Coordinate a development task from planning through implementation and review. Choose whether to proceed after seeing the plan, then receive a report covering commits, verification results, review findings, and any work left unfinished.
- Plan, implement, and review a feature
- Review a plan before authorizing implementation
- Start implementation from an existing plan
abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus☆ 48KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Guides preparation and authorized publication of Apache Airflow changes, including existing pull request checks, remote verification, reviews, tests, rebasing, and a prefilled submission page. Also explains how to track work deferred by temporary fixes.
- Planning the steps for submitting Airflow changes
- Checking existing pull requests and Git remote destinations
- Reviewing and testing changes before pushing
apache/airflow☆ 47.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Test desktop application security across local storage, communication between processes, network traffic, and update channels. Map where trust and permissions change, then investigate weaknesses in credentials, access checks, and update verification.
- Checking how desktop apps store credentials
- Reviewing authentication between local processes
- Inspecting app traffic and API access controls
zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill☆ 42.9KUpdated Sep 22, 2026
Audit websites against WCAG 2.2, guidelines for making web content accessible. Combine automated checks with manual verification to identify barriers, prioritize issues by impact, and guide fixes to page structure and interactive components.
- Audit a website for accessibility barriers
- Review keyboard access and form labels
- Fix contrast and heading structure issues
wshobson/agents☆ 41.4KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Follow Conductor's development plans using test-driven development: write a failing test, implement the change, then improve the code. Manage phase verification, progress updates, and focused git commits as tasks move toward completion.
- Implementing tasks from plan.md
- Following the test-driven development cycle
- Verifying completion at phase checkpoints
wshobson/agents☆ 41.4KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Generate independent options for design, implementation, explanations, or debugging, then compare them using one shared rubric. Code candidates use separate working copies and undergo independent verification before a winner is presented for review.
- Comparing several plausible design approaches
- Evaluating independent implementations of the same task
- Comparing explanations or debugging approaches
codewhale-hq/Codewhale☆ 41.1KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Check a local Codewhale checkout before contributing: inspect branch and sync status, build the CLI, and run the repository’s CI checks. Present recent commits and changelog entries from local files, with clear status for each step.
- Checking a checkout before contributing
- Reviewing local changes and sync status
- Running the build and CI verification commands
codewhale-hq/Codewhale☆ 41.1KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Split multi-step coding, research, or testing into focused assignments for sub-agents, which are agents handling specific parts of a task. The parent agent retains design decisions, integration, and final verification while independent work runs in parallel.
- Exploring separate groups of files in parallel
- Assigning code changes with clear file ownership
- Running focused tests alongside other work
codewhale-hq/Codewhale☆ 41.1KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Set up the OpenViking long-term memory plugin for OpenClaw through conversation. The skill handles installation, configuration, and verification so chat facts can be saved and relevant memories recalled across sessions, using an existing OpenViking server.
- Add long-term memory to OpenClaw
- Recall saved facts across chat sessions
- Separate memories by assistant or sender
volcengine/OpenViking☆ 40.5KUpdated Oct 20, 2026
Prevent recurring coding-agent mistakes by turning repository evidence into specific instructions, automated checks, regression tests, and failure records. Also checks whether guidance has become outdated and documents changes, verification results, and follow-up work in an adoption report.
- Create agent instructions tailored to a repository
- Turn recurring mistakes into regression checks and failure records
- Detect outdated guidance and broken verification commands
github/awesome-copilot☆ 40.3KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Investigate Debian Linux issues through service checks, logs, and package tools. Receive repair commands, verification steps, and rollback guidance, with attention to AppArmor security restrictions or firewall settings when relevant.
- Investigating Debian service or package problems
- Checking whether security restrictions affect an issue
- Preparing repair, verification, and rollback steps
github/awesome-copilot☆ 40.3KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Check factual claims in AI responses by extracting statements, searching for supporting or conflicting sources, and reviewing common error patterns. Receive a linked report that highlights uncertainties and helps people verify the evidence themselves.
- Check statistics and citations in an AI-generated report
- Add ongoing factual checks to a conversation
- Review legal explanations against linked sources
github/awesome-copilot☆ 40.3KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Design an AI agent around its requirements, or audit an existing agent for architectural problems. Deliver justified decisions, verification plans, and a PDF report with a diagram, covering budgets, permissions, stopping rules, and failure handling.
- Design an agent from an idea or specification
- Audit an existing agent’s architecture
- Diagnose errors and false completion reports
github/awesome-copilot☆ 40.3KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Check security audit findings against code evidence and trace how untrusted input moves through a system. Guide a second review, document verification gaps, and assess draft reports against a minimum quality score before delivery.
- Verifying evidence behind security review findings
- Rechecking input flows after an initial analysis
- Assessing report quality before delivery
github/awesome-copilot☆ 40.3KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Diagnose Arch Linux problems by reviewing recent updates, service logs, and packages. Get a step-by-step investigation plan, ready-to-copy repair commands, verification steps, and guidance for rollback or cleanup.
- Investigating problems after an Arch Linux update
- Diagnosing services that fail to start
- Planning repairs with verification and rollback steps
github/awesome-copilot☆ 40.3KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Break a large development brief into ordered goals and save plans, progress events, blockers, and evidence in the repository. Coordinate Claude Code sessions through handoff instructions, with final completion requiring cleanup, verification, and code review evidence.
- Tracking development work across Claude Code sessions
- Managing ordered goals with attempts and evidence
- Requiring cleanup, verification, and review before completion
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode☆ 40.1KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Turn a successful workflow from the current session into a reusable OMC skill draft. Capture inputs, ordered steps, decision rules, pitfalls, and verification evidence, then choose an appropriate storage location.
- Preserving a hard-won debugging workflow
- Turning project-specific procedures into skill drafts
- Deciding whether a workflow belongs in a skill or documentation
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode☆ 40.1KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Guide a development brief through specification, dependent tickets, implementation, review, and verification. Coordinate parallel work while keeping human approval at key decisions and recording agreed vocabulary, business rules, and the reasons behind technical choices.
- Turning a development brief into a specification and tickets
- Coordinating parallel implementation across dependent tickets
- Approving acceptance criteria and testing boundaries
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode☆ 40.1KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Find the appropriate skill for the work you need to do, from clarifying requirements to implementation, review, and verification. This routing guide selects the next skill or shows a manual command without performing the work itself.
- Choosing a skill for unclear requirements
- Finding the next step after plan approval
- Locating debugging or verification skills
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode☆ 40.1KUpdated Oct 21, 2026
Check training data and machine learning models for malicious changes, including backdoors that cause unexpected behavior on specific inputs. Combine data quality checks, model analysis, and file integrity verification, then document findings and retest after remediation.
- Screening third-party data before training
- Checking downloaded model weights before deployment
- Investigating unexpected behavior on specific inputs
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills☆ 34.8KUpdated Aug 31, 2026
Plan authorized voice phishing assessments to evaluate how employees verify callers and report suspicious calls. Organize approved scenarios, record assessment outcomes, and summarize disclosure, verification, and reporting rates to review security awareness training.
- Planning an authorized voice phishing assessment
- Evaluating caller verification and security reporting
- Reviewing the effectiveness of security awareness training
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills☆ 34.8KUpdated Aug 31, 2026
Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.
- Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
- Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
- Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills☆ 34.8KUpdated Aug 31, 2026
Official · CodexFreeSummary Compose compact, structured prompts for coding, debugging, review, and research with Codex or GPT-5.4. This internal skill defines task scope, completion criteria, output format, verification steps, and evidence requirements using consistent XML tags.
- Define implementation scope and completion criteria
- Include verification steps in debugging requests
- Specify evidence requirements for code reviews
openai/codex-plugin-cc☆ 34.4KUpdated Jul 8, 2026
Create a saved plan for multiple goals in a repository, then execute it step by step with Codex goal mode. Track progress, verification evidence, review results, and blockers before marking the plan complete.
- Break a project brief into multiple goals
- Execute planned tasks in sequence
- Record progress and verification evidence
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex☆ 33.6KUpdated Oct 21, 2026