Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
@proffesor-for-testing
Knowledge is power. Keep learning. Keep sharing.
205 スキル1 リポジトリ 515
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate Agentic QE projects from v2 to v3 with zero data loss
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantum-resistant, self-learning version control for AI agents with ReasoningBank intelligence and multi-agent coordination
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive WCAG accessibility auditing with multi-tool testing (axe-core + pa11y + Lighthouse), TRUE PARALLEL execution with Promise.allSettled, graceful degradation, retry with backoff, context-aware remediation, learning integration, and video accessibility. Uses 3-tier browser cascade: Vibium → agent-browser → Playwright+Stealth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QCSD Production Telemetry phase swarm for post-release production health assessment using DORA metrics, root cause analysis, defect prediction, and cross-phase feedback loops. Consumes CI/CD outputs (RELEASE/REMEDIATE/BLOCK decisions, release readiness metrics) and produces feedback signals to Ideation and Refinement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QCSD Refinement phase swarm for Sprint Refinement sessions using SFDIPOT product factors, BDD scenario generation, and requirements validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QCSD Ideation phase swarm for Quality Criteria sessions using HTSM v6.3, Risk Storming, and Testability analysis before development begins. Uses 5-tier browser cascade: Vibium → agent-browser → Playwright+Stealth → WebFetch → WebSearch-fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACTS principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, and run durable tests for Agentic QE code changes. Use when adding tests, reproducing a defect, filling a coverage gap, selecting affected Vitest suites, checking CLI/MCP parity, or verifying a fix in this repository. Do not use for a read-only quality review with no requested edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QCSD Verification phase swarm for CI/CD pipeline quality gates using regression analysis, flaky test detection, quality gate enforcement, and deployment readiness assessment. Consumes Development outputs (SHIP/CONDITIONAL/HOLD decisions, quality metrics) and produces signals for Production monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced test reporting, quality dashboards, predictive analytics, trend analysis, and executive reporting for QE metrics. Use when communicating quality status, tracking trends, or making data-driven decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add optional Ruflo development-time orchestration to an Agentic QE workflow. Use when a task benefits from coordinated swarms, persistent cross-session memory, routing, or Ruflo hooks. Do not use for a one-shot edit, and never add Ruflo to shipped AQE runtime dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
15-agent hierarchical mesh coordination for v3 implementation. Orchestrates parallel execution across security, core, and integration domains following 10 ADRs with 14-week timeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct evidence-first technical research for Agentic QE, Ruflo, related ruvnet projects, or external tools. Use when Codex must investigate a repository, compare current upstream changes, trace dependencies and history, distinguish verified facts from inference, or synthesize findings into actionable engineering recommendations. Do not use for a simple known-answer lookup or an implementation-only task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Warehouse Management System testing patterns for inventory operations, pick/pack/ship workflows, wave management, EDI X12/EDIFACT compliance, RF/barcode scanning, and WMS-ERP integration. Use when testing WMS platforms (Blue Yonder, Manhattan, SAP EWM).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-browser, cross-platform, and cross-device compatibility testing ensuring consistent experience across environments. Use when validating browser support, testing responsive design, or ensuring platform compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create risk-based quality and test plans for Agentic QE changes. Use when scoping a feature, translating requirements into verification work, selecting QE specialties, assessing testability, or deciding which `.claude/agents/v3/qe-*.md` capabilities should inform a task. Do not use merely to execute an already-defined test command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Agentic QE changes and issue an evidence-backed quality verdict. Use for code review, regression-risk assessment, release readiness, quality-gate evaluation, security/performance/testability review, or checking whether a change has sufficient verification. Do not use when the user primarily asks to implement a feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QCSD Development phase swarm for in-sprint code quality assurance using TDD adherence, code complexity analysis, coverage gap detection, and defect prediction. Consumes Refinement outputs (BDD scenarios, SFDIPOT priorities) and produces signals for Verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。