デザインのスキル

Use when you need to design, review, or improve validation in Micronaut applications — including Bean Validation on @Controller methods, @Body @Valid, query/path parameter validation, @ConfigurationProperties validation, custom constraints, nested DTO validation, and ExceptionHandler mapping for constraint violations. This should trigger for requests such as Add validation support in Micronaut; Review Micronaut validation rules; Improve request validation in Micronaut REST APIs; Add custom validation constraints in Micronaut; Validate Micronaut configuration properties. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve validation in Spring Boot applications — including Bean Validation on request DTOs, @Valid/@Validated at API boundaries, constraint groups, custom constraints, @ConfigurationProperties validation, nested DTO validation, and consistent validation error handling. This should trigger for requests such as Add validation support in Spring Boot; Review Spring Boot validation rules; Improve request validation in Spring Boot REST APIs; Add custom Bean Validation constraints in Spring Boot; Validate configuration properties in Spring Boot. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve validation in Quarkus applications — including Bean Validation on JAX-RS resources, @Valid on parameters and CDI beans, constraint groups, @ConfigMapping validation, custom constraints, nested DTO validation, and ExceptionMapper-based error mapping. This should trigger for requests such as Add validation support in Quarkus; Review Quarkus validation rules; Improve request validation in Quarkus REST APIs; Add custom validation constraints in Quarkus; Validate Quarkus @ConfigMapping properties. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need MongoDB persistence in Quarkus — including Panache Mongo entities/repositories, document design, indexes, transactions where applicable, and error handling. This should trigger for requests such as Add MongoDB in Quarkus; Review Quarkus Mongo Panache design; Improve Mongo error handling in Quarkus services; Model MongoDB documents for a Quarkus service; Configure Quarkus MongoDB clients codecs or transactions. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to select, review, or implement Java design and integration patterns — including classic Java design patterns, REST API patterns, Kafka and event-driven patterns, database and persistence patterns, and cross-cutting integration patterns. This should trigger for requests such as Apply Java design patterns; Review REST API patterns; Design Kafka event-driven patterns; Improve database persistence patterns; Add resilient integration patterns. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a complex or risky code change should be split into Kent Beck's two-step method by first making the change easy through behavior-preserving preparatory refactoring, then making the intended behavior change once the design supports it. This should trigger for requests such as Apply two-step change; Make this risky change safer; Refactor before changing behavior; Separate preparation from behavior change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or updating OpenSpec artifacts from an issue, plan, approved design, ADRs, existing OpenSpec, or a valid combination. The workflow assesses reviewable scope, records source authority and derivation, handles conflicts, and prevents silent synchronization. Triggers include Create OpenSpec from an issue; Convert a plan into OpenSpec; Update an OpenSpec change; Split broad requirements into reviewable changes. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review breaking changes in this spec; Check compatibility risks; Avoid breaking changes in this OpenSpec change; Review migration impact before release; Assess command and skill compatibility. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, testing, or cleaning up feature toggles, feature flags, kill switches, runtime configuration gates, canary controls, staged rollouts, experiments, or temporary compatibility switches in Java enterprise systems. This should trigger for requests such as Design a feature toggle strategy; Review this feature flag; Add a kill switch safely; Test toggle on and off paths; Clean up an expired feature toggle; Plan controlled rollout and rollback behavior. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or refining a structured Java implementation plan from trusted issue summaries, approved designs, ADRs, OpenSpec changes, existing plans, or a valid combination. The plan records its source artifacts and derivation direction and can remain the execution artifact without requiring OpenSpec. This should trigger for requests such as Create a plan from an issue; Create a plan from OpenSpec; Design an implementation plan; Refine an existing plan. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a large feature, story, plan, or spec idea needs to be split into small vertical slices with the Hamburger Method. This should trigger for requests such as Split this oversized story; Find the smallest useful slice; Break this feature into vertical slices; Apply the Hamburger Method; Turn this broad plan into tracked slices. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect tasks that diverge from the execution goal; Explain what is missing, vague, ambiguous, partial, absent, or divergent in this OpenSpec change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java implementation work should be guided by Test-Driven Development, including maintaining a test list, choosing the next behavior, writing a failing test first, implementing only enough production code to pass, and refactoring while keeping tests green. This should trigger for requests such as Apply TDD; Use test-driven development; Drive this Java change with tests; Write the failing test first; Red-green-refactor this feature. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for type design quality — including establishing clear type hierarchies, applying consistent naming conventions, eliminating primitive obsession with domain-specific value objects, leveraging generic type parameters, creating type-safe wrappers, designing fluent interfaces, ensuring precision-appropriate numeric types (BigDecimal for financial calculations), and improving type contrast through interfaces and method signature alignment. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for type design; Improve type design in Java code; Fix primitive obsession in Java code; Create value objects in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception contracts. Triggers include review Java OOD, refactor Java OOD, improve Java OOD, fix OOP misuse, and identify Java code smells. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a database schema or data-meaning change needs Parallel Change, including expand, migrate, and contract sequencing for column renames, type or data reinterpretation, large-table backfills, relationship-table changes, enum/status transitions, timezone/default changes, and index or uniqueness changes. This should trigger before framework-specific Flyway implementation guidance when deciding whether a migration needs a compatibility window or whether a simpler migration is sufficient. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's rules; Choose between these refactoring options; Keep this Java design simple. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem under exploration needs its surrounding system context identified before design begins — Existing systems, Integrations, Ownership, and External dependencies. This should trigger when an issue's Context Mapping point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to map the systems, integrations, owners, and external dependencies relevant to a problem. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a CLI interface: args, flags, help, output, errors, exit codes, config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。