Map curriculum connections across multiple subjects for a real-world problem or authentic context. Use when planning cross-curricular projects or connecting content to real issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redesign a blocked topic sequence into an interleaved plan with mixed practice across related topics. Use when planning units, homework schedules, or revision programmes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authors or reviews Know/Understand/Do charts for competency-based learning targets across developmental bands. Handles seven input types from raw curriculum documents to existing LT sets. Routes to upstream skills when stronger inputs are available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify curriculum content into Know, Understand, and Do categories to align teaching and assessment approaches. Use when planning units, writing objectives, or selecting assessment methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse the language demands of a classroom task to identify barriers for EAL and multilingual learners. Use when adapting tasks, planning support, or assessing linguistic accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a lesson opening that activates prior knowledge and connects previous learning to today's content. Use when planning lesson starters, retrieval openers, or advance organisers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a five-level rubric with coherent logic for a learning target within a developmental band. Use for Manning methodology programmes where Competent = success. For general curriculum rubrics, use criterion-referenced-rubric-generator instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a fact-checking protocol for AI-generated text, extending SIFT with AI-specific adaptations for hallucination detection. Use when students need to verify AI claims and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate argument structure scaffolds using Toulmin, PEEL, or CER frameworks for a specific claim or question. Use when teaching argumentative or analytical writing across any subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A harness that makes Opus (or any Claude model) behave like Fable — it enforces seeing a task through to the end, with evidence and verification, as procedure. Use when starting a multi-step task (2+ sequential stories), long autonomous work, debugging or root-cause investigation, building render/executable artifacts (HTML, SVG, games, charts), or when the user says "fablize", "see it through", "verify as you go", "split into goals".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate tiered sentence frames for academic tasks that scaffold language production across proficiency levels. Use when EAL students need structured language support for classroom discourse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map control, influence, and concern after systems analysis. Use when students need wise agency without being made responsible for everything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate scaffolds that gradually increase student choice, voice, and ownership within a learning task. Use when students depend heavily on teacher direction and need to develop autonomy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After any AI-generated explanation, require the learner to identify one place it could be wrong, one thing to check, and one source to consult. Builds epistemic vigilance — treats AI output as a claim to evaluate, not truth to absorb.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map which elements of an assignment benefit from AI assistance vs. which AI use undermines. Use when redesigning tasks for AI-age classrooms or setting defensible AI use policies for specific assignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a structured protocol for auditing AI-generated text against Ennis's six CT standards. Use when students need to critically evaluate AI output in any subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a multi-round questioning sequence for interrogating AI chatbot answers, tracking how responses shift and distinguishing genuine updates from sycophantic capitulation. Use when teaching students to probe AI critically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design the deeper patterns, structures, artefacts, and mental models needed to grow a desired event. Use when a class imagines a better future.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a proposed assessment for construct validity, reliability, and alignment to learning objectives. Use when reviewing or quality-assuring assessments before deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a moment of awe or wonder that hooks curiosity and deepens emotional engagement with content. Use when opening units, introducing surprising material, or reigniting student interest.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a unit using backwards design from desired outcomes through assessment evidence to learning activities. Use when starting a new unit or redesigning an existing one from standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redesign a learning space using biophilic design principles to improve focus, calm, and wellbeing. Use when classroom environment contributes to restlessness, poor attention, or stress.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a teacher-drafted central historical question for its capacity to drive genuine historical inquiry. Use when assessing whether a question will generate real evidence-weighing or produce shallow responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。