跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

robustness-checker

Design and run risk-targeted robustness, sensitivity, error, and baseline checks for an approved mathematical model, emitting compact machine evidence in lean mode and a final report in submission mode.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Purpose

Test the claims most likely to fail. Choose checks from the model's assumptions and decision risks rather than filling a generic checklist.

Preconditions

  • Approved main and usable baseline executed.
  • Run summary, method card, probe summary, and relevant outputs exist.
  • Claim or decision to be tested is known.

Workflow

  1. Identify load-bearing assumptions and claims.
  2. Select applicable checks:
    • parameter or weight perturbation;
    • alternate split or resampling;
    • seed stability;
    • outlier/missing-data treatment;
    • constraint/capacity perturbation;
    • baseline comparison;
    • output concentration/rank stability;
    • error and uncertainty analysis.
  3. State perturbation ranges and why they are meaningful before interpreting results.
  4. Run checks with fixed seeds where stochastic.
  5. Save compact metrics to:

robustness/Qx/qx_robustness_summary.json

  1. In submission, also save:

robustness/Qx/qx_robustness_report.md

  1. If the stability verdict affects method continuation or claim scope, invoke one choice card and log the human answer in qx_decisions.jsonl.

Summary Contract

Record:

  • tested claim/assumption;
  • input and result source paths;
  • perturbation;
  • metric and threshold if predeclared;
  • observed value;
  • status PASS, CONDITIONAL, or FAIL;
  • limitation;
  • fallback-trigger relevance.

Rules

  • Do not run irrelevant checks merely to reach a count.
  • Do not invent a threshold after seeing the result without labeling it exploratory.
  • Do not convert stability metrics into the human confidence verdict.
  • Do not create robustness-checker_modeler_decision.md.
  • A failed robustness check is evidence for adjust/fallback/claim downgrade, not permission for AI to decide.

Verification

  • Every major final claim has a supporting check or explicit limitation.
  • Perturbations are justified and reproducible.
  • Baseline and main comparisons remain metric-compatible.
  • Concentration/degeneracy risks are revisited when relevant.
  • Submission report sources its numbers from the summary and experiment artifacts.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills10612026年9月24日 更新

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills10612026年9月24日 更新

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills10612026年9月24日 更新

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills10612026年9月24日 更新

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills10612026年9月24日 更新

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills10612026年9月24日 更新

查看 zhnnky329 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题