Results for “viewer”

Add a viewer, configure a viewer, change viewer options, find viewer, close viewer, view a scatter plot, bar chart, histogram, line chart, box plot, pie chart, heat map, correlation plot, 3D scatter, trellis, density plot, statistics, on a Datagrok TableView via the datagrok_exec tool. Use whenever the user asks to plot, chart, visualize, show a graph, draw a distribution, color by a column, swap a viewer's axis, toggle a legend / regression line / log scale, replace one viewer with another, close every chart, reset the view to just the grid, or find an existing viewer by type. Plugin viewers like "Chem space", "sequence space", "activity cliffs" are NOT viewer types — they're registered functions — route those to `grok.functions.call`. Does NOT cover filtering (separate skill `datagrok-filtering`), selection (`datagrok-selection`), grid cell rendering (`datagrok-grid-customization`), layout save/restore, or custom-viewer authoring.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

5つの専門エージェント（backend-reviewer, frontend-reviewer, test-reviewer, security-reviewer, ux-reviewer）がチームでコードレビューするスキル。 git diff ベースで変更ファイルを検出し、各専門家が並列でレビューして 統合レポート（Markdown）を docs/reviews/ に出力する。 Use when: コードレビューしたい、変更をレビュー、レビューチーム、 チームレビュー、実装をチェック、品質チェック。 Triggers: "レビュー", "review", "コードレビュー", "code review", "チームレビュー", "team review", "変更をチェック", "品質チェック"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Uncorrelated Evaluator — 4軸ルーブリック専門エージェント（functionality-reviewer・code-reviewer・design-reviewer・originality-reviewer）と security-reviewer を5並列実行し、成果物を多面的に独立評価します。PASS / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED 判定を返します。Self-leniency 防止のため、実装エージェントのコンテキストを引き継がない新規エージェントとして起動します。「レビューして」「評価して」「実装を確認して」などのリクエストで起動します。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Create, edit, and validate SDFormat files that describe robots and simulation worlds. Check coordinate frames, joints, geometry, and physical properties, review models in CAD Viewer, and report assumptions and compatibility risks before simulator handoff.

• Create reusable robot models or simulation worlds
• Review coordinate frames, joint axes, and inertial properties
• Validate SDF files and inspect models in CAD Viewer

Collect Trustpilot reviews for a company domain, with filters for ratings, language, dates, and reply status. Get structured review text, reviewer details, and company responses across pages to support reputation research and customer service analysis.

• Collect low-rated reviews to study customer complaints
• Gather reviews for competitor reputation comparisons
• Collect company replies and their publication dates

Draft, audit, or revise responses to reviewers for Nature-family journals. Links each reviewer concern to manuscript evidence or a documented change, and identifies unanswered comments, missing author input, and issues that need resolution before submission.

• Drafting responses for major or minor manuscript revisions
• Checking a response draft for unanswered reviewer comments
• Linking responses to manuscript changes

Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Guide changes to RDD reviewer integrations through a shared Go contract, a common set of processing rules. Define adapter boundaries, validate result handling, and check that runtime migrations preserve existing review outcomes.

• Moving reviewer invocation into a shared Go contract
• Checking that adapters only invoke reviewers and return raw output
• Verifying review outcomes during a runtime migration

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Simulate peer review through five perspectives covering journal fit, methods, subject expertise, interdisciplinary implications, and counterarguments. Receive separate review reports, an editorial decision, and a revision roadmap, or check whether revisions address earlier comments.

• Simulate peer review before journal submission
• Check research methods and statistical validity
• Test core arguments against counterarguments

Guides development of apps for viewing USD, a 3D scene format. Selects browser streaming or local implementation references, covering rendering, camera controls, selection, interface layout, and validation while keeping users’ scene files unchanged.

• Build a browser viewer for USD scenes
• Develop a local workstation viewer
• Add camera controls and object selection

Use when adding or changing what the rezolus viewer exposes — an /api/v1 endpoint, a dashboard section, the metric catalog, metadata/description derivation, or the frontend data those depend on — or when editing src/viewer/ or crates/viewer/, or reviewing a viewer change. The viewer ships as two separate Rust backends (server + WASM) behind one shared frontend; changing one silently diverges them.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Web 线上展览开发 (虚拟展厅) (Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。) Master OS — automated mastery of Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「线上展览」「虚拟展厅」「web 线上展览」「云展厅」「数字展馆」

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Turn a Markdown code review into a single HTML file with code changes beside severity-labeled comments. Readers can jump to findings, inspect line numbers, and identify the named human reviewer.

• Turning a lengthy Markdown code review into HTML
• Reading code changes beside review comments
• Jumping directly to findings by severity

Organize paper reviews into individual concerns and draft responses within venue limits. Track evidence, unanswered issues, and approved commitments, then produce reviewer replies and a revision checklist that can be updated during follow-up rounds.

• Planning responses to multiple reviewers
• Drafting a rebuttal within a character limit
• Preparing separate replies for reviewer threads

Stress-test a paper with a focused rejection argument, then have a separate reviewer assess each objection against the current text. The report identifies unresolved weaknesses, their severity, and priority fixes for submission or rebuttal preparation.

• Stress-testing a theory paper before submission
• Preparing responses to the strongest reviewer objection
• Checking whether the title overstates the results

Run repeated code reviews and fixes using an installed reviewer chosen by the user. The workflow tracks findings across rounds, checks that edits stay within scope, and reports whether blocking issues were resolved or further decisions are needed.

• Repeat reviews and fixes for a module
• Improve code using a specific installed reviewer
• Keep automated edits within an agreed file scope

Run the end-to-end viewer smoke test (`tests/viewer_smoke.sh`). Spawns `rezolus view` in upload-only, file, A/B, and proxy modes, exercises the API endpoints, and verifies experiment attach/detach. Use after any change touching `src/viewer/` or before opening a viewer-related PR.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Analyze Git changes before submitting or merging a pull request. Assess risk and complexity, classify changes, suggest reviewer roles, and identify files needing closer inspection using diff statistics and file-level risk analysis.

• Assess change risks before submitting a pull request
• Review large changes spanning multiple modules
• Identify reviewer roles suited to the changes

Add interactive features to published Artifact pages using supported runtime capabilities, features granted by the viewer environment. Build saved checklists, shared data views, connector integrations, Claude-powered interactions, and file uploads or downloads with permission-aware behavior.

• Build polls and checklists that save changes
• Create task boards with shared data
• Display connected data on an Artifact page

Create step-by-step code walkthroughs tailored to readers such as new contributors, reviewers, or bug fixers. Produce CodeTour .tour files linked to verified files and line numbers, with explanations of behavior, design choices, and pitfalls.

• Create a code walkthrough for new team members
• Guide reviewers through a PR and its risks
• Trace code involved in a bug or incident

Review an iOS app’s code, settings, and submission materials for App Store rejection risks. Receive prioritized findings with supporting evidence, concrete fixes, verification steps, and draft notes to help reviewers test the app.

• Check an iOS app before App Store submission
• Review privacy, permissions, and in-app purchases
• Investigate rejection risks in login and user content flows

Break a development task into small requirements with explicit acceptance criteria, then repeat implementation and verification while saving progress. Completion depends on evidence for each requirement and reviewer approval, with configurable reviewers and a final cleanup check.

• Carrying a multi-step implementation through verification
• Resuming work with recorded progress
• Tracking evidence for each requirement