Steven Denney

End-stage QA for a finished figure and table set (callouts, numbering, cross-references, text-to-exhibit consistency, captions and notes, accessibility, SI and replication linkage). Use when preparing a submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and format publication-quality figures. Use for chart choice, color, scales, legends, captions, accessibility, and reproducible figure workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-session closure. Records what changed into the project's own handoff and log files, separating verified from attempted work, and reports what is uncommitted. Use when wrapping up a session. Twin of sitrep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start-of-session report on where a repository stands. Reads the project's own handoff and log files, checks live git state, and reports objective, verified baseline, open tasks, blockers, and next actions. Use when resuming work. Twin of finished.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs survey instruments: question wording, scales and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting, attention and speeding rules, and sensitive questions. Use when writing or revising survey questions, choosing scales, ordering blocks, or planning a pilot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a manuscript's citations for fabricated sources, DOIs that resolve to the wrong work, in-text and reference-list mismatches, style, and claim support, verified against Crossref and OpenAlex. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fact-check manuscript claims against their cited sources in a per-source Markdown knowledge base. Use to audit claim support, overclaiming, direction, scope, and misattribution after source intake is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer decks (storyboarding, slide prose, frame budgets, layout, XeLaTeX and Korean fonts, color, figures, Overleaf hygiene, build QA). Use to write, edit, review, or build a Beamer deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and format publication-quality tables. Use for column order, row grouping, notes, statistical precision, accessibility, and reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult an independent, read-only GPT-6 Astra advisor before committing to a substantive interpretation, approach, or final result. Not for routine work, implementation, or file edits. Uses gpt-6-astra at an effort matched to the question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation. Use when checking whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, or answering referee comments on one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opens a talk, module, paper, chapter, or referee report as a multi-session deliverable. Interviews the author, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, HANDOFF.md, the planning/ wiki, inbox/, and checks/. Use for deadline-driven work spanning sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates 3-5 conceptually distinct approaches (Novel, Surprising, Diverse, Conventional) and holds for selection before implementing. Use before committing to an approach when a task has more than one non-obvious solution; --codex delegates the brainstorm to a fresh subagent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a methods section against a 45-item checklist drawn from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT. Use before submission or archiving, or to document a pre-analysis-plan deviation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one consequential, contestable decision through a deliberative committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus, chaired by fable (default), astra, opus, or sol. Not for factual lookups, brainstorming, routine implementation, independent-coder reliability, or final professional judgment. Use when several options are defensible and the two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank under a predeclared rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerics, references, writing, figures, methods, preregistration, and replication readiness. Add --codex for a cross-model pass in which Codex and Claude review independently and verify each other's findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。