跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

best-practice-research

[OMX] Bounded best-practice research wrapper using official/upstream evidence first

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather星标 335(GitHub 335 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Best-Practice Research

Use this skill when a task depends on current external best practices, version-aware guidance, standards, official recommendations, or upstream behavior. This is a workflow wrapper: it routes evidence gathering and synthesis; it is not a new research authority and it does not replace researcher.

Purpose

Produce a cited, reusable best-practice answer or handoff that separates current external evidence from repo-local facts and dependency-selection decisions. For pre-planning investigation, this is the ordinary first research wrapper: gather official/upstream evidence, then hand it to $ralplan or the caller as planning input. Do not present $best-practice-research as a final architecture component or as a validator-gated research loop.

Terminal By Default

This skill is terminal and read-only by default. It gathers evidence and produces a cited recommendation with a handoff, then stops. Do not write or edit files, create or amend commits, run mutating commands, or otherwise modify repository state under this skill — even when the question has clear implementation implications. When implementation is warranted, stop and hand off rather than continuing: name $ralplan for planning and $ultragoal, $team, or executor for execution, and resume only after the user explicitly switches to that workflow.

Activate When

  • The user asks for best practices, recommended approach, current guidance, official recommendations, standards, or version-aware external behavior.
  • $ralplan, $deep-interview, $team, or another workflow needs current external evidence before planning or execution can be correct.
  • The task involves an already chosen technology and needs authoritative usage guidance, migration notes, API behavior, lifecycle rules, or current safety guidance.

Do Not Activate When

  • The answer is fully repo-local; use explore for codebase facts.
  • The main question is whether to adopt, replace, upgrade, or compare dependencies; use dependency-expert.
  • The user only needs implementation against already-grounded requirements; use executor, $ralph, or $team as appropriate.
  • The task can be answered from stable local project conventions without current external lookup.

Specialist Routing

  1. Use explore first for brownfield facts: current code usage, local constraints, versions, config, and integration points.
  2. Use researcher for official/upstream docs, release notes, standards, migration guides, source-backed examples, and current best-practice evidence for an already chosen technology.
  3. Use dependency-expert only for adoption/upgrade/replacement/comparison decisions.
  4. Return to the caller with explicit evidence, uncertainty, and any implementation handoff constraints.

Source-Quality Rules

  • Prefer official documentation, upstream source, release notes, changelogs, standards, and maintainer guidance.
  • Include source URLs for material claims.
  • State date/version context for current best-practice claims.
  • Label third-party summaries as supplemental; do not use them before official/upstream sources.
  • Flag stale, conflicting, undocumented, or version-mismatched evidence.
  • Do not over-fetch: gather the smallest evidence set that can support the decision.

Workflow

  1. Classify the question: conceptual best practice, implementation guidance, migration/version guidance, standards/compliance guidance, or mixed local + external guidance.
  2. Gather repo-local facts with explore when local usage or constraints affect the answer.
  3. Gather external evidence with researcher when current or version-aware practice affects correctness.
  4. Synthesize a concise answer with source quality, version/date context, caveats, and an implementation or planning handoff.
  5. Stop when the answer is grounded enough for the caller; otherwise report the exact blocker or specialist handoff needed.

Output Contract

## Best-Practice Research: <question>

### Direct Recommendation
<actionable guidance or decision support>

### Evidence Used
- Official/upstream: <source URL> — <what it establishes>
- Supplemental, if any: <source URL> — <why it is secondary>

### Version / Date Context
<versions, dates, release channels, or unknowns>

### Repo-Local Context
<facts from explore, or "not needed">

### Boundaries / Non-goals
<what this research does not decide>

### Handoff
<planning/execution/test implications; name the next workflow — `$ralplan` for planning, `$ultragoal`/`$team`/`executor` for execution — and note that this skill stops here unless the user explicitly switches workflows>

Stop Rules

  • Stop after a source-backed recommendation is reusable by the caller.
  • Stop and route upward if the task becomes dependency comparison, broad architecture, or implementation.
  • Do not continue researching when remaining work would only polish wording rather than change the recommendation.
  • This skill never implements. After delivering the recommendation and handoff, stop; do not modify repo files or repo state. Resume only when the user explicitly switches to a planning or implementation workflow named in the handoff.

Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

[OMX] Run an anti-slop cleanup/refactor/deslop workflow

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather3352026年10月14日 更新

analyze

免费

[OMX] Run read-only deep repository analysis and return a ranked synthesis with explicit confidence, concrete file references, and clear evidence-vs-inference boundaries. Use when a user says 'analyze', 'investigate', 'why does', 'what's causing', or needs grounded cross-file explanation before any changes are proposed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather3352026年10月14日 更新

ask

免费

[OMX] Ask a local external advisor CLI (Claude or Gemini) and capture a reusable artifact

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather3352026年10月14日 更新

autopilot

免费

[OMX] Strict autonomous loop: $deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal (+ $team if needed) -> $code-review -> $ultraqa

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather3352026年10月14日 更新

[OMX] Stateful validator-gated research loop with native-hook persistence

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather3352026年10月14日 更新

[OMX] Durable professor-critic research workflow over Codex goal mode without reviving deprecated omx autoresearch

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

yangyuan-zhen/PolyWeather3352026年10月14日 更新

查看 yangyuan-zhen 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题