Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

nestjs-patterns

Build or review NestJS backends with clear module boundaries, request validation, access controls, and consistent error handling. The skill guides TypeScript service structure, environment configuration, database integration, and testing for production use.

OriginalShow the original description

NestJS architecture patterns for modules, controllers, providers, DTO validation, guards, interceptors, config, and production-grade TypeScript backends. Use when building or reviewing a NestJS backend — modules, providers, DTO validation, guards, or interceptors.

AI rating90/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Structuring a new NestJS API
  • Adding request validation and access controls
  • Reviewing error handling and environment settings
  • Testing services and HTTP endpoints

Overview

What it does

Organize a NestJS API or service, from code structure through input validation, authentication, exception handling, and testing. The skill separates code into feature modules and clarifies responsibilities: controllers handle HTTP input and output, while services handle business logic. It also covers validating DTOs, the types used to transfer data, and designing responses that exclude internal information.

When it helps

Use it when planning a new backend or reviewing an existing implementation. It helps organize production checks for access controls, consistent error responses, environment variable validation at startup, and separation of database operations. Testing covers both individual services and HTTP requests.

Example requests

  • “Design a NestJS user management API with separate feature modules and services.”
  • “Review input validation, access controls, and error responses.”
  • “Set up API tests using the same validation settings as production.”

Notes

This skill is for NestJS and TypeScript backends. Its input validation examples use class-validator. Integration with Prisma or TypeORM is handled according to the project's existing architecture.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodThe activation section explicitly lists API development, authentication, configuration, and testing.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodIt includes a directory layout and code examples for DTO validation, guards, exception filters, and tests.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodThere are no instructions to perform deletion or external transmission, and response guidelines exclude credentials.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackingNestJS and class-validator are used, but installation steps are not provided.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

NestJS Development Patterns

Production-grade NestJS patterns for modular TypeScript backends.

When to Activate

  • Building NestJS APIs or services
  • Structuring modules, controllers, and providers
  • Adding DTO validation, guards, interceptors, or exception filters
  • Configuring environment-aware settings and database integrations
  • Testing NestJS units or HTTP endpoints

Project Structure

src/
├── app.module.ts
├── main.ts
├── common/
│   ├── filters/
│   ├── guards/
│   ├── interceptors/
│   └── pipes/
├── config/
│   ├── configuration.ts
│   └── validation.ts
├── modules/
│   ├── auth/
│   │   ├── auth.controller.ts
│   │   ├── auth.module.ts
│   │   ├── auth.service.ts
│   │   ├── dto/
│   │   ├── guards/
│   │   └── strategies/
│   └── users/
│       ├── dto/
│       ├── entities/
│       ├── users.controller.ts
│       ├── users.module.ts
│       └── users.service.ts
└── prisma/ or database/
  • Keep domain code inside feature modules.
  • Put cross-cutting filters, decorators, guards, and interceptors in common/.
  • Keep DTOs close to the module that owns them.

Bootstrap and Global Validation

async function bootstrap() {
  const app = await NestFactory.create(AppModule, { bufferLogs: true });

  app.useGlobalPipes(
    new ValidationPipe({
      whitelist: true,
      forbidNonWhitelisted: true,
      transform: true,
      transformOptions: { enableImplicitConversion: true },
    }),
  );

  app.useGlobalInterceptors(new ClassSerializerInterceptor(app.get(Reflector)));
  app.useGlobalFilters(new HttpExceptionFilter());

  await app.listen(process.env.PORT ?? 3000);
}
bootstrap();
  • Always enable whitelist and forbidNonWhitelisted on public APIs.
  • Prefer one global validation pipe instead of repeating validation config per route.

Modules, Controllers, and Providers

@Module({
  controllers: [UsersController],
  providers: [UsersService],
  exports: [UsersService],
})
export class UsersModule {}

@Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
  constructor(private readonly usersService: UsersService) {}

  @Get(':id')
  getById(@Param('id', ParseUUIDPipe) id: string) {
    return this.usersService.getById(id);
  }

  @Post()
  create(@Body() dto: CreateUserDto) {
    return this.usersService.create(dto);
  }
}

@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
  constructor(private readonly usersRepo: UsersRepository) {}

  async create(dto: CreateUserDto) {
    return this.usersRepo.create(dto);
  }
}
  • Controllers should stay thin: parse HTTP input, call a provider, return response DTOs.
  • Put business logic in injectable services, not controllers.
  • Export only the providers other modules genuinely need.

DTOs and Validation

export class CreateUserDto {
  @IsEmail()
  email!: string;

  @IsString()
  @Length(2, 80)
  name!: string;

  @IsOptional()
  @IsEnum(UserRole)
  role?: UserRole;
}
  • Validate every request DTO with class-validator.
  • Use dedicated response DTOs or serializers instead of returning ORM entities directly.
  • Avoid leaking internal fields such as password hashes, tokens, or audit columns.

Auth, Guards, and Request Context

@UseGuards(JwtAuthGuard, RolesGuard)
@Roles('admin')
@Get('admin/report')
getAdminReport(@Req() req: AuthenticatedRequest) {
  return this.reportService.getForUser(req.user.id);
}
  • Keep auth strategies and guards module-local unless they are truly shared.
  • Encode coarse access rules in guards, then do resource-specific authorization in services.
  • Prefer explicit request types for authenticated request objects.

Exception Filters and Error Shape

@Catch()
export class HttpExceptionFilter implements ExceptionFilter {
  catch(exception: unknown, host: ArgumentsHost) {
    const response = host.switchToHttp().getResponse<Response>();
    const request = host.switchToHttp().getRequest<Request>();

    if (exception instanceof HttpException) {
      return response.status(exception.getStatus()).json({
        path: request.url,
        error: exception.getResponse(),
      });
    }

    return response.status(500).json({
      path: request.url,
      error: 'Internal server error',
    });
  }
}
  • Keep one consistent error envelope across the API.
  • Throw framework exceptions for expected client errors; log and wrap unexpected failures centrally.

Config and Environment Validation

ConfigModule.forRoot({
  isGlobal: true,
  load: [configuration],
  validate: validateEnv,
});
  • Validate env at boot, not lazily at first request.
  • Keep config access behind typed helpers or config services.
  • Split dev/staging/prod concerns in config factories instead of branching throughout feature code.

Persistence and Transactions

  • Keep repository / ORM code behind providers that speak domain language.
  • For Prisma or TypeORM, isolate transactional workflows in services that own the unit of work.
  • Do not let controllers coordinate multi-step writes directly.

Testing

describe('UsersController', () => {
  let app: INestApplication;

  beforeAll(async () => {
    const moduleRef = await Test.createTestingModule({
      imports: [UsersModule],
    }).compile();

    app = moduleRef.createNestApplication();
    app.useGlobalPipes(new ValidationPipe({ whitelist: true, transform: true }));
    await app.init();
  });
});
  • Unit test providers in isolation with mocked dependencies.
  • Add request-level tests for guards, validation pipes, and exception filters.
  • Reuse the same global pipes/filters in tests that you use in production.

Production Defaults

  • Enable structured logging and request correlation ids.
  • Terminate on invalid env/config instead of booting partially.
  • Prefer async provider initialization for DB/cache clients with explicit health checks.
  • Keep background jobs and event consumers in their own modules, not inside HTTP controllers.
  • Make rate limiting, auth, and audit logging explicit for public endpoints.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.6KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-architecture-audit

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.6KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.6KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.6KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.6KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.6KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill