テスト・セキュリティのスキル

Comprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WPS (Wi-Fi Protected Setup) PIN attack methodology — Pixie Dust offline attack against vulnerable chipsets (Ralink, Realtek, Broadcom, MediaTek), online PIN brute-force with reaver/bully, lockout handling, time-of-day evasion, WPS push-button vulnerability windows, and PIN-to-PSK derivation. Use when a target SOHO router exposes WPS — common on consumer ISP gear, often left enabled by default even when WPS attacks have been known for over a decade.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KRACK (CVE-2017-13077..082) and FragAttacks (CVE-2020-24586..588 + 26139-26147) — key reinstallation, fragmentation, and aggregation attacks against WPA2 supplicants. Covers Vanhoef's test scripts, viability against modern patched stacks (mostly mitigated post-2021), residual unpatched embedded devices and IoT vendors, and the practical limitations of these attacks in modern engagements. Use when assessing legacy supplicants, embedded clients, or vendors with poor patch cadence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons / Mana evil twin attacks, captive-portal phishing, KRACK and FragAttacks, WPS Pixie Dust, deauthentication and disassociation attacks, rogue AP construction (hostapd-mana), 802.1X bypass, MAC randomization defeat, BLE/Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 sidebands, and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 considerations. Use when scoping wireless pentest, war-driving an estate, or testing corporate wireless segmentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mobile (Android + iOS) application penetration testing methodology. Covers static analysis (apktool/jadx for Android, class-dump/Hopper/IDA for iOS), dynamic instrumentation with Frida and Objection, SSL pinning bypass strategies, root/jailbreak detection bypass, deep-link / URL-scheme abuse, exported component attacks (Android activities, services, providers, receivers; iOS XPC, URL schemes, universal links), insecure data storage (SharedPrefs, KeyStore misuse, NSUserDefaults, Keychain ACL bypass), IPC / Intent redirection, WebView vulnerabilities (JavaScriptInterface, file:// access), Firebase/AWS/Azure misconfiguration leakage, mobile API testing, biometric/Face ID/Touch ID bypass, app-cloning and runtime patching, and mobile malware/RAT analysis primitives. Use for mobile pentest, bug bounty mobile triage, or app-store reconnaissance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Social engineering attack techniques beyond email phishing for authorized red team and physical penetration testing engagements. Covers pretexting methodology (persona creation, authority and urgency psychological triggers, rapport building), vishing (voice phishing via caller ID spoofing, IVR system exploitation, VoIP infrastructure setup with Twilio/Asterisk), smishing (SMS-based phishing, carrier gateway abuse, short code impersonation), physical social engineering (tailgating and piggybacking, RFID badge cloning with Proxmark3, lock picking and bypass, dumpster diving for sensitive documents), USB drop attacks (Rubber Ducky keystroke injection, Bash Bunny multi-vector payloads, O.MG cable covert implants, BadUSB firmware attacks), watering hole attack planning and execution, and OSINT-driven targeting (LinkedIn harvesting, organizational chart reconstruction, employee pattern analysis). Integrates with the Social Engineering Toolkit for attack automation, Proxmark3 for RFID/NFC cloning, USB Rubber Ducky and Bash Bunny for physical payload delivery, and BeEF for browser exploitation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1598 (Phishing for Information), T1566 (Phishing), T1091 (Replication Through Removable Media), and T1189 (Drive-by Compromise). All techniques require explicit written authorization and defined rules of engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phishing campaign execution methodology for authorized red team engagements. Covers end-to-end campaign lifecycle: infrastructure provisioning (GoPhish, SMTP relay configuration, domain acquisition and aging, SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment), payload delivery vectors (Office macro weaponization, HTA droppers, ISO/IMG container abuse, LNK shortcut hijacking, OneNote embedded payloads, HTML smuggling), email authentication bypass techniques (SPF softfail exploitation, DKIM replay attacks, display name spoofing, homoglyph and cousin domain registration), credential harvesting with MFA bypass (EvilGinx2 transparent proxy, Modlishka session relay, pixel-perfect HTML cloning), spear phishing pretext development informed by OSINT, email security gateway evasion, QR code phishing (quishing), and callback phishing for initial access. Integrates with GoPhish for campaign management, EvilGinx2 for adversary-in-the-middle credential interception, King Phisher for template design, and the Social Engineering Toolkit for payload generation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1566 (Phishing) and sub-techniques T1566.001 (Spearphishing Attachment), T1566.002 (Spearphishing Link), T1566.003 (Spearphishing via Service). Assumes you have written authorization and a defined scope before any campaign execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring or installing a rig bundle (packaged, shareable artifact that instantiates an opinionated OpenRig topology + workflow), reasoning about the bundle vs extension boundary, or auditing a bundle for portability. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent bundles from working anywhere but the operator's machine, and the inspect-before-install discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing OpenRig's own source in a clone of the openrig repository: finding which package or file owns a behaviour, choosing which tests to run, testing a change without disturbing the OpenRig daemon your own session runs on, judging whether a diff touches a high-risk area, or preparing a pull request. Not for operating rigs (openrig-skills) or designing rig topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YC-style product validation using six forcing questions. Pressure-tests a feature idea before it becomes a requirement — ensuring real demand, a clear wedge, and evidence behind assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a development pod begins or hands off implementation, QA, or design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex plugin in engineer-friendly language. Use when the user says "evaluate this plugin", "audit this plugin", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", "help me benchmark this plugin", or asks for a plugin-wide report before comparing versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing existing Public Equity Investing models or spreadsheets. Do not use to build a new model from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building public-equity DCF valuation workbooks. Default to the banker formula workbook path for new model builds; use deterministic exports only for controlled support calculations or explicit lightweight runs. Do not use for standalone workbook audits; use model-audit-tieout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce Public Equity Investing comparable-company valuation in report or workbook mode. Use for peer selection, multiple analysis, valuation read-throughs, implied prices, comps dashboards, Excel or Sheets comps, refreshable peer tables, model updates, and comps workbook QA. Do not use for DCF-only, credit-security, or generic market commentary requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning a public-equity base case, model, thesis, event, or catalyst into scenario skew, sensitivity, breakpoint, and PM action-threshold analysis. Do not use for first-pass model builds, credit-security valuation, or generic planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex skill in engineer-friendly terms. Use when the user says "evaluate this skill", "give me an analysis of the game dev skill", "audit this skill", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", or asks for a skill-specific report before benchmarking it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely update public-company Excel model copies from source-to-model maps; emits XLSX as the hero artifact and CSV/log/manifest as support. Do not use for pure earnings notes or broad workbook audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。