Results for “rspec”

Solves UI lock-in. Reverse engineers your existing UI, strips all layout/token decisions, preserves every hook, handler, and API call untouched, then rebuilds the UI from scratch with a fresh design system. Use /ui-restructure to fully redesign, --style apple|linear|minimal|dashboard for named styles, --mode layout|theme|grid for partial rebuilds, --god-mode to redesign from the user's perspective using 100-user mindset simulation and 6 UX principles, --keep-tokens to preserve your token system, --prompt for custom redesigns. Applies mandatory world-class polish: spring motion, 5-state micro-interactions, 8pt spacing grid, WCAG accessibility. Supports Next.js, React, Vue 3, Tailwind, CSS Modules, styled-components, shadcn.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Multi-agent brainstorming: async opinion collision with expert personas. Mixed Codex/Claude Code engine. Use when multiple AI agents need to collaboratively discuss, debate, and converge on solutions through structured dialog. Triggers: brainstorm, multi-perspective discussion, opinion collision, expert debate, war room, collective intelligence, 头脑风暴, 多视角讨论, 集思广益.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Review resumes, cover letters, application packages, and evidence maps from an HR perspective. Use when the user asks for 자기소개서 리뷰, 자소서 검토, HR 검토, 제출 전 점검, unsupported-claim detection, company-name residue checks, or risk-focused revision advice before applying.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Routes general Convex requests to the right project skill. Use when the user asks which Convex skill to use or gives an underspecified Convex app task.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when: analysing a project's architecture, structure, and infrastructure health from the System perspective.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Debate multi-agente: 2-4 perspectivas (PM, Arquiteto, QA, Security) debatem decisao tecnica. Output: decisao + rationale + dissenting opinions → ADR. Inspirado no Party Mode do BMAD-METHOD.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with evidence-linked judgments and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents, enabling natural multi-agent conversations where each agent is a real subagent with independent thinking. Use when user requests party mode, wants multiple agent perspectives, group discussion, roundtable, or multi-agent conversation about their project.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Rewrite a rough request into a sharp, structured prompt before acting on it. Use when the user says "reprompt this", "reprompt", "improve this prompt", "make this prompt better", "structure this request", or hands you a vague/underspecified ask you should sharpen first. Complements the automatic per-turn sharpener (the UserPromptSubmit hook) for explicit, heavier rewrites. Personalizes from ~/.stellar-build/profile.md when present.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Three.js (three, WebGL / WebGPU 3D グラフィクス) r186 リファレンス。 Scene, Group, PerspectiveCamera, OrthographicCamera, WebGLRenderer, WebGPURenderer, RenderPipeline、 BufferGeometry, BufferAttribute, StorageBufferAttribute, Mesh, InstancedMesh, SkinnedMesh、 MeshStandardMaterial, MeshPhysicalMaterial, ShaderMaterial, node-materials (TSL)、 DirectionalLight, SpotLight, PointLight, AmbientLight, PMREMGenerator、 GLTFLoader, FBXLoader, DRACOLoader, TextureLoader、 AnimationMixer, AnimationClip, AnimationAction, KeyframeTrack, Timer、 AudioListener, PositionalAudio、 Vector3, Matrix4, Quaternion, Euler, Color, Box3, Raycaster、 OrbitControls, TransformControls, WebXRManager。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Shakes your mental models with critical rigor, challenges assumptions, exposes blind spots, and provides multi-perspective insights as a strict thinking mentor. Deliberately breaks format conventions to stimulate genuine cognitive discomfort. Use when you want to stress-test an idea, shake your mental model, ask to challenge my assumptions, find blind spots, deepen my thinking, or request critical review with phrases like yusaburi or what do you think of this plan.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Routes general Convex requests to the right project skill. Use when the user asks which Convex skill to use or gives an underspecified Convex app task.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Review a GitHub pull request from multiple perspectives in parallel, output only findings, then let the user pick which to fix in the same session. Use when the user asks to review a PR by number, mentions "PRレビュー" / "PR review" with a number, or invokes `/pr-review <number>`. Fans out subagents for absolute-rules, stop-slop, security, architecture, code-quality, testing, and ai-antipattern.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Spatial depth design with isometric views, vanishing points, and layered elements that guide attention through 3D-like realism.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Route communication modes, learning workflows, retrospectives, output discipline, and perspective shifts to focused productivity skills.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Multi-agent exploration and task delegation for complex areas of interest. Use when you need to deeply explore a codebase area, gather information from multiple perspectives, or delegate parallel research tasks for comprehensive analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.