テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証（1.4万 件）
Review common AI slops of defensive programming patterns, avoid silent errors. TRIGGER when reviewing code for defensive anti-patterns, writing fail-fast code, or auditing error handling quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. TRIGGER when user requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "debug this in browser", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "frontend UI/UX aesthetics", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safe testing practices to prevent real-world side-effects. TRIGGER when user asks to "run tests", "test this", "write tests", "debug", "mock", "fixture", "integration test", "unit test", or when testing code that touches network, database, filesystem, or external services. Use BEFORE executing any test that could affect production systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect and diagnose minimal-zine posters, photo restyles, editorial images, and social-card series for subject preservation, factual and text integrity, composition, paper realism, print-process coherence, color signal, anti-AI craft, platform fit, and series continuity. Use when the user asks whether an image has高级感, feels AI-generated, matches Paper Signal or gc-minimal-zine quality, needs improvement, or should be regenerated. Returns evidence-based findings and a targeted correction prompt; regenerates only when the user also asks for a fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6-pillar architecture review framework. Adapted from AWS Well-Architected for use by great_cto's architect agent on every non-nano ARCH document. Forces explicit answers across operational excellence, security, reliability, performance, cost, and sustainability — not just feature design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The pinned default technology stack for SMB Product-Builder products. One source of truth so the architect, app-scaffolder, auth-engineer, and senior-dev never re-decide the stack per build — they build ON it. Covers framework, ORM/DB, auth, UI, payments/email/SMS, files, jobs, testing, hosting, and observability, with the chosen default + the one sanctioned alternative for each. Applied whenever a new product is scaffolded or a stack choice would otherwise be improvised. Re-deciding the stack every build is the biggest silent time sink; this kills it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coverage-design method for qa-engineer — pyramid ratios per archetype, equivalence/boundary/property case selection, mutation score as the real coverage signal, and a flake-quarantine policy. Turns "coverage is 90%" (a number with no method) into a defensible test plan. Emits TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md, which the QA gate checks exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
What to do the moment a secret is exposed — pasted into chat, committed, logged, shown in a transcript or a screenshot. The secret is compromised; only revoking and rotating it helps. Turns it into one tracked task with an escalation, not a reminder repeated every session. Use when you see a key, token, password or private key anywhere it should not be ("ключ в чате", "токен в логах", "закоммитил .env"). Loaded by security-officer, l3-support, devops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness under overlapping labels, fractional differentiation, meta-labelling, and multiple-testing correction. Written because the invariants were required of quant-researcher and nothing in the project explained how to satisfy them: a rule without a method produces either an invention or a block. Applied whenever a backtest, a feature or a label is being designed or judged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a website against the Forter Agentic Readiness Guide. Loads the 25 weighted rubrics in `audit/`, probes the target site (and optional source code), scores each guideline Pass/Partial/Fail/N/A with sub-check granularity, and produces a prioritized fix report. Use when a user asks "score my site against the agentic readiness guide", "audit https://… for agent readiness", or "what do I need to fix to be agent-ready".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
S5 of see-it-ship-it: prove it works before saying so. Silent quality checks after every feature, a full review of every file before save and deploy, and the acceptance table (check / expected / actual / match) run on the local build and again on the live URL. Never 'tests passed'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate engine-specific test helper libraries for the project's test suite. Reads existing test patterns and produces tests/helpers/ with assertion utilities, factory functions, and mock objects tailored to the project's systems. Reduces boilerplate in new test files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the critical path smoke test gate before QA hand-off. Executes the automated test suite, verifies core functionality, and produces a PASS/FAIL report. Run after a sprint's stories are implemented and before manual QA begins. A failed smoke check means the build is not ready for QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the combat team: coordinates game-designer, gameplay-programmer, ai-programmer, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to design, implement, and validate a combat feature end-to-end.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate skill files for structural compliance and behavioral correctness. Three modes: static (linter), spec (behavioral), audit (coverage report).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold the test framework and CI/CD pipeline for the project's engine. Creates the tests/ directory structure, engine-specific test runner configuration, and GitHub Actions workflow. Run once during Technical Setup phase before the first sprint begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve a skill using a test-fix-retest loop. Runs static checks, proposes targeted fixes, rewrites the skill, re-tests, and keeps or reverts based on score change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。