調査、論文、教育、資格学習（4,110 件）
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Cardiovascular Technologist — measuring and grading a cardiac or vascular ultrasound finding, tracking contrast/anticoagulation/radiation limits during a live cath lab procedure, choosing between imaging modalities for a clinical question, or writing up a diagnostic study for physician sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education Teacher, Postsecondary — defending a shrinking trade or health-science program against a cutback decision, backward-mapping a shop or lab curriculum to an industry credential's exam blueprint, resolving a competency-based grading dispute where a passing average hides a failed safety check-off, or setting the terms of an advisory-committee review or work-based-learning placement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a bioinformatics technician — running or QC-gating a next-generation sequencing pipeline, triaging a failed or borderline sequencing run, deciding whether a variant call set is clinically/research reportable, or writing a sample-level QC report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Administrative Law Judge, Adjudicator, or Hearing Officer — applying a mandatory sequential/structured evaluation framework in required order, weighing conflicting medical or vocational opinion evidence using specific regulatory factors, writing findings that explicitly address significant contrary evidence in the record, drafting a credibility/consistency finding tied to specific record citations, or checking whether a draft decision would survive substantial-evidence review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adapted Physical Education Specialist — writing a legally-defensible PE present level and annual goal from motor/fitness assessment data, choosing the right test battery and alternate items for a student's mobility profile, recommending a placement step on the PE least-restrictive-environment continuum, or distinguishing a motor/balance deficit from a behavioral avoidance pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track or tenured Agricultural Sciences faculty member at a land-grant university — deciding whether to submit a grant this cycle versus wait, allocating time across the teaching/research/extension appointment split, diagnosing a stalled graduate student or field trial, or drafting a tenure-and-promotion dossier narrative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ENCODE functional genomics data for disease mechanism research. Use when the user wants to connect GWAS variants to regulatory elements, annotate disease-associated loci with functional data, identify therapeutic targets from epigenomic data, build disease regulatory models, cross-reference with clinical trials and drug databases, or conduct any disease-focused, pathology-driven, or clinical variant interpretation workflow. Covers the full pipeline from disease-tissue mapping through GWAS variant annotation, heritability enrichment, cancer epigenomics, drug target identification, and clinical trial cross-referencing. Integrates ENCODE with Open Targets, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check Spring Boot skill content freshness against latest research and flag skills needing updates. Use when running /spring-refresh, or when user mentions "refresh spring skills", "spring boot update check", "skill freshness", "stale spring content", "update spring boot skills".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep research on technical topics using EXA tools with intelligent two-tier caching. Use when user asks to research a topic, investigate best practices, look up information, find patterns, or explore architectures. Also invoked by /research command. Triggers: "research", "look up", "investigate", "deep dive", "find information about", "what are best practices for", "how do others implement".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and enforce standard YAML frontmatter on research documents with JD-aware path resolution. Use when creating, editing, or validating research files, when user mentions "research metadata", "research frontmatter", "research staleness", "validate research", "RD-rules", or "research docs validation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
对任何主题进行系统调研，自动产出图文并茂的 Markdown 文档（含 Mermaid 结构图 + qwen-image 可视化），保存到认知结构对应维度的知识库，并自动注册到文档分类清单和知识图谱。当用户说「帮我调研/调研一下/系统调研/研究一下/帮我系统了解/深度研究 [主题]」时触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs broad parallel research across many independent inputs with a shared output schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-spectrum product research pipeline. Runs competitive analysis, technology trend scouting, user feedback analysis, and feature ideation. Triggers: on: research, competitive research, market research, feature discovery, what should we build next.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a full retrospective and dev cycle analysis. Chains /recall → /new-features to reconstruct what went wrong, extract lessons learned, identify rework patterns, and synthesize feature ideas from the findings. Triggers: retrospective, retro, dev cycle analysis, what went wrong, lessons learned, postmortem, sprint retro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze learning management and training pathway systems for prerequisite mapping, competency-based progression, adaptive sequencing, and credential stacking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive K-12 or higher-ed system analysis: predict student dropout risk with early warning indicators, optimize curriculum alignment and pacing, personalize learning paths for at-risk and diverse populations, and audit school operations for resource efficiency..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run multi-source web research with adversarial verification and produce a cited report: decomposes the question into 3-6 distinct queries (broad, specific, comparative, recency-anchored), searches and ranks sources by authority, recency, and specificity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze university and research institution funding allocation systems including RCM revenue attribution, performance-based budgeting, faculty startup package management, F&A indirect cost recovery distribution, equipment sharing and core facility recharge rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track brand mentions, URL citations, and share-of-voice across the 2026 AI search surface — ChatGPT (with browsing), Perplexity, Claude (with search), Google Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, You.com, Phind, and Microsoft Copilot..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive intelligence and market positioning analysis. Researches competitors, compares features, pricing, and tech stacks, then produces a prioritized gap analysis with actionable roadmap..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a literature review. Use when the user says "literature review", "lit review", "review the literature", "summarize prior research", "what does the research say about", "synthesize research on", "background section", "related work section", "what has been studied on this topic", or needs to systematically identify, synthesize, and critically evaluate existing research on a topic - even if they don't explicitly say "literature review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。