Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

blender-motion-state-inspection

Inspect Blender characters and animations using bone data, coordinates, and ground contact measurements alongside images. Helps diagnose foot sliding, orientation mismatches, and twisting, with reports that distinguish confirmed problems from likely causes and required fixes.

OriginalShow the original description

Use this skill when inspecting Blender characters, rigs, poses, animation retargeting, ground contact, facing direction, or model-vs-motion alignment where screenshots alone are not enough.

Works withBlender
See how to install

Good for

  • Checking foot sliding and floor penetration in a walk cycle
  • Comparing character facing direction with travel direction
  • Inspecting poses after transferring motion between skeletons
  • Checking imported model shape and scale before animation review

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Blender Motion State Inspection

When to Use

  • A Blender character looks twisted, mirrored, flattened, offset, or foot-sliding in an animation.
  • A user asks whether an imported avatar, armature, or retargeted motion matches an expected pose.
  • You need to compare rendered evidence with structured facts such as bones, bounding boxes, contacts, and facing vectors.
  • A workflow depends on deciding whether a model is a character, prop, proxy mesh, control rig, or broken import.

Core Principle

Do not judge animated 3D assets only from screenshots. Screenshots are review evidence, but they hide axis conventions, bone names, object scale, local transforms, parented meshes, material slots, and frame-by-frame contact state.

First extract structured Blender state, then use viewport screenshots or renders to confirm what the facts imply.

How It Works

  1. Establish the clean scene and asset baseline before judging motion.
  2. Extract structured facts from Blender using an exporter or Blender Python run inside Blender's own interpreter.
  3. Sample the frames most likely to expose contact, orientation, scale, and retargeting errors.
  4. Compare the measured facts against the user's expected pose, direction, ground plane, and render goal.
  5. Return a concise report that separates confirmed facts, likely causes, and required fixes.

Inspection Workflow

  1. Inventory the scene.

    • List meshes, armatures, empties, cameras, lights, modifiers, parent relationships, and hidden objects.
    • Separate character meshes from helper/proxy geometry before judging the avatar.
    • Record object-space and world-space bounding boxes.
  2. Identify the skeleton.

    • Capture armature names, pose bones, bone heads/tails, roll, parent chains, constraints, and rest-pose axes.
    • Map semantic bones such as hips, spine, neck, head, shoulders, elbows, hands, thighs, knees, ankles, and feet.
    • Flag missing left/right pairs and unusual naming schemes.
  3. Determine forward, up, and side axes.

    • Use the pelvis, spine, shoulders, hips, head, and feet together; do not rely on a single mesh normal.
    • Compare local armature axes with world axes and imported file conventions such as glTF Y-up vs Blender Z-up.
    • Mark likely mirrored or backwards imports when face/head/feet direction conflicts with root motion.
  4. Sample animation frames.

    • Inspect first, middle, contact, airborne, and extreme frames.
    • Record root location, root heading, pelvis height, torso lean, limb directions, foot clearance, and mesh bounds.
    • For long or fast motion, sample more densely around flips, landings, turns, collisions, and floor contacts.
  5. Check model integrity before retargeting blame.

    • Confirm the clean baseline shape before applying animation.
    • Preserve original mesh, materials, armature, and skinning unless the user explicitly asks for repair.
    • Treat unexplained sphere-like blobs, giant proxy meshes, or crushed bodies as import/selection issues until proven otherwise.
  6. Diagnose contact and motion issues.

    • Ground penetration: compare lowest foot or shoe vertices with floor height per frame.
    • Foot sliding: compare foot world positions across planted frames.
    • Leg crossover: compare left/right thigh, knee, ankle, and foot side ordering.
    • Twist damage: compare bone swing direction separately from roll/twist around the limb axis.
    • Scale drift: compare animated mesh bounds against the clean baseline bounds.
  7. Report facts before opinions.

    • Include frame numbers, object names, bone names, world coordinates, and thresholds.
    • Separate confirmed failures from visual suspicions.
    • Attach screenshots only after the structured state explains what to look for.

Recommended Report Shape

## Blender Motion Inspection

### Scene Inventory
- Character candidates:
- Armatures:
- Helper/proxy objects:
- Cameras/lights:

### Orientation
- World up:
- Character forward:
- Root heading:
- Mirrored/backwards risk:

### Baseline Integrity
- Clean mesh bounds:
- Animated mesh bounds:
- Materials/skin preserved:
- Suspicious non-character meshes:

### Frame Findings
| Frame | Finding | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Clean baseline pose | hips/spine/feet aligned |
| 96 | Foot penetrates floor | left_foot min_z = -0.04 |

### Verdict
- Pass/fail:
- Required fix:
- Render readiness:

Examples

Walk Cycle With Foot Sliding

Scenario: a retargeted character appears to skate during a walk cycle, but the front camera angle makes the foot contact hard to judge.

Apply the workflow:

  • Inventory the scene: character mesh HeroBody, armature HeroRig, ground plane Floor, no hidden proxy meshes.
  • Identify the skeleton: semantic feet are foot.L and foot.R; hips are pelvis; root bone is root.
  • Sample animation frames: inspect frames 1, 18, 24, 30, 42, and 48 around planted-foot moments.
  • Diagnose contact and motion issues: compare world-space foot locations during planted frames.

Extracted facts:

FrameFactEvidence
18Left foot is plantedfoot.L min_z = 0.004, toe and heel both near floor
24Left foot slides while plantedfoot.L x = 0.21 -> 0.28 over six frames
30Pelvis keeps moving forwardpelvis y = 1.14 -> 1.31

Verdict: fail for render readiness. The motion needs foot-lock cleanup or retargeting constraint review; the body mesh does not need proportion changes.

Backwards Imported Character

Scenario: a character looks correct in a still frame, but the animation moves opposite the expected travel direction.

Apply the workflow:

  • Determine forward, up, and side axes: compare head, chest, feet, and root motion.
  • Sample animation frames: inspect frame 1 and the midpoint of the travel path.
  • Report facts before opinions: include the root heading and model-facing direction separately.

Extracted facts:

FrameFactEvidence
1Character face points toward world -Yhead/chest vector from neck to head resolves to -Y
72Root motion travels toward world +Yroot y = 0.0 -> 2.8
72Feet remain visually forward-facing opposite traveltoe bones point -Y while displacement is +Y

Verdict: likely backwards import or retargeting forward-axis mismatch. Fix the import/retarget axis mapping before editing animation curves.

Practical Thresholds

  • Assume Blender's default meter-scale units unless the scene unit scale says otherwise.
  • Treat ground penetration above 1-2 cm as visible unless the floor is soft or intentionally stylized.
  • Treat a sudden scale change above 5% as a likely rig, constraint, or transform inheritance problem.
  • Treat left/right ankle side-order flips during airborne inverted motion as leg crossover risk even if it recovers later.
  • Treat root heading jumps above 30 degrees per frame as suspicious unless the source motion includes a snap turn.

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not modify body proportions to force pose matching unless the task is explicitly mesh repair.
  • Do not bake away the clean baseline before recording it.
  • Do not use one rendered camera angle as proof that a pose is correct.
  • Do not delete helper objects until you have recorded why they are not part of the character.
  • Do not assume an avatar faces +Y, -Y, +X, or -X without checking head, feet, torso, and root motion together.

Tooling Notes

If a Blender state exporter is available, prefer JSON that includes meshes, armatures, pose bones, materials, contacts, bounding boxes, and sampled animation frames. If no exporter exists, run a small Blender Python script through Blender itself, for example blender --background scene.blend --python collect_motion_state.py, because bpy is not available in a normal system Python interpreter.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummary

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.3KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill