Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

golang-testing

Helps build Go tests using a test-first workflow. Covers grouped test cases, HTTP response checks, performance benchmarks, fuzzing to explore generated inputs, and coverage reports showing which code was exercised by tests.

OriginalShow the original description

Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices. Use when writing Go tests — table-driven cases, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, or coverage.

AI rating90/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Developing Go functions with tests written first
  • Adding normal and error cases to existing tests
  • Measuring execution time and memory allocations
  • Exploring unexpected inputs with fuzz tests

Overview

What it does

Adds tests that check the behavior of Go code and benchmarks that measure its performance. Examples cover table-driven tests, which list inputs and expected results together; subtests for organizing related cases; HTTP response checks; and mocks that stand in for dependencies. It also covers fuzzing, which generates inputs automatically to test code, and coverage checks showing which parts of the code ran during tests.

When it helps

Use it to adopt test-driven development, or TDD: write a test first, confirm that it fails, and then implement the code. It also helps add error cases to existing code or compare execution time and memory allocations. You can review ways to keep tests maintainable, including shared setup, temporary file management, and cleanup when tests finish.

Example requests

  • “Write tests for this Go function before implementing it, including success and error cases.”
  • “Add benchmarks for string processing and fuzz tests for input validation.”

Notes

Running the examples requires a Go environment. Standard fuzzing requires Go 1.18 or later. Parallel execution is intended for independent tests, and test connections and files should be cleaned up when tests finish. GitHub Actions execution examples are also included.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodThe activation list explicitly covers Go test creation, performance measurement, input validation, and TDD.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodExamples show TDD stages, go test results, table-driven tests, and temporary file handling.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodTemporary files use t.TempDir, and updating expected output files requires an explicit flag.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackinggo test execution examples are provided, but dependency installation for the sqlite3 example is not described.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md16.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Go Testing Patterns

Comprehensive Go testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology.

When to Activate

  • Writing new Go functions or methods
  • Adding test coverage to existing code
  • Creating benchmarks for performance-critical code
  • Implementing fuzz tests for input validation
  • Following TDD workflow in Go projects

TDD Workflow for Go

The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle

RED     → Write a failing test first
GREEN   → Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR → Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT  → Continue with next requirement

Step-by-Step TDD in Go

// Step 1: Define the interface/signature
// calculator.go
package calculator

func Add(a, b int) int {
    panic("not implemented") // Placeholder
}

// Step 2: Write failing test (RED)
// calculator_test.go
package calculator

import "testing"

func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    got := Add(2, 3)
    want := 5
    if got != want {
        t.Errorf("Add(2, 3) = %d; want %d", got, want)
    }
}

// Step 3: Run test - verify FAIL
// $ go test
// --- FAIL: TestAdd (0.00s)
// panic: not implemented

// Step 4: Implement minimal code (GREEN)
func Add(a, b int) int {
    return a + b
}

// Step 5: Run test - verify PASS
// $ go test
// PASS

// Step 6: Refactor if needed, verify tests still pass

Table-Driven Tests

The standard pattern for Go tests. Enables comprehensive coverage with minimal code.

func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name     string
        a, b     int
        expected int
    }{
        {"positive numbers", 2, 3, 5},
        {"negative numbers", -1, -2, -3},
        {"zero values", 0, 0, 0},
        {"mixed signs", -1, 1, 0},
        {"large numbers", 1000000, 2000000, 3000000},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
            if got != tt.expected {
                t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d; want %d",
                    tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.expected)
            }
        })
    }
}

Table-Driven Tests with Error Cases

func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name    string
        input   string
        want    *Config
        wantErr bool
    }{
        {
            name:  "valid config",
            input: `{"host": "localhost", "port": 8080}`,
            want:  &Config{Host: "localhost", Port: 8080},
        },
        {
            name:    "invalid JSON",
            input:   `{invalid}`,
            wantErr: true,
        },
        {
            name:    "empty input",
            input:   "",
            wantErr: true,
        },
        {
            name:  "minimal config",
            input: `{}`,
            want:  &Config{}, // Zero value config
        },
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got, err := ParseConfig(tt.input)

            if tt.wantErr {
                if err == nil {
                    t.Error("expected error, got nil")
                }
                return
            }

            if err != nil {
                t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
            }

            if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.want) {
                t.Errorf("got %+v; want %+v", got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Subtests and Sub-benchmarks

Organizing Related Tests

func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
    // Setup shared by all subtests
    db := setupTestDB(t)

    t.Run("Create", func(t *testing.T) {
        user := &User{Name: "Alice"}
        err := db.CreateUser(user)
        if err != nil {
            t.Fatalf("CreateUser failed: %v", err)
        }
        if user.ID == "" {
            t.Error("expected user ID to be set")
        }
    })

    t.Run("Get", func(t *testing.T) {
        user, err := db.GetUser("alice-id")
        if err != nil {
            t.Fatalf("GetUser failed: %v", err)
        }
        if user.Name != "Alice" {
            t.Errorf("got name %q; want %q", user.Name, "Alice")
        }
    })

    t.Run("Update", func(t *testing.T) {
        // ...
    })

    t.Run("Delete", func(t *testing.T) {
        // ...
    })
}

Parallel Subtests

func TestParallel(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name  string
        input string
    }{
        {"case1", "input1"},
        {"case2", "input2"},
        {"case3", "input3"},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        tt := tt // Capture range variable
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            t.Parallel() // Run subtests in parallel
            result := Process(tt.input)
            // assertions...
            _ = result
        })
    }
}

Test Helpers

Helper Functions

func setupTestDB(t *testing.T) *sql.DB {
    t.Helper() // Marks this as a helper function

    db, err := sql.Open("sqlite3", ":memory:")
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("failed to open database: %v", err)
    }

    // Cleanup when test finishes
    t.Cleanup(func() {
        db.Close()
    })

    // Run migrations
    if _, err := db.Exec(schema); err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("failed to create schema: %v", err)
    }

    return db
}

func assertNoError(t *testing.T, err error) {
    t.Helper()
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
    }
}

func assertEqual[T comparable](t *testing.T, got, want T) {
    t.Helper()
    if got != want {
        t.Errorf("got %v; want %v", got, want)
    }
}

Temporary Files and Directories

func TestFileProcessing(t *testing.T) {
    // Create temp directory - automatically cleaned up
    tmpDir := t.TempDir()

    // Create test file
    testFile := filepath.Join(tmpDir, "test.txt")
    err := os.WriteFile(testFile, []byte("test content"), 0644)
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("failed to create test file: %v", err)
    }

    // Run test
    result, err := ProcessFile(testFile)
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("ProcessFile failed: %v", err)
    }

    // Assert...
    _ = result
}

Golden Files

Testing against expected output files stored in testdata/.

var update = flag.Bool("update", false, "update golden files")

func TestRender(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name  string
        input Template
    }{
        {"simple", Template{Name: "test"}},
        {"complex", Template{Name: "test", Items: []string{"a", "b"}}},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := Render(tt.input)

            golden := filepath.Join("testdata", tt.name+".golden")

            if *update {
                // Update golden file: go test -update
                err := os.WriteFile(golden, got, 0644)
                if err != nil {
                    t.Fatalf("failed to update golden file: %v", err)
                }
            }

            want, err := os.ReadFile(golden)
            if err != nil {
                t.Fatalf("failed to read golden file: %v", err)
            }

            if !bytes.Equal(got, want) {
                t.Errorf("output mismatch:\ngot:\n%s\nwant:\n%s", got, want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Mocking with Interfaces

Interface-Based Mocking

// Define interface for dependencies
type UserRepository interface {
    GetUser(id string) (*User, error)
    SaveUser(user *User) error
}

// Production implementation
type PostgresUserRepository struct {
    db *sql.DB
}

func (r *PostgresUserRepository) GetUser(id string) (*User, error) {
    // Real database query
}

// Mock implementation for tests
type MockUserRepository struct {
    GetUserFunc  func(id string) (*User, error)
    SaveUserFunc func(user *User) error
}

func (m *MockUserRepository) GetUser(id string) (*User, error) {
    return m.GetUserFunc(id)
}

func (m *MockUserRepository) SaveUser(user *User) error {
    return m.SaveUserFunc(user)
}

// Test using mock
func TestUserService(t *testing.T) {
    mock := &MockUserRepository{
        GetUserFunc: func(id string) (*User, error) {
            if id == "123" {
                return &User{ID: "123", Name: "Alice"}, nil
            }
            return nil, ErrNotFound
        },
    }

    service := NewUserService(mock)

    user, err := service.GetUserProfile("123")
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
    }
    if user.Name != "Alice" {
        t.Errorf("got name %q; want %q", user.Name, "Alice")
    }
}

Benchmarks

Basic Benchmarks

func BenchmarkProcess(b *testing.B) {
    data := generateTestData(1000)
    b.ResetTimer() // Don't count setup time

    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
        Process(data)
    }
}

// Run: go test -bench=BenchmarkProcess -benchmem
// Output: BenchmarkProcess-8   10000   105234 ns/op   4096 B/op   10 allocs/op

Benchmark with Different Sizes

func BenchmarkSort(b *testing.B) {
    sizes := []int{100, 1000, 10000, 100000}

    for _, size := range sizes {
        b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("size=%d", size), func(b *testing.B) {
            data := generateRandomSlice(size)
            b.ResetTimer()

            for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
                // Make a copy to avoid sorting already sorted data
                tmp := make([]int, len(data))
                copy(tmp, data)
                sort.Ints(tmp)
            }
        })
    }
}

Memory Allocation Benchmarks

func BenchmarkStringConcat(b *testing.B) {
    parts := []string{"hello", "world", "foo", "bar", "baz"}

    b.Run("plus", func(b *testing.B) {
        for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
            var s string
            for _, p := range parts {
                s += p
            }
            _ = s
        }
    })

    b.Run("builder", func(b *testing.B) {
        for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
            var sb strings.Builder
            for _, p := range parts {
                sb.WriteString(p)
            }
            _ = sb.String()
        }
    })

    b.Run("join", func(b *testing.B) {
        for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
            _ = strings.Join(parts, "")
        }
    })
}

Fuzzing (Go 1.18+)

Basic Fuzz Test

func FuzzParseJSON(f *testing.F) {
    // Add seed corpus
    f.Add(`{"name": "test"}`)
    f.Add(`{"count": 123}`)
    f.Add(`[]`)
    f.Add(`""`)

    f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
        var result map[string]interface{}
        err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(input), &result)

        if err != nil {
            // Invalid JSON is expected for random input
            return
        }

        // If parsing succeeded, re-encoding should work
        _, err = json.Marshal(result)
        if err != nil {
            t.Errorf("Marshal failed after successful Unmarshal: %v", err)
        }
    })
}

// Run: go test -fuzz=FuzzParseJSON -fuzztime=30s

Fuzz Test with Multiple Inputs

func FuzzCompare(f *testing.F) {
    f.Add("hello", "world")
    f.Add("", "")
    f.Add("abc", "abc")

    f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, a, b string) {
        result := Compare(a, b)

        // Property: Compare(a, a) should always equal 0
        if a == b && result != 0 {
            t.Errorf("Compare(%q, %q) = %d; want 0", a, b, result)
        }

        // Property: Compare(a, b) and Compare(b, a) should have opposite signs
        reverse := Compare(b, a)
        if (result > 0 && reverse >= 0) || (result < 0 && reverse <= 0) {
            if result != 0 || reverse != 0 {
                t.Errorf("Compare(%q, %q) = %d, Compare(%q, %q) = %d; inconsistent",
                    a, b, result, b, a, reverse)
            }
        }
    })
}

Test Coverage

Running Coverage

# Basic coverage
go test -cover ./...

# Generate coverage profile
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

# View coverage in browser
go tool cover -html=coverage.out

# View coverage by function
go tool cover -func=coverage.out

# Coverage with race detection
go test -race -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

Coverage Targets

Code TypeTarget
Critical business logic100%
Public APIs90%+
General code80%+
Generated codeExclude

Excluding Generated Code from Coverage

//go:generate mockgen -source=interface.go -destination=mock_interface.go

// In coverage profile, exclude with build tags:
// go test -cover -tags=!generate ./...

HTTP Handler Testing

func TestHealthHandler(t *testing.T) {
    // Create request
    req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, "/health", nil)
    w := httptest.NewRecorder()

    // Call handler
    HealthHandler(w, req)

    // Check response
    resp := w.Result()
    defer resp.Body.Close()

    if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {
        t.Errorf("got status %d; want %d", resp.StatusCode, http.StatusOK)
    }

    body, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
    if string(body) != "OK" {
        t.Errorf("got body %q; want %q", body, "OK")
    }
}

func TestAPIHandler(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name       string
        method     string
        path       string
        body       string
        wantStatus int
        wantBody   string
    }{
        {
            name:       "get user",
            method:     http.MethodGet,
            path:       "/users/123",
            wantStatus: http.StatusOK,
            wantBody:   `{"id":"123","name":"Alice"}`,
        },
        {
            name:       "not found",
            method:     http.MethodGet,
            path:       "/users/999",
            wantStatus: http.StatusNotFound,
        },
        {
            name:       "create user",
            method:     http.MethodPost,
            path:       "/users",
            body:       `{"name":"Bob"}`,
            wantStatus: http.StatusCreated,
        },
    }

    handler := NewAPIHandler()

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            var body io.Reader
            if tt.body != "" {
                body = strings.NewReader(tt.body)
            }

            req := httptest.NewRequest(tt.method, tt.path, body)
            req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
            w := httptest.NewRecorder()

            handler.ServeHTTP(w, req)

            if w.Code != tt.wantStatus {
                t.Errorf("got status %d; want %d", w.Code, tt.wantStatus)
            }

            if tt.wantBody != "" && w.Body.String() != tt.wantBody {
                t.Errorf("got body %q; want %q", w.Body.String(), tt.wantBody)
            }
        })
    }
}

Testing Commands

# Run all tests
go test ./...

# Run tests with verbose output
go test -v ./...

# Run specific test
go test -run TestAdd ./...

# Run tests matching pattern
go test -run "TestUser/Create" ./...

# Run tests with race detector
go test -race ./...

# Run tests with coverage
go test -cover -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

# Run short tests only
go test -short ./...

# Run tests with timeout
go test -timeout 30s ./...

# Run benchmarks
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./...

# Run fuzzing
go test -fuzz=FuzzParse -fuzztime=30s ./...

# Count test runs (for flaky test detection)
go test -count=10 ./...

Best Practices

DO:

  • Write tests FIRST (TDD)
  • Use table-driven tests for comprehensive coverage
  • Test behavior, not implementation
  • Use t.Helper() in helper functions
  • Use t.Parallel() for independent tests
  • Clean up resources with t.Cleanup()
  • Use meaningful test names that describe the scenario

DON'T:

  • Test private functions directly (test through public API)
  • Use time.Sleep() in tests (use channels or conditions)
  • Ignore flaky tests (fix or remove them)
  • Mock everything (prefer integration tests when possible)
  • Skip error path testing

Integration with CI/CD

# GitHub Actions example
test:
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest
  steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v4
    - uses: actions/setup-go@v5
      with:
        go-version: '1.22'

    - name: Run tests
      run: go test -race -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

    - name: Check coverage
      run: |
        go tool cover -func=coverage.out | grep total | awk '{print $3}' | \
        awk -F'%' '{if ($1 < 80) exit 1}'

Remember: Tests are documentation. They show how your code is meant to be used. Write them clearly and keep them up to date.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill