テスト・セキュリティのスキル

Analyze product data and manage product tooling in PostHog. Use when the user wants product analytics or insights, HogQL/SQL queries, feature flags, experiments and A/B tests, error tracking, session replay, surveys, LLM analytics, dashboards, data warehouse, or PostHog documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect a ChatGPT Apps MCP server codebase and generate chatgpt-app-submission.json with app info suggestions, tool hint justifications, test cases, and negative test cases, then report review-check findings and outputSchema warnings for submission review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building public-equity DCF valuation workbooks. Default to the banker formula workbook path for new model builds; use deterministic exports only for controlled support calculations or explicit lightweight runs. Do not use for standalone workbook audits; use model-audit-tieout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning a public-equity base case, model, thesis, event, or catalyst into scenario skew, sensitivity, breakpoint, and PM action-threshold analysis. Do not use for first-pass model builds, credit-security valuation, or generic planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route Public Equity Investing workflows for listed-company and public-security research, earnings analysis, valuation, model updates, long/short pitches, catalysts, thesis tracking, ETF/index and constituent diligence, position sizing, hedging, dashboards, and investment memos. Use when the user is evaluating a public company, ticker, sector, portfolio position, event, earnings setup, or investment thesis through an investor lens, including what is priced in, what is mispriced, what proves or kills the thesis, and what to watch next. Do not use for private-company diligence, credit-first analysis, personal financial advice, generic company summaries, or generic document drafting with no public-equity investment context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing existing Public Equity Investing models or spreadsheets. Do not use to build a new model from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex skill in engineer-friendly terms. Use when the user says "evaluate this skill", "give me an analysis of the game dev skill", "audit this skill", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", or asks for a skill-specific report before benchmarking it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely update public-company Excel model copies from source-to-model maps; emits XLSX as the hero artifact and CSV/log/manifest as support. Do not use for pure earnings notes or broad workbook audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce Public Equity Investing comparable-company valuation in report or workbook mode. Use for peer selection, multiple analysis, valuation read-throughs, implied prices, comps dashboards, Excel or Sheets comps, refreshable peer tables, model updates, and comps workbook QA. Do not use for DCF-only, credit-security, or generic market commentary requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Product Design is explicitly invoked, or when the user's main goal is to explore a design, research UX, audit or critique a flow, faithfully clone a visual source, check a built design, or share a prototype. Do not use Product Design for ordinary implementation unless the user explicitly asks for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks about Mixpanel product analytics, event data, funnel analysis, retention curves, cohort analysis, segmentation queries, user behavior, conversion rates, churn, DAU/MAU, ARPU, revenue metrics, feature adoption, A/B test results, user paths, flow analysis, or any request to query, explore, visualize, or analyze Mixpanel data using Python. Also use when the user asks to read, write, or manage Mixpanel "business context" — the markdown documentation that grounds AI assistants in an organization's structure and goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build source-backed dashboards for monitoring performance, exploring drivers, or acting on product and business metrics. Use when the task needs a dashboard, scorecard, or monitoring view with clear metrics, filters, source definitions, and QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, edit, or validate reproducible SQL or Python notebooks. Use for notebooks, SQL/Python scratchpads, reproducible exploration, audit trails, or runnable companions where the analysis should be reviewable or rerunnable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess an immutable patch artifact's program impact, regression risk, and auto-merge eligibility. Use for generated patch files, provider pull-request diffs, or commit ranges when reviewers need evidence about affected runtime paths, contracts, tests, and recoverability. This skill is read-only and does not generate, edit, apply, push, or merge the patch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes web performance using Chrome DevTools MCP. Measures Core Web Vitals (FCP, LCP, TBT, CLS, Speed Index), identifies render-blocking resources, network dependency chains, layout shifts, caching issues, and accessibility gaps. Use when asked to audit, profile, debug, or optimize page load performance, Lighthouse scores, or site speed. Biases towards retrieval from current documentation over pre-trained knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test data visualizations and dashboards. Use when the user needs chart or diagram test strategy, screenshot or image diff testing, visual regression, mocked or synthetic chart data, component or unit tests, E2E dashboard QA, interactive UML-like diagram verification, scroll-driven story verification, export verification, or guidance on avoiding brittle over-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vulnerability notes, disclosure reports, PoCs, source code, or Codex Security findings into self-contained, sceptically validated, natural-sounding vulnerability reports. Use for one vulnerability or a disclosure campaign; a Codex Security scan is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix failing CircleCI builds quickly and safely. Use when users ask to investigate failed CircleCI jobs, triage flaky pipelines, identify root causes from logs, and implement minimal fixes in configuration, test setup, or build-related code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a deep, exhaustive, multi-pass, or variance-reducing repository-wide or scoped-path Codex Security scan. Run repeated complete independent Standard scans with the Codex Security deep-scan tool, which aggregates their validated findings and prepares the canonical artifacts; then complete the same scan once. Do not use for PRs, commits, branch diffs, or working-tree diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。