Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

plan-canvas

Present local Markdown plans and HTML artifacts in a browser for review. People can annotate specific elements, chat, and approve or request changes, while the agent receives structured feedback and file edits appear automatically.

OriginalShow the original description

Open plans and HTML artifacts in a local browser canvas where the human annotates elements, chats, and approves or requests changes without leaving the page. Use when presenting a plan for review, or when feedback like "move this, change that" is easier pointed at than typed.

AI rating100/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing and approving an implementation plan
  • Pointing to specific changes in a design
  • Annotating a report or comparison
  • Reviewing revisions on the same browser page

Overview

What it does

Display local Markdown plans and HTML files in a browser for review through annotations and chat. Reviewers can select the elements or passages they want changed and send an approval or a request for changes. The agent receives that feedback as JSON and replies on the same page. Saving edits to the file updates the display, and diagrams written in Mermaid can also be reviewed.

When it helps

Use it to get approval for an implementation plan or discuss specific parts of a design, comparison document, or report. Comments such as “move this section” or “change this explanation” stay connected to their targets. Review can continue on the same page after revisions.

Example requests

  • “Open this plan in the browser to receive approval or requests for changes.”
  • “Make this HTML file available for review with annotations.”
  • “Revise the document based on the feedback and reply on the page.”

Notes

It uses ecc-plan-canvas, bundled with ecc-universal. It supports local .md and .html files; remote URLs, running web apps, and code diff reviews are outside its scope. Mermaid loads from a CDN. Offline, diagram source is displayed instead.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodIt explicitly identifies plan approval and document annotation as uses and lists excluded review types.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodIt provides open, await, reply, and end steps, with an example of the returned JSON.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodIt discloses the loopback server and CDN loading, and defines approval before implementation and conditions for reopening reviews.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
AGoodIt states there are no additional dependencies and shows how to invoke the CLI bundled with ecc-universal.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Plan Canvas

Review loop for plans and visual artifacts: you write the artifact, the human reviews it in the browser — annotating the exact element they mean, chatting, and delivering an Approve plan / Request changes verdict — while you block on a single CLI call that returns their feedback as JSON.

Inspired by lavish-axi; rebuilt ECC-native around the /plan confirmation gate, with zero dependencies.

When to Use

  • You just wrote a plan artifact (.claude/plans/*.plan.md from /plan) and need the CONFIRM/approve decision — the canvas verdict replaces a typed "yes/proceed".
  • The user should point at what to change: reviewing designs, comparisons, reports, or any local .md / .html artifact.
  • The user asks for /plan-canvas, a visual review, or "open it in the browser".

Do NOT use for: code review of diffs (/code-review), running web apps, or remote URLs. The canvas serves local artifact files only.

How It Works

Invoke the CLI as ecc-plan-canvas — the bin shipped by the ecc-universal package (on PATH after a global/plugin install; node "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/plan-canvas.js" also works for plugin installs). Run it from the project you are reviewing in; it works from any working directory. It manages a detached loopback server (127.0.0.1:4517) shared by all sessions, keyed by artifact path — no session ids to track.

The workflow is a plain CLI-plus-JSON loop, so it is model- and harness-agnostic: any agent that can run a shell command and read stdout drives it the same way (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, OpenCode, Copilot). Trigger it however your harness surfaces skills — e.g. /plan-canvas in Claude Code, $plan-canvas in Codex — or just run the ecc-plan-canvas commands directly.

# 1. Open the artifact in the user's browser (returns immediately)
ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/feature.plan.md

# 2. Block until the human responds. Leave running; re-run if interrupted:
#    queued feedback is never lost.
ecc-plan-canvas await .claude/plans/feature.plan.md

Stay listening, or the human talks to an empty chair

Feedback only reaches you while an await is actually parked on the session. If your turn ends with nothing listening, the message sits in the queue and, from the human's side of the glass, sending appears to do nothing at all.

So run await as a background task when your harness supports one (in Claude Code, a Bash call with run_in_background: true). It exits the moment feedback arrives and the harness hands you the JSON, which keeps the loop alive across turns instead of dying with the foreground call. A foreground await works too, but only until the harness time-limits it.

Two backstops exist, and neither is an excuse to skip the above:

  • ecc-plan-canvas pending lists feedback queued with no listener. Check it whenever you are unsure whether you missed something.
  • The stop:plan-canvas-pending hook blocks your turn from ending while canvas feedback is undelivered, and hands you the messages. If you are reading feedback from that hook, you stopped listening too early.

await prints JSON when the human acts:

{
  "status": "feedback",
  "items": [
    { "kind": "annotation", "text": "Split this into two phases",
      "anchor": { "selector": "h2:nth-of-type(3)", "tag": "h2", "snippet": "Phase 2: Migration" } },
    { "kind": "verdict", "verdict": "request-changes" }
  ]
}
  • kind: "chat" — freeform message; answer in the canvas, not the terminal.
  • kind: "annotation" — feedback anchored to an element (anchor.selector, anchor.snippet show what they pointed at; anchor.textRange.text when they highlighted a passage).
  • kind: "verdict" — approve means the plan is CONFIRMED: stop polling, end the session, and start implementing. request-changes means revise the artifact (the canvas live-reloads it) and keep the loop going.

3. Always respond in the canvas, then keep listening. One command does both:

ecc-plan-canvas await <file> --reply "Split Phase 2 as requested. Take a look."

Every human message gets a reply in the canvas, even a one-liner like "On it, rewriting the risk table now." Silence in the chat panel is indistinguishable from a broken canvas, which is exactly the failure this loop exists to prevent. Answer there, not only in the terminal.

While you work, keep the chat honest with the activity indicator:

# animated "agent is thinking..." bubble; refresh it during long work
ecc-plan-canvas typing <file> --state thinking
# switch to "agent is typing..." just before a reply lands
ecc-plan-canvas typing <file> --state typing

await sets thinking for you the moment it hands you a batch, and --reply clears it. Both states self-expire, so a crashed agent decays to an honest "queued" instead of leaving the human watching dots forever. Refresh thinking if a revision takes more than a minute.

4. End when review concludes: ecc-plan-canvas end <file>.

Diagrams (Mermaid)

When part of the plan is a flow, architecture, sequence, state machine, ER model, or dependency graph, author it as a fenced ```mermaid block instead of ASCII art or a wall of prose — the canvas renders it as a themed diagram the human can point at. Reach for it when a picture reads faster than a paragraph; skip it for simple lists or tables.

```mermaid
flowchart LR
  A[Market resolves] --> B{Watchers?}
  B -->|yes| C[Enqueue jobs] --> D[Fan-out worker]
```

Diagrams render in the ECC dark theme with the accent palette. Mermaid loads in the browser from a pinned CDN; if that is unavailable (offline), the block degrades to showing its source, so the review is never blocked. Point a local mirror at ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_MERMAID_URL for air-gapped use.

Rules

  • Markdown artifacts render in ECC's plan template (including Mermaid blocks); .html artifacts render as-is with the annotation layer injected. For HTML authoring guidance use the frontend-design-direction and artifact-design skills.
  • Edit the artifact file to revise — the canvas live-reloads on save. Never re-run open to refresh.
  • {"status": "ended", "endedBy": "user"} (or sessionEnded: true on a feedback batch) means the user closed the review: stop polling, deliver remaining updates in chat, and do not reopen. A plain open on that session is refused; pass --reopen only when the user asks to resume.
  • Sibling assets (images, CSS) must sit next to the artifact and be referenced by relative path.
  • The server is loopback-only and exits after 30 idle minutes (ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_IDLE_MS); stop shuts it down explicitly. State lives in ~/.claude/plan-canvas/ (ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_STATE_DIR).

Examples

Plan approval flow — /plan writes .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md and must WAIT for confirmation:

ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
ecc-plan-canvas await .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
# → {"status":"feedback","items":[{"kind":"verdict","verdict":"approve"}]}
ecc-plan-canvas end .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
# plan is confirmed — begin implementation

Revision loop — feedback arrives, you edit the file, reply, keep listening:

# await returned annotations → edit the .plan.md (canvas live-reloads)
ecc-plan-canvas await <file> --reply "Reworked the risk table."
# → blocks again until the next response

Anti-Patterns

  • Polling with --timeout-ms in a loop. It exists for tests. Leave the plain await running instead.
  • Ending your turn with no await listening while the review is still open. That is the one failure the human experiences as "I sent a message and nothing happened".
  • Reading the feedback but answering only in the terminal. The human is looking at the canvas.
  • Reopening after a user-initiated end "just to show" something.
  • Pasting the whole plan into chat and opening a canvas — pick the canvas and keep the terminal summary to one line.
  • Parsing the canvas chat from state files — everything you need arrives via await.

Design notes and origin: docs/design/plan-canvas.md.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill