Use when the user asks to "audit our launch plan", "are we ready to launch", or evaluate launch execution/outcomes; runs one typed RAMP preflight, execution, or outcome profile without mixing time horizons. Not for recording launch state — use launch-registry; not for running launch day — use launch-day-conductor. 发布就绪审计/RAMP分阶段评估/发布前放行
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
unempyd/revenueos☆ 7Updated Sep 14, 2026
Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
huang-sh/DeepScience☆ 4Updated Jul 15, 2026
Drug and chemical toxicity assessment via adverse outcome pathways (AOPs), real-world FAERS adverse event signals, FDA labels, and toxicogenomic associations. Triangulates molecular initiating event to cellular outcome to organ-level toxicity to clinical adverse event. Use for hepatotoxicity/cardiotoxicity/nephrotoxicity prediction and toxicology reports.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
huang-sh/DeepScience☆ 4Updated Jul 15, 2026
Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
peacezha/TRACE☆ 3Updated Oct 20, 2026
Select alternative execution paths when a plan step fails — branch on outcomes instead of blind retry. Load when a structured plan step fails, an unexpected observation arrives, or the user asks what to try next after an error. Also triggers on "try another approach", "route around this failure", "replan on failure", "if X fails try Y", or outcome-based branching during multi-step work. Pairs with structured-planning and debug-and-fix. Does not replace root-cause debugging — adds plan-level path selection.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 3Updated Aug 8, 2026
Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 3Updated Oct 11, 2026
Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 3Updated Oct 19, 2026
Design or audit an agent identity, credential, session, continuity, and reputation plan. Use when attributed outcomes must survive key rotation, restart, recovery, or review; when choosing Elo, TrueSkill, a contextual bandit, or an LLM judge; and when making Sybil, newcomer, calibration, collusion, and evidence limits explicit. Produces a supplied-plan consistency audit, never proof of observed delivery, cryptographic identity, or live enforcement. NOT for proving personhood, global Sybil resistance, or an unobserved delivery.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 3Updated Oct 19, 2026
Coordinate repairs across multiple OpenClaw issues or pull requests, which propose code changes. Assign owners, prove defects, verify fixes, and track outcomes through merging or closing resolved items within the authorized scope.
- Coordinating repairs for multiple issues and pull requests
- Completing and verifying an existing repair pull request
- Closing issues already proven fixed on main
openclaw/openclaw☆ 392.9KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Prepare REA changelogs and GitHub release notes from a fixed Git revision. Turn verified changes into clear user outcomes, preserve accurate contributor credit, and keep the release text aligned with Release Please, the automated release workflow.
- Drafting release notes from Git history
- Rewriting changes around their impact on users
- Verifying contributor credit and issue links
morluto/rea☆ 346KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.
- Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
- Investigating loops through the same tool calls
- Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC☆ 284.7KUpdated Oct 5, 2026
Evaluate prediction markets as information sources for products, agents, dashboards, and business decisions. Record probabilities implied by market prices with sources and timestamps, assess signal quality, and compare other evidence to recommend suitable uses and explain limitations.
- Evaluating prediction-market data for a product
- Comparing market probabilities with internal dashboard metrics
- Assessing probability signals for agent memory or alerts
affaan-m/ECC☆ 284.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Write and review C# and .NET tests using xUnit examples. Covers unit tests, mocks that replace dependencies, API and database integration tests, reusable test data, and project organization to check behavior and outcomes.
- Adding tests for C# services
- Testing ASP.NET Core APIs
- Checking database persistence
affaan-m/ECC☆ 284.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Organize engineering work carried out by AI agents with clear completion criteria, small verifiable tasks, and evaluations before and after implementation. Match model choice to task complexity and track tokens, retries, time, and outcomes to manage cost.
- Planning development work for AI agents
- Splitting a large change into independently verifiable tasks
- Comparing evaluations before and after implementation
affaan-m/ECC☆ 284.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Independently reviews deliverables handed over through Kanban, checks them against acceptance criteria and test evidence, and records an approval, actionable change request, or escalation when a human decision or external prerequisite is needed.
- Reviewing deliverables against acceptance criteria
- Rechecking corrections after a change request
- Returning reproducible defects to the implementer
NousResearch/hermes-agent☆ 255.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Turn a topic or script into a finished MP4 with MoneyPrinterTurbo. The skill handles installation, configuration, generation, and delivery, with support for voice-over, subtitles, background music, and recovery from fixable generation errors.
- Create a short social media video from a topic
- Turn an educational script into a narrated video
- Produce a marketing video using stock footage
harry0703/MoneyPrinterTurbo☆ 133.4KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Build a narrowly scoped feature or integration using existing repository structures. Define observable acceptance criteria and non-goals, complete the working path across relevant layers, and stop when focused checks confirm the requested outcome.
- Building a feature within a clear scope
- Adding integrations using existing structures
- Defining acceptance criteria and non-goals
JuliusBrussee/caveman☆ 113.8KUpdated Oct 19, 2026
Verify that existing work meets its acceptance conditions using the smallest sufficient set of checks. Reuse results that still match the repository state, report outcomes precisely, and stop once the evidence is complete without adding unrelated work.
- Checking completed work against acceptance conditions
- Running focused checks for specific requirements
- Reusing verification results that remain current
JuliusBrussee/caveman☆ 113.8KUpdated Oct 19, 2026
Clarify an unclear request through one question at a time, with the agent sharing its best guess for each answer. Produce a user-confirmed statement covering the desired outcome, audience, timing, success criteria, constraints, and exclusions.
- Clarifying the purpose behind a vague request
- Identifying intended users and success criteria
- Choosing priorities when values conflict
addyosmani/agent-skills☆ 108.9KUpdated Oct 14, 2026
Read email linked to assigned Paperclip tasks, send new messages or replies through an assigned AgentMail inbox, and check delivery outcomes. Follow task permissions and preserve retry identifiers to avoid duplicate sends.
- Reading email context attached to an assigned task
- Sending a new email from an assigned inbox
- Replying to a specific message in a conversation
paperclipai/paperclip☆ 105.1KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Review another agent’s recent work records to identify recurring problems and propose small changes to instructions, skills, or tool descriptions. Produce evidence-backed drafts and reviewable diffs, checking that proposed rules would preserve successful outcomes from past tasks.
- Reviewing recurring mistakes in another agent’s work
- Drafting targeted improvements to agent instructions
- Turning a recurring issue into a reusable skill
paperclipai/paperclip☆ 105.1KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Create acceptance criteria and a manual validation plan for feature changes. Cover successful flows, unusual inputs, failures, and performance limits, with observable outcomes and clear evidence requirements so reviewers can decide whether each criterion passes.
- Preparing a feature change for QA
- Reviewing a PR that changes user-visible behavior
- Planning regression checks after an incident
paperclipai/paperclip☆ 105.1KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Turn product requirements, roadmaps, architecture reviews, and retrospectives into HTML slides for decision-making. Choose one of eight visual themes to create a consistent, horizontally navigable deck, using source evidence and real numbers to support review.
- Building a business case for a proposed feature
- Preparing a roadmap for stakeholder review
- Presenting architecture choices for a decision
nexu-io/open-design☆ 102.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Create an HTML year-end self-review deck for a product manager, organizing responsibilities, results, lessons, and requests around supporting evidence. The template uses rounded cards and pastel colors to present the case to managers or review committees.
- Preparing a product manager's year-end self-review
- Presenting evidence of achievements to a review committee
- Organizing lessons learned and career requests for a manager
nexu-io/open-design☆ 102.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026