跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

comm-lit-review

Review communications research by searching existing libraries and notes before academic databases. Produce a paper comparison table covering methods, results, and limitations, then summarize major approaches, evidence strength, and remaining research gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary.

集成工具Obsidian

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Surveying research on wireless and satellite communications
  • Finding related work from saved papers and notes
  • Comparing assumptions, methods, and limitations across papers
  • Identifying established approaches and open research questions

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Comm Lit Review Claude Single

Research topic: $ARGUMENTS

Purpose

Use this skill for communications-domain literature review when the topic is about:

  • wireless communications
  • cellular systems, 4G/5G/6G, NR, NTN
  • satellite, LEO, GEO, integrated space-air-ground systems
  • Wi-Fi, WLAN, mesh, ad hoc, sidelink, V2X
  • routing, scheduling, resource allocation, beamforming
  • rate adaptation, link adaptation, ACM, HARQ, CSI feedback
  • transport protocols and congestion control in communication networks
  • cross-layer optimization for communication systems

If the center of gravity is generic ML architecture research, pure control theory without communications literature, or software/API documentation rather than papers, fall back to a general literature skill.

Constants

  • PAPER_LIBRARY: Check local PDFs in this order:
    1. papers/ in the current project
    2. literature/ in the current project
    3. Custom path specified by the user in CLAUDE.md under ## Paper Library
  • MAX_LOCAL_PAPERS = 20: Maximum number of local PDFs to scan. If there are more, prioritize by filename and first-page relevance.

Source Selection

Parse $ARGUMENTS for a — sources: directive.

  • If — sources: is specified, only search the listed sources.
  • If not specified, default to:
    • zotero
    • obsidian
    • local
    • ieee
    • sciencedirect
    • acm
    • web

Valid source values:

  • zotero
  • obsidian
  • local
  • ieee
  • sciencedirect
  • acm
  • web
  • all

If all is specified, interpret it as the full default source set.

Retrieval Order

This is a knowledge-base-first skill. Search in this order unless the user overrides it:

  1. Zotero
  2. Obsidian
  3. local papers/ and literature/
  4. IEEE Xplore
  5. ScienceDirect
  6. ACM Digital Library
  7. broader web

Graceful degradation rules:

  • If a source is unavailable, do not fail.
  • Skip it silently.
  • Continue to the next source.

External Search Policy

For external search:

  • prefer IEEE Xplore first
  • then ScienceDirect
  • then ACM
  • then broader web only when needed

Publication policy:

  • prefer peer-reviewed journals and major conferences
  • label workshop papers as workshop
  • label arXiv-only or author-hosted versions as preprint
  • if both preprint and formal version exist, cite the formal version first

Time-window policy:

  • if the user does not specify a year range, include both a short foundational set and a recent set
  • recommended split:
    • foundational: before 2022
    • recent: 2022 to present

Venue Priority

Within each database tier, search venue tiers in this order.

Tier A

Journals:

  • IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC)
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN)
  • IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (TWC)
  • IEEE Transactions on Communications (TCOM)

Conferences:

  • ACM SIGCOMM
  • USENIX NSDI
  • ACM MobiCom
  • ACM CoNEXT
  • IEEE INFOCOM

Tier B

Journals:

  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (TVT)
  • IEEE Wireless Communications Letters (WCL)
  • IEEE Communications Letters
  • Computer Networks
  • Computer Communications
  • Ad Hoc Networks
  • Physical Communication

Conferences:

  • IEEE ICC
  • IEEE GLOBECOM
  • IEEE WCNC
  • IEEE PIMRC
  • ACM MobiHoc

Tier C

  • other relevant IEEE journals and transactions
  • other relevant Elsevier journals
  • other clearly relevant ACM conferences and workshops
  • topic-specific satellite, optical, vehicular, IoT, aerial, or edge communications venues

Usage rules:

  • start from Tier A
  • widen to Tier B if needed
  • widen to Tier C if still sparse
  • only then broaden to full web search
  • by default this is a soft priority, not a hard whitelist
  • if the user says only top venues, top journals only, or top conferences only, treat Tier A as a hard filter

Workflow

Step 0a: Search Zotero Library

Skip this step if Zotero MCP is not configured or zotero is not enabled.

If available:

  1. search by topic
  2. capture title, authors, year, venue
  3. pull user annotations, tags, or collections when present
  4. treat these as high-priority evidence because they reflect the user's existing library

Step 0b: Search Obsidian Vault

Skip this step if Obsidian MCP is not configured or obsidian is not enabled.

If available:

  1. search topic-related notes
  2. collect summaries, wikilinks, tags, and paper references
  3. treat these notes as the user's processed understanding of the topic

Step 0c: Scan Local Paper Library

Run this step if local is enabled.

  1. locate PDFs from papers/**/*.pdf and literature/**/*.pdf
  2. de-duplicate against Zotero hits when possible
  3. read the first pages of relevant PDFs
  4. extract title, authors, year, problem, method, and relevance
  5. use local hits to guide and de-duplicate later external search

Step 1: Search External Primary Sources

Use a layered search strategy. For communications topics, avoid random blog posts or tertiary summaries.

Database ladder:

  1. ieeexplore.ieee.org
  2. sciencedirect.com
  3. dl.acm.org
  4. broader web using primary publisher pages, official conference sites, DOI pages, and author-hosted copies of already-identified formal papers

Move to the next database tier only when:

  • the higher-priority tier is too sparse
  • the topic clearly publishes elsewhere
  • the user explicitly asks for broader coverage

Within each database tier:

  1. start from Tier A venues
  2. widen to Tier B if needed
  3. widen to Tier C if still sparse

Step 2: Extract Paper-Level Facts

For each relevant paper, capture:

  • Title
  • Authors
  • Year
  • Venue
  • Layer or system scope
  • Scenario and assumptions
  • Core method
  • Main result or claim
  • Limitation
  • Relevance to the user's topic
  • Source URL
  • Source origin: zotero, obsidian, local, ieee, sciencedirect, acm, or web

Favor concrete numbers, assumptions, and problem definitions over generic paraphrases.

Do not collapse transport-layer rate control and PHY/MAC rate adaptation into one bucket without saying so explicitly.

Synthesis Rules

Group papers by technical axis rather than by search order. Common groupings:

  • PHY/MAC adaptation
  • transport and congestion control
  • NTN and satellite resource management
  • cross-layer or learning-based control
  • measurement and empirical studies

When useful, explicitly separate:

  • foundational vs recent work
  • formal publications vs preprints
  • top-tier vs lower-tier venues
  • single-link vs multi-user formulations
  • simulation-only vs deployment-backed work
  • user-owned sources vs newly surfaced external papers

If evidence is weak, say so instead of smoothing it over.

Output

Use a literature table with these columns:

PaperVenueYearLayerScenarioMethodKey ResultLimitationRelevanceSource

Source should indicate where the paper came from first:

  • zotero
  • obsidian
  • local
  • ieee
  • sciencedirect
  • acm
  • web

After the table, summarize in this order:

  1. what the field is mostly trying to solve
  2. how papers cluster into 2-4 approaches
  3. what the user already had vs what was newly surfaced
  4. where the evidence is strong vs weak
  5. what research gap remains

End with Practical Takeaway:

  • dominant current approach
  • likely saturated direction
  • promising open direction

Key Rules

  • Never fail because Zotero or Obsidian MCP is missing.
  • Prefer user-owned sources first when available, but do not let them replace external validation.
  • Prefer primary formal sources over summaries or tertiary commentary.
  • Prefer IEEE and ScienceDirect first, ACM second, and only then broader web search unless the user asks otherwise.
  • Search venue tiers from top to broad within each database tier.
  • Treat venue tiers as soft ranking by default and hard constraint only when the user explicitly asks for top-only search.
  • Do not pretend a preprint is peer reviewed.
  • If the topic spans multiple layers, say that the literature itself is split across layers.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Plan ablation studies, experiments that remove or replace parts of a machine learning method to test their contribution. Define reviewer questions, expected outcomes, priorities, execution order, and compute estimates, then implement experiments and record findings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Testing the contribution of individual method components
  • Planning additional experiments before paper submission
  • Prioritizing experiments within a GPU budget
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep1.8万2026年10月22日 更新

Plan and run ablation studies, experiments that remove or replace parts of a method to test their contribution. Organize reviewer questions, priorities, expected outcomes, and compute costs, then record results and findings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Test how much each component contributes
  • Plan experiments that address reviewer questions
  • Prioritize comparisons within a compute budget
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep1.8万2026年10月22日 更新

alphaxiv

免费

Understand a single arXiv paper through an AlphaXiv summary, with full text and LaTeX source available when needed. Use it to identify key findings or ask specific questions about methods, experiments, and equations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get a quick overview of a paper from its URL
  • Check a paper's methods and experimental results
  • Ask about equations, proofs, or appendix details
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep1.8万2026年10月22日 更新

Compare machine learning experiment results from JSON or CSV files. Calculate improvements over a baseline, summarize variation across repeated runs, identify trends and unusual results, and suggest experiments to test possible explanations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Compare model performance across experimental conditions
  • Check variation across runs with different random seeds
  • Identify trends as a parameter changes
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep1.8万2026年10月22日 更新

arxiv

免费

Search arXiv papers by topic or paper ID, review authors and abstracts, and summarize contributions stated in the abstracts. Download selected papers or all search results as PDFs to build a local paper library.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Find arXiv papers on a research topic
  • Retrieve details for a known arXiv paper ID
  • Download all PDFs from a set of search results
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep1.8万2026年10月22日 更新

Improve an existing LaTeX paper through two rounds of Gemini review, targeted edits, and PDF rebuilding. Check whether claims match the evidence, resolve notation and presentation issues, and retain review logs and PDF versions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Review and revise a completed paper draft
  • Align claims with supporting evidence
  • Resolve notation and explanation inconsistencies
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep1.8万2026年10月22日 更新

查看 wanshuiyin 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题