跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

humanize-docs

Transform AI-generated documentation into human-readable prose with personality. USE WHEN: Converting rigid AI docs (checklist spam, CAPS LOCK emphasis, perfect symmetric structures, template dumps) into flowing, conversational writing that feels colleague-authored. Different from /humanizer — that skill detects AI writing patterns (Wikipedia taxonomy). This skill does aggressive deformalization of document structure and flow. PRIMARY TRIGGERS: "humanize this doc", "make this readable", "remove AI patterns from doc", "add human touch to this" See also: humanizer skill for text-level AI pattern removal.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os星标 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Humanize Docs

Transforms robotic AI-generated documentation into prose that sounds like an actual human wrote it. The approach is aggressive deformalization — not just tweaking tone, but restructuring how information flows to break AI's predictable patterns.

This is a different tool than the humanizer skill. Humanizer removes AI writing tells at the sentence/phrase level (em-dashes, rule-of-three, vague attributions, sycophantic openers). Humanize-docs attacks structural AI-ness: checkbox spam, template overload, perfect symmetry, emotional flatness across an entire document.

When to use this

Clear signals you're dealing with AI-generated docs:

  • Checkbox overload: - [x] Task 1: Do the thing (AC: #1)
  • CAPS LOCK for CRITICAL IMPORTANT NOTES
  • 8+ code templates embedded in one document
  • Every section has exactly 3 perfectly balanced paragraphs
  • Headers like "LLM Developer Guardrails"
  • Phrases: "Certainly, here is...", "It's important to note that...", "Furthermore..."

Transformation workflow

Step 1: Detect

Quick test — does the doc have 5+ of these?

  • Perfect structural symmetry (every section same length)
  • Zero sentence length variation (all 15-20 words)
  • Checkbox addiction
  • Template embedding mania
  • Emotional flatness (no "wait, why?" or "honestly...")

If yes, proceed. If no, it might already be human-written — don't over-transform.

Step 2: Apply the five core transformations

Execute in order. Don't apply all of them everywhere — humans are inconsistent. Some sections stay formal, others get playful. That asymmetry is the point.

1. Burstiness injection Mix 5-word punches with 30-word reflections. AI writes at one rhythm. Humans don't.

Before:

The system processes requests through a standardized pipeline that validates inputs and returns structured responses to the calling service.

After:

It's a pipeline. Request comes in, gets validated, structured response goes back out. Nothing exotic — but the validation step is where things quietly break.

2. Structure dismantling Break perfect 3-paragraph blocks. Add digressions. Not every section needs the same shape.

3. Checkbox annihilation Convert checklists to flowing prose with "anyway, you'll need..." or "first thing is..."

Before:

  • Install package A (required for Task 3)
  • Verify installation with command X
  • Proceed to next task only after confirmation

After:

Install package A first — Task 3 depends on it. Run command X to verify it worked. Once you get confirmation, move on. If it errors out, the next step breaks, so don't skip this.

4. Template contextualization Replace code dumps with "here's what worked for me..." framing. Give the template a reason to exist before showing it.

5. Vocabulary swap Kill: utilize, leverage, facilitate, ensure, enable, enhance, robust, seamless Use: use, use, help, make sure, let, improve, solid, smooth

Step 3: Quality check

Read the output aloud. Does it sound like you'd actually say this to someone?

Red flags the transformation failed:

  • Still too even (every paragraph same vibe)
  • No variation in sentence rhythm
  • Feels like a "professional robot" instead of a person
  • You removed personality instead of adding it

Good signals:

  • Some sentences feel almost too casual (then you toned it back)
  • It reads faster than before
  • You can hear a specific person's voice

Step 4: Domain calibration

Intensity varies by doc type:

Doc typeIntensity
READMEs, internal team docs, onboarding guides, tutorialsHigh
API docs, help docs, technical specsModerate
Legal, compliance, medical, financialGentle only

Quick mode (30 seconds)

Just need to make something readable without full transformation:

  1. Kill the checkboxes — flowing list with "you'll need: X, Y, and Z"
  2. Replace one CAPS LOCK section with italics + context
  3. Add one burstiness break — a 5-word sentence after a long paragraph
  4. Swap 3-5 AI vocabulary words (utilize→use, leverage→use, facilitate→help)

Not perfect, but 70% better readability.

Common mistakes

Don't:

  • Remove ALL structure (humans still use headers)
  • Make everything casual (inconsistency is human)
  • Add emojis
  • Force humor
  • Ignore domain context

Do:

  • Vary transformation intensity across sections
  • Keep some sections more formal for contrast
  • Read aloud to check naturalness
  • Preserve technical accuracy above all

Philosophy

AI writes like it's afraid to break rules. Humans write like they're explaining something to a friend while occasionally remembering they should sound professional. Capture that tension.

Related skills

  • humanizer — sentence/phrase level AI pattern removal (Wikipedia taxonomy, 29 rules)

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Track and surface sub-agent dispatch calibration ratios. Extract from JSONL transcript or read existing ledger. Per-agent clean/blocked/errored/partial trends.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

Compose the AIgent's body state by reading existing signals. Lazy compute. Never polled. Reports the five pressures + recommended reflex.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

brief

免费

Generate a structured delegation brief for any task

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

Quarterly skill that walks the skill-index against the actual SKILL.md files on disk, reports drift (skills indexed that no longer exist, skills on disk that aren't enrolled, skills whose descriptions have changed since enrollment). Hardens the auto-enrollment pipeline against silent rot.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

When a [CADDY] hint fires and the principal is confused why, /caddy-explain walks the scoring transparently — which trigger matched, what points it earned, what the threshold was, what other skills were close. Pairs with the legibility thesis. Caddy's decisions should be inspectable on demand.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

Enroll a skill into Caddy's index so it can be surfaced when the right prompt arrives. Use when a new skill is created, copied in, or when a skill needs updated triggers. Usage — "/caddy-enroll <path to SKILL.md>".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

wrg32786/aigent-os252026年10月29日 更新

查看 wrg32786 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题