跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

linkedin-comment-strategy

This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a comment for this LinkedIn post", "help me respond to this post", "what should I comment on this", "craft a LinkedIn comment", or when Genesis identifies high-value posts in the user's network worth engaging with. Also triggered by "how should I engage on LinkedIn" or "help me be more visible on LinkedIn".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具LinkedIn
查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

LinkedIn Comment Strategy

Purpose

Write LinkedIn comments that build genuine professional visibility — not generic "Great post!" noise. Every comment should demonstrate expertise, add value to the conversation, or make the author want to respond. Comments are the highest-ROI LinkedIn activity for building network presence.

Voice Loading

Before writing comments, load the user's voice via voice-master's overlay resolution:

  1. Read ../voice-master/SKILL.md and follow its User Calibration Overlay section to load exemplars and voice-dimensions from the out-of-repo overlay (or template fallback with warning if no overlay).
  2. This skill's medium is social. Select social-medium exemplars from whatever voice-master loads.
  3. Read ../voice-master/references/anti-slop.md — apply the Universal and Professional / LinkedIn sections.

If no overlay is present, voice-master falls back to generic voice guidance and warns — note this in your output.

Comments follow the same voice rules as posts but in compressed form.

Comment Types

1. Add-Value Comment

Extend the post's point with additional insight, a related experience, or a nuance the author didn't cover.

When to use: The post makes a good point that you can genuinely build on. Length: 2-4 sentences. Example pattern: "[Specific agreement with a detail]. In my experience with [specific context], [additional insight]. [Optional: question or implication]."

2. Respectful Challenge

Disagree with or complicate the post's thesis — with reasoning, not contrarianism.

When to use: The post oversimplifies something or misses a key angle. Length: 3-5 sentences. Example pattern: "[Acknowledge the valid part]. Where I'd push back is [specific point] because [evidence/experience]. [What this changes about the conclusion]."

3. Experience Share

Contribute a relevant personal experience that illustrates or complicates the post's point.

When to use: The post resonates with something you've lived through. Length: 3-6 sentences. Example pattern: "[Brief connection to the post]. When I was [specific situation], [what happened]. [What you learned or how it relates]."

4. Question Comment

Ask a genuine question that advances the discussion. Not a rhetorical question for engagement — a question you'd actually want answered.

When to use: The post raises something you're genuinely curious about. Length: 1-3 sentences. Example pattern: "[What specifically triggered the question]. How do you think about [specific aspect]?"

Anti-Slop Rules for Comments

  • NEVER: "Great post, [Name]!" / "Love this!" / "So true!" / "Couldn't agree more!"
  • NEVER: "Thanks for sharing this, [Name]!" without adding substance
  • NEVER: Tag people who aren't part of the conversation
  • NEVER: Use the comment to pivot to self-promotion
  • NEVER: Write a comment longer than the original post
  • NEVER: Start with an emoji
  • Always reference something SPECIFIC from the post (proves you read it)
  • Always add something the author or readers didn't have before

Comment Workflow

  1. Read the post — The user pastes or describes the post content.

  2. Identify the angle — What's the most natural type of comment given the user's expertise and relationship to the topic?

  3. Check relevance — Is this a post worth commenting on? Criteria:

    • Author is someone the user wants to build a relationship with
    • Topic intersects with the user's expertise
    • Post has meaningful engagement potential (not dead)
    • Comment would be genuine, not forced
  4. Draft — Write the comment in voice. Short, specific, adds value.

  5. Anti-slop check — Verify no banned patterns. Verify it references something specific from the post.

Strategic Commenting Guidance

When the user asks for a general commenting strategy (not a specific comment):

  • Target authors: People in the user's target audience or industry who post regularly and engage with comments. Commenting consistently on 5-10 key authors builds more visibility than scattered commenting.

  • Timing: Comment within the first hour of a post going live. Early comments get more visibility as engagement grows.

  • Frequency: 3-5 meaningful comments per day is more effective than 15 generic ones. Quality signals expertise; quantity signals desperation.

  • Reciprocity: When someone comments on the user's posts, prioritize engaging with their content. Builds genuine relationships.

Output Format

post_summary: <brief summary of the post being commented on>
comment_type: <add-value | challenge | experience | question>
comment: |
  <the comment text>
rationale: |
  <why this type and angle were chosen>

References

  • ../voice-master/SKILL.md — Voice authority; follow its User Calibration Overlay section to load social exemplars from the user overlay
  • ../voice-master/references/anti-slop.md — Universal + Professional/LinkedIn anti-slop rules

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Forward Deployed Engineer delivery contract for AWS engagements, build-first artifacts, grounded cost estimates, Well-Architected review, evolution roadmap

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI992026年10月22日 更新

Canonical guide to Genesis browser automation - layers (Camoufox, Chromium, the user's Chrome over CDP, TinyFish, desktop), per-tool timeouts, safety gates, verify-after-act, what a click checks (scroll, hit test, covered targets), overlays, iframes, tabs, and failure diagnosis

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI992026年10月22日 更新

This skill should be used when a session BUILDS one Genesis item: implementing a change in a worktree through to opening its PR, including rework from a send-back spec. Load `genesis-development` (the shared core) first. Do NOT load it for driving open PRs to merge (`closing-session`), post-merge verification (`validating-merges`), or specifying a change before it is planned (`spec-session`).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI992026年10月22日 更新

cc-update

免费

Update Claude Code (the CC CLI / "clog code") to a new version, or bump the pinned CC version. Use when the user asks to update Claude Code, bump the CC pin, evaluate a new CC release, or says "clog code update". Routes to the canonical, standardized process in docs/reference/cc-compatibility.md — do NOT re-derive the update mechanism by grepping every time. Do NOT use for general "what changed in CC" trivia with no intent to update.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI992026年10月22日 更新

This skill should be used when a session's job is to DRIVE OPEN PRs TO MERGE rather than to write new code — "close out the open PRs", "review and fix the open PRs", "what's blocking our PRs", "which PRs are mergeable". It owns the In Review column: it reads each PR's gate status, verifies and fixes review findings on PRs OTHER sessions built, replies in-thread, and merges a PR only under the owner's authorization: a per-PR yes, or the owner's request for closing work covering a PR whose every gate passes. Do NOT load it for building a feature and opening its PR — that is a build session (`build-session`).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI992026年10月22日 更新

Code understanding tool selection. Use when exploring architecture, finding definitions, tracing call chains, assessing blast radius of changes, or debugging code paths in the Genesis codebase.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI992026年10月22日 更新

查看 WingedGuardian 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题