跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

writing-plans

Use when a bounded Yardlet task needs a concrete implementation plan before code changes

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md934 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Writing Task-Internal Plans

Purpose

Turn one accepted Yardlet task into a small, testable implementation plan. The intent contract and work queue already own project-level decomposition. Do not replace them, expand the task, or create a second queue.

Scope First

  1. Read the task's allowed scope, exclusions, acceptance criteria, and anchors.
  2. List the files and interfaces likely to change.
  3. Stop and report a blocker if acceptance requires work outside the contract.
  4. Put adjacent ideas in the handoff or follow-up candidates, never into the active implementation plan.

Plan Shape

Write the plan in the worker's normal progress channel unless the task requires a durable plan file. Each step must contain:

  • one independently checkable outcome;
  • exact files or interfaces involved;
  • the narrow validation that proves the step;
  • dependencies on earlier steps;
  • any safety or no-clobber constraint that applies.

Prefer the smallest useful sequence:

  1. Add or identify a failing check for the required behavior.
  2. Make the minimal implementation change.
  3. Run the narrow check.
  4. Run the relevant regression suite.
  5. Compare the actual result with every acceptance criterion.

Concrete Detail

A useful plan names real paths, types, commands, and expected results. Avoid placeholders such as TODO, "handle edge cases", or "add tests" without naming the behavior and proof. Follow existing repository patterns and avoid unrelated refactors.

Review Boundary

Use plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md to check the completed plan against the task contract. If independent review is required, represent it as a normal Yardlet queue task with kind: review; do not invent another execution mechanism.

Completion Checklist

  • Every acceptance criterion maps to at least one plan step and validation.
  • Every changed file is inside allowed scope.
  • The plan does not duplicate project-level queue decomposition.
  • Commands are concrete and expected outcomes are stated.
  • Out-of-scope ideas remain outside the implementation steps.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

atomic-write no-op 증명은 inode 비교로

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月19日 更新

availability 표시 게이트는 실행 의미 공급자와 교차 대조

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月19日 更新

base 전진 시 retained worktree diff의 3-way 재이식

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月19日 更新

builtin-bundle-reverify

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月19日 更新

builtin-bundle-reverify에 CLI fixture leg 절차 추가

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月19日 更新

codex CLI 플래그 실재는 설치된 바이너리 help로 검증

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月19日 更新

查看 zzunkie 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题