Skip to content
cccskills

Results for “pth”

613 skills · sorted by relevance

Estimates the minimum biological replicates (or cells/events) for a target power at a target FDR in genomics experiments using ssizeRNA, PROPER, powsimR for scRNA-seq, and pilot-data dispersion estimation from DESeq2/edgeR. Covers the biological-versus-technical replication distinction (technical replicates do not add degrees of freedom for biological inference), replicate-number-versus-sequencing-depth budgeting, scRNA-seq sample-versus-cell allocation under a pseudobulk model, and the critique that "n=3" is a publication convention rather than a power calculation. Use when budgeting a sequencing experiment, writing the sample-size justification in a grant, estimating replicates from pilot data, allocating a fixed budget between samples and depth, or planning scRNA-seq cohort size. For clinical-trial sample size see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the power-given-n direction see experimental-design/power-analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

huang-sh/DeepScience4Updated Jul 15, 2026

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

huang-sh/DeepScience4Updated Jul 15, 2026

Orchestrates an end-to-end immune-repertoire pipeline from FASTQ to clonotypes, diversity, overlap, somatic hypermutation and lineages, routing on two forks. Use when deciding bulk vs single-cell (bulk amplicon/RNA-seq -> MiXCR analyze preset -> VDJtools/immunarch depth-normalized diversity and overlap -> figures; 10x paired VDJ -> MiXCR 10x preset or Cell Ranger -> scirpy gene-expression integration, chain QC, clonotype clusters); and TCR vs BCR (TCR -> exact CDR3-nt+V/J clonotypes, VDJtools diversity is fine; BCR -> somatic hypermutation makes exact clonotypes wrong -> Immcantation distToNearest/findThreshold clonal clustering, germline reconstruction, SHM, Dowser lineages); selecting the MiXCR 4.x preset by chemistry and activating its license; downsampling to equal depth before comparing diversity or overlap; and optionally annotating antigen specificity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

huang-sh/DeepScience4Updated Jul 15, 2026

End-to-end Hi-C analysis workflow from FASTQ to compartments, TADs, and loops, with the decision of WHICH features the sequencing depth can support. Covers pairtools read-pair processing and library QC, cooler matrices, ICE balancing and distance-decay expected, A/B compartments, TAD boundaries, loop calling, and the routing of HiChIP/PLAC-seq/Capture Hi-C to protein-directed loop callers. Use when processing Hi-C data end to end, deciding a resolution for a given depth, or choosing between bulk-Hi-C and protein-directed loop calling.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

huang-sh/DeepScience4Updated Jul 15, 2026

Spawns and attaches sensors on a running CARLA server — cameras (rgb/depth/semantic/instance/optical-flow/normals), lidar, radar, IMU, GNSS, collision/lane-invasion/obstacle — to the ego or any actor, with a mount transform and blueprint attributes (resolution, fov, sensor_tick, lidar range/points, …). Also sets up native ROS 2 publishing (--ros to enable_for_ros, --ros-name/--ros-frame-id topic and TF naming) and prints the topics the sensor will publish. Use when the user asks to "add a camera/lidar/sensor", "put a dashcam on the ego", "attach a depth camera", "mount a sensor", or "publish a sensor to ROS". Prints the sensor id; read its data with the read-sensor skill.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

carla-simulator/carla-agentic-tools4Updated Sep 12, 2026

Balances Hi-C contact matrices (ICE via cooler.balance_cooler, KR/SCALE/VC context), computes distance-decay expected with cooltools (expected_cis per-diagonal P(s), expected_trans scalar), builds observed/expected (O/E) matrices, and diagnoses polymer state from the P(s) log-derivative. Covers the within-matrix-vs-cross-sample distinction (balancing is NOT a normalizer), the equal-visibility assumption that CNV/aneuploidy violates (use raw counts for copy-number), cis-only balancing, mad_max/blacklist masking before balancing, multiplicative cooler weights vs divisive juicer weights, and the resolution-vs-depth budget. Use when balancing a .cool/.mcool, computing expected or P(s), making O/E matrices for compartments/loops, deciding ICE vs KR vs SCALE, choosing a resolution for a given depth, or troubleshooting NaN/all-NaN balanced matrices; route cross-sample comparison to hic-differential.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 20, 2026

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 20, 2026

Estimates the minimum biological replicates (or cells/events) for a target power at a target FDR in genomics experiments using ssizeRNA, PROPER, powsimR for scRNA-seq, and pilot-data dispersion estimation from DESeq2/edgeR. Covers the biological-versus-technical replication distinction (technical replicates do not add degrees of freedom for biological inference), replicate-number-versus-sequencing-depth budgeting, scRNA-seq sample-versus-cell allocation under a pseudobulk model, and the critique that "n=3" is a publication convention rather than a power calculation. Use when budgeting a sequencing experiment, writing the sample-size justification in a grant, estimating replicates from pilot data, allocating a fixed budget between samples and depth, or planning scRNA-seq cohort size. For clinical-trial sample size see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the power-given-n direction see experimental-design/power-analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 20, 2026

Detect somatic and germline copy number variants from targeted, exome, and whole-genome sequencing with CNVkit, a read-depth caller that combines on-target and off-target (antitarget) coverage. Covers panel-of-normals construction, flat-reference tumor-only calling, hybrid/amplicon/WGS modes, CBS vs HMM segmentation selection, purity-aware integer calling, and reconciliation against GATK and allele-specific callers. Use when calling CNVs from hybrid-capture panels or exomes, deciding whether CNVkit (depth-only) is the right tool versus an allele-specific caller, building a panel of normals, diagnosing flat-reference false positives, or interpreting log2 ratios into copy-number states.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 20, 2026

Generate alignment statistics using samtools flagstat, stats, depth, coverage, and mosdepth. Use when assessing alignment quality, calculating coverage, or generating QC reports.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 20, 2026

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/TRACE3Updated Oct 20, 2026

Balances Hi-C contact matrices (ICE via cooler.balance_cooler, KR/SCALE/VC context), computes distance-decay expected with cooltools (expected_cis per-diagonal P(s), expected_trans scalar), builds observed/expected (O/E) matrices, and diagnoses polymer state from the P(s) log-derivative. Covers the within-matrix-vs-cross-sample distinction (balancing is NOT a normalizer), the equal-visibility assumption that CNV/aneuploidy violates (use raw counts for copy-number), cis-only balancing, mad_max/blacklist masking before balancing, multiplicative cooler weights vs divisive juicer weights, and the resolution-vs-depth budget. Use when balancing a .cool/.mcool, computing expected or P(s), making O/E matrices for compartments/loops, deciding ICE vs KR vs SCALE, choosing a resolution for a given depth, or troubleshooting NaN/all-NaN balanced matrices; route cross-sample comparison to hic-differential.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/HPClaw3Updated Oct 11, 2026

Estimates the minimum biological replicates (or cells/events) for a target power at a target FDR in genomics experiments using ssizeRNA, PROPER, powsimR for scRNA-seq, and pilot-data dispersion estimation from DESeq2/edgeR. Covers the biological-versus-technical replication distinction (technical replicates do not add degrees of freedom for biological inference), replicate-number-versus-sequencing-depth budgeting, scRNA-seq sample-versus-cell allocation under a pseudobulk model, and the critique that "n=3" is a publication convention rather than a power calculation. Use when budgeting a sequencing experiment, writing the sample-size justification in a grant, estimating replicates from pilot data, allocating a fixed budget between samples and depth, or planning scRNA-seq cohort size. For clinical-trial sample size see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the power-given-n direction see experimental-design/power-analysis.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/HPClaw3Updated Oct 11, 2026

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/HPClaw3Updated Oct 11, 2026

Detect somatic and germline copy number variants from targeted, exome, and whole-genome sequencing with CNVkit, a read-depth caller that combines on-target and off-target (antitarget) coverage. Covers panel-of-normals construction, flat-reference tumor-only calling, hybrid/amplicon/WGS modes, CBS vs HMM segmentation selection, purity-aware integer calling, and reconciliation against GATK and allele-specific callers. Use when calling CNVs from hybrid-capture panels or exomes, deciding whether CNVkit (depth-only) is the right tool versus an allele-specific caller, building a panel of normals, diagnosing flat-reference false positives, or interpreting log2 ratios into copy-number states.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/HPClaw3Updated Oct 11, 2026

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/HPClaw3Updated Oct 11, 2026

Generate alignment statistics using samtools flagstat, stats, depth, coverage, and mosdepth. Use when assessing alignment quality, calculating coverage, or generating QC reports.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

peacezha/HPClaw3Updated Oct 11, 2026

Use this skill to understand FMCSA tire tread depth requirements. Covers steer tires (4/32 minimum) and other axles (2/32 minimum), and how to measure correctly.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

x3allamerican/skills3Updated May 17, 2026

Offensive methodology for attacking GraphQL APIs during penetration tests and bug bounty engagements. Covers the full attack lifecycle: endpoint discovery, introspection abuse and blind schema reconstruction when introspection is disabled, authentication and authorization bypass through Relay node IDs and nested object traversal, injection via variables and directives, query batching for brute force and OTP bypass, denial of service through depth bombs and alias amplification, WebSocket subscription hijacking, information disclosure through verbose errors and field suggestion oracles, and file upload abuse via the multipart GraphQL specification. Includes tool-specific guidance for InQL, graphql-cop, CrackQL, BatchQL, Altair, GraphQL Voyager, and clairvoyance. Trigger on: GraphQL, graphql, introspection query, batching attack, query depth, GraphQL injection, GraphQL IDOR, field suggestion, GraphQL auth bypass, GraphQL DoS, GraphQL security, graphql-cop, InQL, CrackQL, BatchQL, Relay node, alias amplificat...

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ajtazer/heckit2Updated Oct 7, 2026

latency-critical-systems

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Measure and improve delays in realtime dashboards, data feeds, queues, and caches. Track response times, data age, and waiting work separately, then verify that changes improve the actual behavior of a deployed system.

  • Investigating delays in realtime dashboards
  • Checking whether streamed data is still fresh
  • Reducing queue backlogs
affaan-m/ECC285.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

hyperliquid

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Retrieve Hyperliquid market data, wallet balances, positions, and recent trading history without an API key. Review trades alongside market trends and fees, or export price candles and funding payments as JSON for later analysis.

  • Check market prices, funding, and order book depth
  • Inspect wallet positions and spot balances
  • Review recent trades alongside fees and market trends
NousResearch/hermes-agent255.8KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

qa

FreeSummaryAI rating 70

Find and fix bugs in websites, APIs, command-line tools, and background processes. Choose from three testing depths, verify fixes, and receive evidence of the changes plus a summary of readiness for release.

  • Test a website and fix bugs
  • Check API or command-line behavior
  • Verify background jobs and webhook processing
garrytan/gstack137.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

pr-report

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Produces detailed HTML or Markdown reports on pull requests, branches, or large code contributions. It explains how the system works, ranks concrete findings, compares designs when needed, and recommends whether and how to merge the changes.

  • Reviewing a large pull request in depth
  • Explaining a contribution’s design and behavior
  • Comparing a design with similar systems
paperclipai/paperclip105.6KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Work through complex or costly decisions with a structured process covering context, research, competing perspectives, planning, execution, and critical review. The workflow adapts its depth to the task and produces recommendations with tradeoffs, risks, and success criteria.

  • Comparing system architecture options
  • Planning changes across multiple systems
  • Rechecking assumptions in an ambiguous request
nexu-io/open-design103.1KUpdated Oct 21, 2026