Results for “judgment”

Use when loading, listing, composing, or validating graded evaluation rubrics — PASS/WARN/FAIL grading with weighted criteria and balanced PASS/FAIL anchor examples. Triggers on /mk:rubric, "load rubric", "compose rubric preset", "validate rubric", or evaluator-style code review that needs anchor-grounded judgments.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Guide a non-stigmatising pediatric obesity consultation using the 5As framework (Ask, Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist) and 4Ms assessment (Metabolic, Mechanical, Mental Health, Social Milieu), based on the CMAJ 2025 guideline. Trigger when a clinician asks how to approach a weight conversation with a child or family, how to use the 5As for obesity, how to assess a child with obesity, or how to conduct a non-judgmental obesity visit.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when classifying data, setting retention, judging cross-border transfer, or shaping DSR workflow. Triggers on 'how long do we keep this', 'can this data go to the US'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Build AI-powered software with TypeSafe: small units of AI intelligence you can use like programming primitives. Its System One models, including Jev, turn natural language and application state into typed judgments and probabilities that code can combine. Use when a feature needs programmable common sense, when brainstorming what AI could make possible in an app, or when an LLM prompt-and-parse step could become a structured decision. Applications include routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive experiences; these are starting points, not the limits. Read live docs and cookbooks to find useful patterns and discover new combinations.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Write what the work found into the project's knowledge record, so the next session inherits it instead of re-deriving it. Use the moment something worth keeping exists: a fact taken from a source, a rule worked out, a decision or conclusion, a measurement, a correction to a recorded value, or a question left open - and check for unrecorded findings before implementation, handoff (including a PR), or finishing work. Record within the user's write authorization. The first write creates GROUNDING.yaml. Covers one-report update, add, set, review, same and distinct, judgments with a falsifier, and background capture.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

[Code Quality] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for rationale evaluation or critical judgment of a decision, claim or statement: necessity, options, trade-offs. --validate-findings checks findings; --fix-loop fixes. Diffs: changes-review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Find, build, evaluate, and improve systems using decision models. Use for bounded classification, routing, ranking, Choice/Score/Noul, decision-model composition, evaluation harnesses, prompt/program hill climbing, and Software 3.0 workflows across software, business, organizations, and life. Separate models, code, and human judgment. TypeSafe Jev is the default hosted exemplar. Not for straightforward arithmetic, prose rewriting, or provider setup alone.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Clarify ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions before implementation; stop before implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when drafting, reviewing, or revising Xiaohongshu/Douyin/social-platform Chinese text so it has real internet-native judgment instead of README tone, technical-briefing tone, or mechanical meme-word stuffing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when splitting content work between a raw drafting model/window, an editor-in-chief, and the user's final taste review. It keeps prompts loose enough for judgment while preserving facts, account boundaries, and publish gates.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use this skill when someone wants to contribute, submit or publish a GRC skill to the grcskills library (github.com/better-isms/grcskills, grcskills.com), or update a skill or author profile they already published there. Interviews the contributor for practitioner judgment, drafts the files in the library format, runs the validator and opens one pull request.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Process the batch of incoming Bridge Classroom feedback. Pull open `classroom-feedback` issues from the PBS repo, cluster them by defect class, verify each against the actual board, and fix at the right altitude — patch a single board, or (when a class recurs) build a gate, sweep the whole corpus, and regenerate/drop collectively. Engine bugs route to the Classroom repo; bridge-judgment calls go to Rick. Nothing leaves the machine without David's OK. Invoke as `/issue` (optionally with an issue number or scenario to restrict the run).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

設計系スキルの入口。「AIっぽい」「テンプレート感」「もっと洗練させたい」「管理画面のレビュー」など画面設計の相談を受けたら、業務構造の診断(ux-design §0-1〜§13-1)と見た目の素材(jp-web-design)のどれをいつ読むかをここで決める。UIの新規設計・リニューアル・レビューの着手時に必ず最初に開く。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Validate logical consistency of decisions and claims through context forking. Use proactively when judgment validity is unclear, but prefer direct tools (Read, Bash) for simple verifications like file contents or test results.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run a support investigation as a suggest-and-interpret loop, never executing anything yourself — orient to the product's support pack and follow the signal with judgment. Use when someone asks for help triaging, investigating, or resolving an operational or support issue on a deployment. Not for feature-development cards (see investigate-and-fix and implement-this).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Delegate real-world tasks to human workers via the OpenHumancy API. Use when the user needs physical actions (field verification, photography, deliveries, mystery shopping), human judgment, or any task that requires a person. Manages the full lifecycle — worker search, task creation, chat, payments on the TON blockchain.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Help other designers develop judgment without imposing your style. Use when mentoring designers, running design education, or building team-wide quality standards.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Experimental workflow for summarizing work that still needs human judgment across configured pull requests, issues, feedback, errors, and delivery signals. Use for a human decision queue or bounded review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when the user wants all 16 personality types (16-minds plugin) to vote on a proposal — yes/no/abstain — to see stakeholder distribution, detect hidden objections, or simulate organizational consensus. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「全人格で投票」「16人格に賛否を聞いて」「ステークホルダーシミュ」「これ通せそう？」, English equivalents like "vote with all 16 minds" / "stakeholder simulation", or `--vote` flag on 16-minds commands. Different from /minds (which is for opinion divergence) — this is for binary judgment aggregation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Use when the user provides multiple options and wants a specific 16-minds (MBTI) personality to make the decision in that personality's judgment style. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「ENTJで決めて」「INFPならどっち選ぶ」「INTJとして判断して」, English equivalents like "decide as ESTJ" / "which would ENFP pick", or 16-minds commands with a `--decide` flag. Requires both a personality and 2+ options to be present or extractable from the request.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.