Measure web page speed, API response times, and build or test duration. Save baseline measurements as JSON tracked in Git, then compare results before and after changes to identify performance regressions and assess launch targets.
Measure performance baselines and detect regressions across browser Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS, page weight), API endpoint latency percentiles, and build/test feedback times, with before/after comparison stored in git-tracked .ecc/benchmarks JSON. Use when checking page speed, responding to 'it feels slow' reports, verifying launch performance targets, or comparing stack alternatives.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Measures real browser metrics via browser MCP:
1. Navigate to each target URL
2. Measure Core Web Vitals:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) — target < 2.5s
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) — target < 0.1
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) — target < 200ms
- FCP (First Contentful Paint) — target < 1.8s
- TTFB (Time to First Byte) — target < 800ms
3. Measure resource sizes:
- Total page weight (target < 1MB)
- JS bundle size (target < 200KB gzipped)
- CSS size
- Image weight
- Third-party script weight
4. Count network requests
5. Check for render-blocking resources
Benchmarks API endpoints:
1. Hit each endpoint 100 times
2. Measure: p50, p95, p99 latency
3. Track: response size, status codes
4. Test under load: 10 concurrent requests
5. Compare against SLA targets
Measures development feedback loop:
1. Cold build time
2. Hot reload time (HMR)
3. Test suite duration
4. TypeScript check time
5. Lint time
6. Docker build time
Run before and after a change to measure impact:
/benchmark baseline # saves current metrics
# ... make changes ...
/benchmark compare # compares against baseline
Output:
| Metric | Before | After | Delta | Verdict |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|---------|
| LCP | 1.2s | 1.4s | +200ms | WARNING: WARN |
| Bundle | 180KB | 175KB | -5KB | ✓ BETTER |
| Build | 12s | 14s | +2s | WARNING: WARN |
Stores baselines in .ecc/benchmarks/ as JSON. Git-tracked so the team shares baselines.
/benchmark compare on every PR/canary-watch for post-deploy monitoring/browser-qa for full pre-ship checklistNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.
Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.
Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.
Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.
Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.
Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.