跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

sharp-edges

Identify dangerous API footguns, surprising default behaviors, and sharp edges in codebases and dependencies. Adapted from Trail of Bits. Use during code review to catch APIs that are easy to misuse, configurations that surprise, and abstractions that leak.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Sharp Edges Detection

Sharp edges are APIs, configurations, and patterns that are easy to use incorrectly. They work in the happy path but break in subtle, dangerous ways.

Three Adversary Types

When evaluating sharp edges, consider three types of users:

1. The Naive Developer

  • Uses the API without reading docs carefully
  • Copies examples from Stack Overflow
  • Assumes defaults are safe
  • Question: "Will this API hurt someone who doesn't know its quirks?"

2. The Malicious User

  • Intentionally sends unexpected input
  • Exploits race conditions and edge cases
  • Chains small issues into big exploits
  • Question: "Can someone deliberately trigger the bad behavior?"

3. The Future Maintainer

  • Modifies code without full context
  • Refactors without understanding invariants
  • Doesn't know why something was done a certain way
  • Question: "Will a reasonable change to this code introduce a bug?"

Sharp Edge Categories

1. Surprising Default Behavior

APIs whose defaults do something unexpected:

// SHARP: parseInt without radix
parseInt("08")    // 0 in old engines (octal), 8 in modern
parseInt("08", 10)  // Always 8

// SHARP: Array.sort() without comparator
[10, 2, 1].sort()  // [1, 10, 2] -- sorts as strings!
[10, 2, 1].sort((a, b) => a - b)  // [1, 2, 10]

// SHARP: JSON.parse reviver runs bottom-up
JSON.parse('{"a": {"b": 1}}', (key, val) => {
  // 'b' fires before 'a' -- counterintuitive
})

// SHARP: fetch() doesn't reject on HTTP errors
const res = await fetch('/api')  // 404 doesn't throw!
if (!res.ok) throw new Error(`HTTP ${res.status}`)

2. Silent Failures

Operations that fail without telling you:

// SHARP: Object.freeze is shallow
const obj = Object.freeze({ nested: { value: 1 } })
obj.nested.value = 2  // Succeeds! Only top level is frozen

// SHARP: Map vs Object key coercion
const map = new Map()
map.set(1, 'number')
map.set('1', 'string')
map.get(1)   // 'number' -- Map preserves key types
// But:
const obj = {}
obj[1] = 'number'
obj['1'] = 'string'
obj[1]  // 'string' -- Object coerces keys to strings

// SHARP: Promise.all fails fast
Promise.all([p1, p2, p3])  // If p1 fails, p2/p3 results are lost
Promise.allSettled([p1, p2, p3])  // Always returns all results

3. Type Coercion Traps

// SHARP: == vs ===
null == undefined   // true
0 == ''            // true
false == '0'       // true
// Always use ===

// SHARP: typeof null
typeof null  // 'object' -- historical bug, never fixed

// SHARP: NaN
NaN === NaN  // false
Number.isNaN(x)  // Use this instead of x === NaN

4. Concurrency Sharp Edges

// SHARP: async forEach doesn't await
[1, 2, 3].forEach(async (item) => {
  await processItem(item)  // Fires all at once, doesn't wait
})
// Use for...of instead
for (const item of [1, 2, 3]) {
  await processItem(item)
}

// SHARP: Race condition in check-then-act
const exists = await db.findOne({ email })
if (!exists) {
  await db.create({ email })  // Another request might create it between check and act
}
// Use upsert or unique constraint instead

5. Security Sharp Edges

// SHARP: URL parsing inconsistencies
new URL('http://evil.com\\@good.com')  // Different browsers parse differently

// SHARP: RegExp without anchors
/admin/.test('not-admin-page')  // true! No ^ or $

// SHARP: Timing attacks on string comparison
if (userToken === storedToken) { }  // Vulnerable to timing attack
// Use crypto.timingSafeEqual instead

// SHARP: Path traversal via join
path.join('/uploads', userInput)  // '../../../etc/passwd' works!
path.resolve('/uploads', userInput)  // Still dangerous
// Validate that result starts with base directory

6. Database Sharp Edges

// SHARP: MongoDB operator injection
db.users.find({ username: req.body.username })
// If req.body.username = { "$ne": "" }, returns all users!
// Sanitize: validate input is a string

// SHARP: SQL LIKE injection
db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE name LIKE '%${input}%'`)
// Input: "%" returns all, "_" matches any char
// Use parameterized queries with ESCAPE clause

// SHARP: ORM lazy loading in loops (N+1)
const users = await User.findAll()
for (const user of users) {
  const posts = await user.getPosts()  // N+1 queries!
}
// Use eager loading: User.findAll({ include: Post })

7. Framework Sharp Edges

// SHARP: React useEffect cleanup race
useEffect(() => {
  let cancelled = false
  fetchData().then(data => {
    if (!cancelled) setState(data)  // Without this, stale updates
  })
  return () => { cancelled = true }
}, [])

// SHARP: Express middleware order matters
app.use(cors())
app.use(helmet())
app.use(authMiddleware)
app.use(rateLimiter)
// If rateLimiter is AFTER auth, unauthenticated requests aren't limited

// SHARP: Next.js revalidate: 0 is NOT "no cache"
// revalidate: 0 means "revalidate on every request" (still caches)
// Use { cache: 'no-store' } for truly no cache

Detection Checklist

For each API/function/config in review:
[ ] What happens with empty/null/undefined input?
[ ] What happens with extremely large input?
[ ] What happens with concurrent access?
[ ] What happens when the network is slow/down?
[ ] What are the default values? Are they safe?
[ ] Does it fail silently or loudly?
[ ] Is the error message helpful or misleading?
[ ] Will a future developer understand the constraints?
[ ] Is there a safer alternative API?

Documentation Pattern

When you find a sharp edge, document it:

SHARP EDGE: [API/pattern name]
SURPRISE: [What happens that developers don't expect]
DANGER: [What can go wrong -- security, data loss, correctness]
FIX: [The safe alternative]
AFFECTED: [Which files/modules in this codebase use it]

Integration with vibecosystem

  • code-reviewer agent: Check for known sharp edges during review
  • security-reviewer agent: Focus on security sharp edges
  • self-learner agent: When a sharp edge causes a bug, learn and add to detection
  • tdd-guide agent: Write tests that exercise sharp edge behavior

Inspired by Trail of Bits sharp-edges plugin.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader optimization

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

axe-core integration, WCAG 2.2 AA checklist, keyboard navigation testing, screen reader testing, and ARIA pattern validation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Steam-style achievement system with XP, levels, streaks, and skill trees. Gamifies the development workflow. 25 achievements across 5 categories.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Framework for measuring and tracking agent response quality over time. Detects regressions before they reach production. Use when evaluating agent changes, auditing quality, or establishing performance baselines.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Agent Context Isolation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

Agent ve skill dosyalarinin yapisal dogrulamasi. Frontmatter kontrol, naming convention, zorunlu bolum kontrolu, tutarlilik denetimi. Yeni agent/skill eklendiginde veya mevcut dosyalar duzenlediginde otomatik calistirilir.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5382026年8月9日 更新

查看 vibeeval 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题