Results for “proposal”

4 business growth agent skills and plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Customer success (health scoring, churn), sales engineer (RFP), revenue operations (pipeline, GTM), contract & proposal writer. Python tools (stdlib-only).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Zero-knowledge proofs and privacy patterns on Stellar. Covers Groth16 verification in smart contracts via BLS12-381 host functions (CAP-0059, available), the BN254 + Poseidon proposals (CAP-0074/0075, status-sensitive), and concrete toolchain walkthroughs for Circom (on-chain verifiable today), Noir, and RISC Zero (attestation pattern until BN254 lands). Use when building privacy-preserving applications, ZK-verifier contracts, or wiring a proving toolchain to Stellar.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

クライアントの与件情報と打ち合わせメモから、意思決定に直結する調査プロジェクト提案書（スライド骨子/Markdown）を一発で作成するスキル。「提案書を作成して」「提案書を作って」「プロポーザルを作成して」などの依頼、または与件ファイル（例：与件.md）を指定して提案書作成を依頼された場合に使用する。単なる章立てではなく、調査の観点・仮説・参入障壁や供給構造・会議転用可能なアウトプットまで落として提案する。インプットや指示からデプスインタビューが必要と推測できる場合のみ、インタビュー前提の設計を含める。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Reply to an applicant for an employer's Otameshi Tenshoku listing: match the application against the listed requirements item by item on what the applicant actually stated, list the questions still open, and draft an invitation, a request for clarification, a hold notice or a decline that sticks to the listed conditions, keeps other applicants and internal notes out, and presents any new work or dates as a proposal rather than an agreed term. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner has applications to answer, wants to know what to ask before inviting, or has to decline; do not use to judge an applicant's aptitude or predict hiring outcomes, to screen on personal attributes unrelated to the work, to design the work (trial-work-design) or the listing (trial-listing-draft), or to send the message or update applicant records on the user's behalf.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

docs (editable docs people share and comment on; the default for any document, named as a doc or not: a document, report, proposal, resume, cover letter, letter, contract, policy, form, template, worksheet, essay, handbook, guide, how-to, cheat sheet, SOP or other writing to keep, share, collaborate on, send, submit, print or sign; a doc exports to Word, PDF, Markdown or Google Docs, so needing a file to send, attach, upload, submit or print is no reason to pick Word, and a file nobody asked for is a doc, not Word; a plan, comparison, summary or notes asked in chat stays in chat; a pasted claude.ai artifact link may be a doc: check with docs tools first; Word or another file format named, tracked changes wanted, or a .docx to change or use as a template → that format's skill): making one → if no docs-connector instructions are in context, call its `guide` (topic.instructions) first; then create the doc (headings only, no body) before any search, file read or plan, even with files attached.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Analyze a completed phase diff for high-confidence behavior-preserving simplifications and apply only explicitly approved proposals. Use after execution and before review to reduce duplication, dead code, needless complexity, or avoidable inefficiency.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. For competitor comparison pages and battle cards, see competitor-alternatives. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or decide whether to expand or reduce the plan.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

任務卡的必要調整。Use when ATM task cards contain proposal-style notes or dated additive acceptance sections such as 識別/行為/狀態機提案、不重啟驗收、ATM 演進規劃書 v2、連鎖影響、治理補丁, and those notes must be re-analyzed into the formal task-card sections.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Resolve the current user prompt into an atm.taskIntent.v1 proposal before next-action routing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Scan evidence reports and draft governed upgrade proposals.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Design a self-improvement loop for a shipped product's AI agents — production traces feed evals, evals feed improvement proposals (prompts, playbooks, retrieval configs), and a human approval gate promotes changes with rollback. Technique-agnostic: chooses per project between ACE-style evolving playbooks, GEPA/MIPROv2 offline optimization, or simple eval-driven iteration via references/techniques.md. Load when the user asks to make my product's agents self-improving, learn from production traces, add a learning loop, evolve prompts or playbooks safely, promote agent improvements, or GEPA-style optimization. NOT harness-evolution (that improves the coding agent), NOT experimentation (product A/B tests), NOT agent-run-retro (dev-phase manual retros — this skill is the production-scale continuation).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "investigate a bug", "debug an issue", "figure out why something is happening", "find the root cause", "troubleshoot", "強い推論で調査", "仮説を立てて検証", "原因を特定", "バグの原因調査", "なぜ動かないか調べて", "問題を切り分け", "原因不明", "デバッグ", or mentions systematic hypothesis-driven debugging. NOTE: Use this for investigating UNKNOWN causes, not for validating design proposals (use devils-advocate for that).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "synthesize two competing solutions without averaging", "resolve a design/value disagreement by lifting to a higher frame", "止揚 / アウフヘーベン", "矛盾を止揚", "独立案を統合", "平均化せず統合", "contradiction lift", "sublate competing designs", or has two good-but-divergent answers to the same question and wants a higher-order resolution (a selection mechanism) or an honest aporia — not a compromise. NOTE: Use this when two independent solutions diverge and you want to PRESERVE both truth-moments while lifting to a higher frame. Use devils-advocate to stress-test ONE proposal with an assigned opponent, strong-inference to find an unknown cause, and dialectic-loop to validate a claim against a real corpus.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

This skill should be used when the user wants to "test a claim against data", "validate an empirical hypothesis", "refine a model/theory with evidence", "characterize a pattern and verify it", "演繹と帰納で検証", "仮説をデータで検証して更新", "実例と反例で確かめる", "弁証法ループ", "主張を現物で裏取り", "傾向分析を検証して精緻化", or mentions iteratively updating a hypothesis by deriving predictions and testing them against a real corpus. NOTE: Use this for VALIDATING/REFINING an empirical claim or model against real data through a derive→test→update loop. Use strong-inference for debugging an UNKNOWN cause, and devils-advocate for adversarially stress-testing a DESIGN proposal.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Analyze an idea, proposal, change, claim, or decision from facts through problem, value, mechanism, consequences, evidence, alternatives, and action. Use when the user asks what something is for, why it matters, whether it is worth doing, what impact it has, or how to decide. Do not use for simple factual lookup or straightforward execution.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when designing a Spark feature or writing or materially revising a design proposal that needs repository-first research, user input on unresolved key choices, and an owner-aligned implementation plan before code changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Expert sales execution covering pipeline management, discovery, demos, negotiation, and deal closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

World-class autonomous sales and revenue skill system. Use ANY time the user asks to sell, pitch, prospect, close, negotiate, launch, monetize, build funnels, write outreach, craft proposals, develop pricing, design offers, write sales copy, create email sequences, plan campaigns, position products, handle objections, create playbooks, build pipeline, forecast revenue, develop GTM strategy, optimize conversions, write ad copy, create sales decks, score leads, nurture prospects, upsell, cross-sell, retain customers, write case studies, price products, structure enterprise deals, create battle cards, script discovery calls, build affiliate programs, plan product launches, create webinar funnels, design pricing pages, A/B test offers, analyze unit economics, calculate LTV/CAC, or ANY other sales, revenue, monetization, go-to-market, or commercial growth task. If it involves selling, revenue, deals, pipeline, or commercial strategy — USE THIS SKILL. Trigger aggressively.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.