25 skills · sorted by relevance
Review code changes for bugs, security risks, design issues, and test quality, then turn findings into specific, prioritized feedback. Use its checklists and comment templates to establish consistent review standards and support developer mentoring.
Help junior developers and AI newcomers understand code through guided questions and progressive hints. Support debugging, concept learning, and critical review of AI-generated code so learners can explain their reasoning and work toward solutions themselves.
Structure a student's self-determined project with mentoring checkpoints, competency alignment, and reflection. Use when guiding student-led projects within a competency-based framework.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Structure a student's self-determined project with mentoring checkpoints, competency alignment, and reflection. Use when guiding student-led projects within a competency-based framework.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Socratic mentoring for junior developers and AI newcomers. Guides through questions, never answers. Triggers: "help me understand", "explain this code", "I'm stuck", "Im stuck", "I'm confused", "Im confused", "I don't understand", "I dont understand", "can you teach me", "teach me", "mentor me", "guide me", "what does this error mean", "why doesn't this work", "why does not this work", "I'm a beginner", "Im a beginner", "I'm learning", "Im learning", "I'm new to this", "Im new to this", "walk me through", "how does this work", "what's wrong with my code", "what's wrong", "can you break this down", "ELI5", "step by step", "where do I start", "what am I missing", "newbie here", "junior dev", "first time using", "how do I", "what is", "is this right", "not sure", "need help", "struggling", "show me", "help me debug", "best practice", "too complex", "overwhelmed", "lost", "debug this", "/socratic", "/hint", "/concept", "/pseudocode". Progressive clue systems, teaching techniques, and success metrics.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Develop a research question, search and verify literature, and combine findings into an academic report. Modes also support guided research discussions, claim checking, paper comparisons, and systematic reviews with optional meta-analysis, which statistically combines study results.
Review code changes through a structured check of requirements, design, correctness, security, performance, and tests. Produce specific, constructive feedback that separates required fixes from optional suggestions, and build shared review guidelines for a development team.
Develop a research question, search and verify literature, combine findings, and produce a structured report. Seven modes cover guided research discussions, briefs, literature reviews, fact-checking, and systematic reviews, with statistical pooling of study results when appropriate.
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Java 8, PHP, Ruby, Rails, Python, Django, FastAPI, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, Swift, Dart, Flutter, NestJS, C/C++, Zig, CSS/Less/Sass, Qt, and more. Covers architecture review, performance review, security audit, code quality anti-patterns, and common bugs across all ecosystems. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, performance reviews, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Generate a coaching conversation guide with questions, protocols, and follow-up actions for a teaching focus. Use when preparing for coaching sessions, mentoring, or peer feedback conversations.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Generate a coaching conversation guide with questions, protocols, and follow-up actions for a teaching focus. Use when preparing for coaching sessions, mentoring, or peer feedback conversations.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a user, especially a new hire, asks for mentoring, guidance, or explanation of infrastructure or engineering practices. Not for code changes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biology Professor at a research university — writing or defending an NIH/NSF grant budget, deciding authorship order on a paper, navigating an IACUC or biosafety protocol, mentoring a PhD student through a stalled project, or converting a course when active-learning data doesn't match student pushback.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a postsecondary Anthropology or Archaeology professor — designing a gen-ed or major-track course, building a tenure or promotion dossier, defending a department against an enrollment-driven program review, mentoring a graduate student's fieldwork grant application, or writing an IRB/NAGPRA-compliant fieldwork plan.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Help other designers develop judgment without imposing your style. Use when mentoring designers, running design education, or building team-wide quality standards.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.