategy
  """
)

Phase 3: Implement

Task(
  subagent_type="kraken",
  prompt="""
  Implement refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Plan: [from plan-agent]

  Requirements:
  - Follow plan exactly
  - Run tests after each step
  - Stop if tests fail
  - NO behavior changes
  """
)

Phase 4: Review

Task(
  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",
  prompt="""
  Review refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  Changes: [git diff from kraken]

  Check:
  - Behavior preserved
  - No unintended changes
  - Code quality improved
  - Patterns consistent
  """
)

Phase 5: Validate

Task(
  subagent_type="arbiter",
  prompt="""
  Validate refactoring: [TARGET_CODE]

  - Run full test suite
  - Verify no regressions
  - Check type errors
  - Run linting
  """
)

Refactoring Types

Extract Module

phoenix → plan-agent → kraken → plan-reviewer → arbiter

Rename/Restructure

phoenix → kraken → arbiter  (simpler, skip detailed planning)

Architecture Change

phoenix → plan-agent → [kraken → plan-reviewer] × N phases → arbiter

Example

User: /refactor Extract the validation logic into a separate module

Claude: Starting /refactor workflow...

Phase 1: Analyzing current structure...
[Spawns phoenix]
Found: Validation logic spread across 4 files
- form.ts (lines 45-120)
- api.ts (lines 200-280)
- user.ts (lines 15-45)
- order.ts (lines 88-130)

Phase 2: Planning extraction...
[Spawns plan-agent]
Plan:
1. Create src/validation/index.ts
2. Extract common validators
3. Update imports one file at a time
4. Run tests after each change

Phase 3: Implementing...
[Spawns kraken]
Completed all 4 steps, tests green after each

Phase 4: Reviewing changes...
[Spawns plan-reviewer]
✅ All behavior preserved
✅ DRY improved (removed 45 duplicate lines)
✅ New structure consistent

Phase 5: Final validation...
[Spawns arbiter]
✅ 312 tests passing, 0 regressions

Refactoring complete!

Safety Flags

  • --dry-run: Plan but don't implement
  • --step-by-step: Pause after each change for approval
  • --coverage-check: Require >80% coverage before proceeding

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader optimization

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

axe-core integration, WCAG 2.2 AA checklist, keyboard navigation testing, screen reader testing, and ARIA pattern validation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Steam-style achievement system with XP, levels, streaks, and skill trees. Gamifies the development workflow. 25 achievements across 5 categories.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Framework for measuring and tracking agent response quality over time. Detects regressions before they reach production. Use when evaluating agent changes, auditing quality, or establishing performance baselines.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Agent Context Isolation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Agent ve skill dosyalarinin yapisal dogrulamasi. Frontmatter kontrol, naming convention, zorunlu bolum kontrolu, tutarlilik denetimi. Yeni agent/skill eklendiginde veya mevcut dosyalar duzenlediginde otomatik calistirilir.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

查看 vibeeval 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题