テスト・セキュリティのスキル

Kurz gesagt: LLM-Sicherheit schützt Anwendungen mit großen Sprachmodellen vor Angriffen wie Prompt I

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt Injection Defense 2026: 8 Tested Techniques … — 20. Apr. 2026 · Prompt injection is still the

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt Engineering Is Dead in 2025 Introduction Prompt engineering, once hailed as the essential ski

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous by Design, Uncontrolled in Practice 2026-09-08 Executive Summary Between July 9 and Augus

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PVDetector, a training-free framework that detects PI attacks during LLM inference by measuring hidd GAP: no mappable capability in latest signal (our

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MetaBackdoor trains the model to activate hidden behavior when the total token count crosses a speci

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nicht böse, nur falsch optimiert: Was OpenAIs RubyGems-Vorfall über KI-Agenten und Reward-Hacking zeigt Wie OpenAIs Agenten durch Reward-Hacking eine

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM Prompt injection Share Executive Summary Palo Alto Networks has released Securing GenAI: A Com

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shaping the Safety Boundaries: Understanding and … — Vor einem Tag · Abstract Jailbreaking in Large

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for pip CVE scanning and auto-patching via OSV.dev API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dan Goodin – 8/27/2026 | 157 How OpenAI let a mob of LLM agents game a test and ransack Hugging Face Without authorization, 1,200 OpenAI agents conspi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reporting build, test, or deploy results - enforces real tool output over plausible claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for instrumental variables and treatment effect estimation. Activates when the user asks about: "instrumental variables", "IV estimation", "2SLS", "two-stage least squares", "endogeneity", "weak instruments", "first stage", "Sargan test", "overidentification", "propensity score matching", "PSM", "average treatment effect", "ATT", "LATE", "local average treatment effect", "endogenous regressor", "instrument validity", "工具变量", "两阶段最小二乘", "内生性", "弱工具变量", "倾向得分匹配", "平均处理效应", "处理效应", "局部平均处理效应"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for time series analysis. Activates when the user asks about: "time series", "stationarity", "unit root test", "ADF test", "KPSS test", "ARIMA", "ARMA", "autocorrelation", "ACF", "PACF", "VAR model", "VECM", "Granger causality", "cointegration", "impulse response function", "forecast", "seasonal decomposition", "ARCH", "GARCH", "时间序列", "平稳性检验", "单位根", "自回归", "格兰杰因果", "协整", "脉冲响应", "预测", "向量自回归"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for Synthetic Control Method (SCM). Activates when the user asks about "synthetic control", "SCM", "placebo test", "synthetic DID", "合成控制", "安慰剂检验", "合成反事实", "合成DID".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive results analysis for empirical research: generate publication-quality descriptive statistics and balance tables, interpret regression coefficients with economic magnitude and effect sizes, assess identification assumption diagnostics, and produce structured results memos. Use when asked to create summary statistics, Table 1, balance tests, interpret results, assess economic significance, or write results narratives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Econometrics skill for Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Activates when the user asks about: "regression discontinuity", "RDD", "RD design", "sharp RDD", "fuzzy RDD", "running variable", "forcing variable", "cutoff", "bandwidth selection", "local linear regression", "McCrary test", "density test", "RDROBUST", "continuity assumption", "donut hole RDD", "geographic RDD", "断点回归", "回归不连续", "运行变量", "截断值", "带宽选择", "精确断点", "模糊断点", "密度检验", "局部线性回归"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the current repo structure, build system, test setup, and conventions to provide a practical onboarding guide. Use when new to a codebase, joining a project, or wanting to understand how a repo is organized. Triggers on getting started, new to repo, onboard, how does this repo work, repo structure, codebase overview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor CI/CD checks until green or failure with auto-diagnosis, failure classification (related vs flaky vs external), self-healing fix attempts, and smart retriggers for flaky E2E tests. Use for CI monitoring, pipeline failed, build broken, flaky test, CI red, check status, watch pipeline, Buildkite, GitHub Actions, re-trigger CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn one approved topic into a curiosity-led 3D educational short with character sheets, ordered keyframes, motion clips, narration, captions, and an auditable assembly plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 (Incident Response Recommendations for Cybersecurity Risk Management). Use for CSF 2.0-aligned incident response life cycles, IR roles, Community Profile priorities for DE/RS/RC and preparation, playbooks, coordination, and continuous improvement. Covers 800-61r3 only; does not replace CSF 2.0 full text, SP 800-61r2 tactical playbooks, or sector-specific breach-notification law.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) v1.1 (SP 800-218). Use for secure software development practices, SDLC security integration, software supply chain security, vulnerability disclosure, SBOM, threat modelling, secure coding, build hardening, EO 14028 compliance. Covers the four SSDF practice groups (PO, PS, PW, RV) only; does not cover NIST CSF, SP 800-53 controls, or cloud-specific security frameworks in depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。