Detects patterns that make tests flaky and proposes stabilization steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証(1.3万 件)
Detects patterns that make tests flaky and proposes stabilization steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read the network instead of the DOM. Snoop JSON API responses, wait for a request instead of sleeping, collect items while scrolling, record a QA flight trace (jsonl, HAR, screenshots), and intercept requests with routes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and update an arbitrary codebase to follow the Code.mil federal open-source licensing model (MIT with 17 U.S.C. Section 105 disclaimers and INTENT.md), including CRAN/R package DESCRIPTION setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates account research briefs, personalized outreach sequences, persona-specific talk tracks, and objection handling frameworks for B2B SaaS BDR teams. Use when preparing BDR outreach for target accounts, building prospecting sequences, creating call scripts, developing objection responses, onboarding new BDRs, or reviewing outreach performance. Also use when asked to "write outreach emails," "build a prospecting sequence," "create a call script," "handle objections," or "research an account for outreach." Designed for BDR teams selling compliance, security, and GRC platforms to mid-market and enterprise buyers with multi-persona buying committees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates compliance, security, and GRC terminology in marketing copy. Enforces accurate claims, prevents common mistakes (e.g., calling SOC 2 a "certification"), and applies risk-first narrative framing for B2B SaaS audiences. Use when writing or reviewing any marketing content that references compliance frameworks, security standards, regulatory requirements, or audit processes. Also use when creating ads, landing pages, emails, case studies, or sales collateral for GRC/cybersecurity B2B SaaS products.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit OpenClaw frontend code and rendered interfaces for Carapace drift, token misuse, primitive reimplementation, accessibility problems, responsive defects, and off-brand copy. Use for design reviews, compliance checks, or scheduled audit-and-fix workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
自動運転モードで東京の街を走らせて画面を撮り、日本の道路交通法・道路標識令・設置基準に照らして おかしなところ(標識の向きや位置、区画線、信号、車線、速度、歩行者の動き、違反判定の誤り)を 見つけて直すループ。「AI で画面を判定して直す」「道路の見た目を法令どおりにチェック」と頼まれたとき、 または /loop で繰り返し実行するときに使う。
Simplified Japanese web application testing skill covering unit tests, E2E tests, integration tests, Japanese text validation, IME input testing, and naming conventions. Triggers on requests for Webテスト, テスト自動化, E2Eテスト, 日本語テスト, Japanese web testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a repository change for correctness, security, and maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Documentation conventions for generating high-quality AI agent skills from TypeScript source. Use when preparing a library for skill generation, auditing JSDoc quality, fixing audit warnings, writing @useWhen/@avoidWhen/@never tags, or asking about documentation conventions for skills. Use this even if the user just says 'audit my docs', 'improve my JSDoc', or 'make my skills better'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously improve an MCP skill via the skillit audit→draft→review loop (build or runtime mode) Also: skillit, refine, mcp, skill-generation, cli, audit, overlay.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Documentation conventions for generating high-quality AI agent skills from TypeScript source. Use when preparing a library for skill generation, auditing JSDoc quality, fixing audit warnings, writing @useWhen/@avoidWhen/@never tags, or asking about documentation conventions for skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap an AI-agent skill from a TypeScript codebase by running the deterministic skillit generate/audit loop and enriching repo source (JSDoc, README, config-type properties, MCP tool annotations, examples, package.json) until the skill reaches its grade target. Use for cli, typedoc, config, or mcp (build-mode) projects; never edit SKILL.md/references directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub IssueまたはタスクをPlanning→実装→Review→Test→PRの全サイクルで自動実行する
Implements BLoC (v9.x) event-driven state management for Flutter with unidirectional data flow using the flutter_bloc package. Use when implementing Bloc/Cubit classes, mapping Events to States, consuming state with BlocBuilder/BlocListener/BlocConsumer, applying event transformers (restartable/droppable/sequential) for concurrency control, setting up BlocProvider/MultiBlocProvider DI, integrating Freezed for sealed union types and exhaustive pattern matching, or testing with blocTest. Ideal for enterprise apps requiring business logic separation, precise concurrency control (search debouncing, form deduplication), or event replay debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Supabase Flutter integration for PostgreSQL, Auth, Realtime subscriptions, Storage, Edge Functions, and Row Level Security. Use when building backend features with supabase_flutter or configuring database policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Covers Flutter testing across all three layers: unit tests (business logic, ViewModels, repositories), widget tests (UI rendering, interactions, golden regression), and integration/E2E tests (full app flows, native OS interactions). Use this skill when writing any Flutter test, setting up mocking with mocktail or mockito, implementing golden file tests, debugging async failures (pumpAndSettle timeouts, Timer leaks, FakeAsync deadlocks), fixing cross-platform golden pixel diffs in CI/CD, testing state management (Riverpod/BLoC/Provider), handling permission dialogs or native system UI with Patrol, or troubleshooting MediaQuery/Theme missing errors in widget tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level guidance for Flutter production applications: architecture decisions (Clean/Layered/Hexagonal/Feature-First), advanced state management (BLoC/Riverpod/GetX), performance optimization (eliminating jank, memory profiling, reducing rebuild overhead), code review with design pattern enforcement, scalability assessments, native platform integration (MethodChannel/EventChannel/FFI), complex UI challenges (custom render objects, slivers), testing strategies (unit/widget/integration/golden), CI/CD pipeline architecture, build optimization, and accessibility compliance. Triggers: 'architecture decision', 'design pattern', 'performance issue', 'code review', 'production problem', 'scaling concerns', 'best practices', 'technical debt', 'refactoring strategy'. Essential for complex enterprise apps, critical production debugging, architectural refactors, or when choosing between competing technical approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-driven Flutter E2E testing via VM Service CLI. Control running Flutter apps in debug mode for smoke tests, regression checks, exploratory testing, and UI automation. Trigger when user mentions E2E testing, UI automation, smoke tests, integration testing, test automation, controlling Flutter apps, VM Service interaction, debugging UI flows, automated regression testing, CI sanity checks, or testing native dialogs/permissions/WebViews. Supports stateful named instances or stateless direct URI connections. Ideal for rapid test feedback, AI agent workflows, element discovery, screenshot capture, log collection, and scriptable UI interactions (tap, scroll, enterText). Use for troubleshooting flaky tests, automating repetitive manual tests, verifying app behavior after merges, or setting up automated QA pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds SEO-friendly web applications with Dart using the Jaspr framework. Use when creating Dart-based websites, blogs, or landing pages requiring semantic HTML output; implementing server-side rendering (SSR) or static site generation (SSG); adding Tailwind CSS via jaspr_tailwind; routing with jaspr_router; testing components with jaspr_test; or building full-stack Dart web apps where Flutter Web's canvas rendering is unsuitable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。