跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

autopilot

Take an idea or issue through requirements clarification, reviewed planning, implementation, and verification. Supervise all stages in one recoverable OMX workflow, preserving artifacts and progress so work can resume or return to planning when findings require changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

[OMX] Canonical autonomous orchestrator: $deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Deliver an issue from requirements clarification through verification
  • Turn an initial idea into a reviewed implementation plan
  • Resume interrupted work from its saved phase
  • Revise a plan after review or QA findings

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Autopilot

<Purpose> Autopilot is the first-class canonical orchestrator for hands-off delivery. Its defining default chain is mandatory:
$deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal

The chain is not a list of optional hints and Autopilot is not an alias for direct execution. Autopilot supervises each child stage in one recoverable session, carries durable artifacts forward, and continues through implementation verification until the requested outcome is complete or a genuine blocker is recorded. </Purpose>

<Use_When>

  • The user explicitly invokes $autopilot.
  • The user asks for end-to-end autonomous delivery from an idea, issue, or requirements seed.
  • The work needs requirements clarification, consensus planning, durable execution, and evidence-backed completion as one supervised workflow. </Use_When>

<Default_Chain> Run or resume these stages in order:

  1. deep-interview — clarify intent, scope, non-goals, constraints, acceptance criteria, and unresolved decisions. Produce a durable requirements/specification handoff. Deep Interview is a real stage; do not replace it with a one-question check or skip it merely because the task looks actionable.
  2. ralplan — turn the clarified requirements into an execution-ready consensus plan with architecture, sequencing, test, and verification guidance. Preserve review evidence as lifecycle evidence, not host-issued security authority.
  3. ultragoal — execute the approved plan through durable goals and ledger receipts, implementation, focused verification, cleanup, review, and terminal evidence.

$team, $code-review, and $ultraqa may be used inside the supervised execution when the active Ultragoal plan or verification boundary requires them. They do not replace or weaken the defining three-stage chain.

When review or QA proves the requirements or plan wrong, keep Autopilot active, return its supervised phase to ralplan, attach the findings, and continue through ultragoal again. Implementation-only review fixes may remain within Ultragoal's blocker/review loop. </Default_Chain>

<Execution_Policy>

  • Autopilot MUST begin at deep-interview for a new run and MUST preserve the phase order deep-interview -> ralplan -> ultragoal.
  • Child stages are supervised phases, not peer workflow activations. Keep mode:"autopilot" active and update current_phase rather than replacing Autopilot with standalone child state.
  • Use the current CLI state SSOT (omx state ... --json) and the current session-scoped state root. Do not create a second writer or revive legacy root-state authority.
  • Local artifacts, prompts, trackers, transcripts, environment values, and role labels are lifecycle evidence only. Do not reintroduce the retired unrecoverable host-receipt lock or terminalize the workflow because host provenance is unavailable.
  • Authority-decreasing operations are always recoverable: $cancel, state clear, hook disable/uninstall recovery, and stale-state repair must remain available without completion receipts or child-stage approval.
  • Continue automatically through safe, reversible stage transitions. Stop only for an explicit user cancellation, a human-only dependency, or a verified terminal result. </Execution_Policy>

<State_Management> Autopilot state is session-scoped and owned by the canonical state writer. A new run records at least:

{
  "mode": "autopilot",
  "active": true,
  "current_phase": "deep-interview",
  "iteration": 1,
  "phase_cycle": ["deep-interview", "ralplan", "ultragoal"],
  "handoff_artifacts": {
    "deep_interview": null,
    "ralplan": null,
    "ultragoal": null
  },
  "return_to_ralplan_reason": null
}

Start or update state only through the CLI-first state surface:

omx state write --input '{"mode":"autopilot","active":true,"current_phase":"deep-interview","state":{"phase_cycle":["deep-interview","ralplan","ultragoal"],"handoff_artifacts":{"deep_interview":null,"ralplan":null,"ultragoal":null},"return_to_ralplan_reason":null}}' --json

Stage transitions:

  • deep-interview -> ralplan: require a durable clarified requirements/specification artifact and a non-empty completion rationale. Preserve same-session question evidence when a question surface was used.
  • ralplan -> ultragoal: require durable planning artifacts, sequential Architect then Critic approvals, and a session/review-cycle-bound ralplan_execution_handoff. For supervised Autopilot, the explicit Autopilot request is the source of that bound handoff. Ordinary progression MUST NOT depend on a host-issued consensus receipt; missing host provenance is not a blocker.
  • ultragoal -> complete: require durable goal/ledger completion receipts and fresh verification evidence matching the requested outcome.
  • review/QA loopback: keep Autopilot active, set current_phase:"ralplan", and persist return_to_ralplan_reason plus the findings.
  • cancellation: run $cancel; preserve handoff artifacts for inspection or resume and mark the exact session terminal without deleting unrelated state.
  • clear/recovery: exact-session clear may remove corrupt or stale Autopilot state. It must not require forward-progression evidence and must not clear other skills or sessions. </State_Management>

<Continuation_And_Resume> When the user says continue, resume, or keep going, read the current session's autopilot-state.json and continue from current_phase:

  • deep-interview: resume clarification and produce the requirements handoff.
  • ralplan: resume consensus planning from the deep-interview artifact and any loopback findings.
  • ultragoal: resume durable execution from the approved plan and ledger.
  • complete: report the terminal evidence; do not restart.
  • cancelled, cleared, or failed: report preserved artifacts and start a new run only on a new explicit Autopilot request.

Never discard valid handoff artifacts or restart discovery merely because the conversation resumed. </Continuation_And_Resume>

<Recovery_Contract> Autopilot continuation hooks may nudge an active non-terminal run, but they MUST fail open for recovery:

  • A stale, malformed, cancelled, cleared, complete, or foreign-session state must not keep Stop blocked.
  • $cancel, exact-session state clear, and setup hook disable/uninstall paths must remain executable while Autopilot is active or damaged.
  • Continuation must be bounded and session-scoped; never recreate an unconditional hook lock. </Recovery_Contract>

<Final_Checklist>

  • A new run started with deep-interview.
  • Deep Interview produced a durable clarified requirements/specification handoff.
  • Ralplan produced an execution-ready plan with lifecycle review evidence.
  • Ultragoal completed the plan with durable goals and ledger receipts.
  • Verification evidence covers the requested behavior, failure paths, and recovery paths.
  • Missing host provenance did not block ordinary progression, cancel, clear, or hook recovery.
  • Autopilot state is terminal and exact-session artifacts remain coherent. </Final_Checklist>
<Examples> <Good> User: `$autopilot implement issue #42` Flow: activate Autopilot at `deep-interview`, crystallize requirements, continue to supervised `ralplan`, then supervised `ultragoal`, verify the completed outcome, and mark the exact session complete. </Good> <Good> User: `continue` Context: Autopilot state has `current_phase:"ralplan"`. Flow: resume the existing plan from the deep-interview handoff; do not create a separate standalone Ralplan run. </Good> <Bad> Flow: treat `$deep-interview`, `$ralplan`, and `$ultragoal` as optional suggestions and jump directly to implementation. Why bad: this hollows out Autopilot's defining orchestration contract. </Bad> </Examples>

Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Clean up working code by identifying duplication, dead code, unnecessary layers, and error paths that hide failures. Preserve behavior with targeted tests, simplify the requested files in stages, and report verification results and remaining risks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Simplify bloated or repetitive AI-generated code
  • Remove unused code and unnecessary wrappers
  • Review fallback paths that hide errors
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4万2026年10月18日 更新

analyze

免费

Investigate repository behavior, architecture, or possible causes without changing files. Trace relevant code and supporting material, then rank explanations by evidence and confidence, with concrete file references and clear distinctions between observations, conclusions, and unresolved questions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigate possible causes of a bug
  • Understand behavior across multiple files
  • Explain architecture and tradeoffs
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4万2026年10月18日 更新

ask

免费

Ask Claude or Gemini through a locally installed command-line tool for focused questions, reviews, brainstorming, or second opinions. Save the prompt, original response, summary, and next steps in a reusable Markdown file.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Get a second opinion on a proposed approach
  • Ask Claude or Gemini to review work
  • Save brainstorming results for later use
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4万2026年10月18日 更新

Run a persistent research workflow with a defined goal and explicit acceptance checks. It saves progress and finishes only when a recorded result passes either a validation script or an architect review of the research output.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Research with explicit acceptance criteria
  • Verify research results with a script
  • Require review approval before completing research
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4万2026年10月18日 更新

Find the replacement for a research command removed in OMX 0.21. This migration notice directs existing autoresearch-goal usage to $autoresearch, the canonical research loop that requires validation before proceeding.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Check the replacement for a removed research command
  • Update requests to use $autoresearch
  • Confirm which command owns the research mission lifecycle
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4万2026年10月18日 更新

Research recommended practices for a chosen technology using official documentation and maintainer sources. Get a cited recommendation that explains version context, local project constraints, uncertainties, and the next steps for planning or implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Check official guidance for a chosen technology
  • Research version-specific migration advice
  • Gather evidence before implementation planning
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4万2026年10月18日 更新

查看 Yeachan-Heo 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题