Review prediction-market and trading-agent workflows before they handle account access, portfolio data, or trade planning. Produces structured findings on venue rules, data quality, security, privacy, and execution risks, with required safeguards and a safe next step.
Review prediction-market, basket, oracle, and trading-agent workflows for compliance, safety, data-quality, privacy, and execution risk. Use before any workflow handles venue auth, user portfolio data, API keys, or trade planning.
Run score Not tested
See how to installThis skill reviews risks in prediction markets, where people trade on event outcomes, and in trading-agent workflows. It checks trading-service terms, geographic restrictions, stale prices, liquidity, outcome resolution rules, API key handling, and how much personal portfolio data is stored. Results cover the reviewed scope, pass/warn/fail findings, actions to block, required mitigations, and a safe next step.
Use it before handling trading-service authentication or portfolio data, or before adding trade planning and automation. It also helps when public data and restricted-access data are mixed, or when checking whether informational output has crossed into trading recommendations.
Buy, sell, hold, and trade-size recommendations are outside its scope. Unclear legal questions are flagged for legal review. Trade execution requires a separate implementation plan and explicit user approval. The review also checks safeguards such as circuit breakers, spending limits, and dry runs.
This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.
AI checked the SKILL.md for operations that need care and for setup requirements. The score comes only from actually running the skill (hands-on test).
Not counted in the score. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Use this skill before a prediction-market workflow touches user financial context, venue authentication, portfolio data, automation, or execution-capable tools.
ITO_API_KEY and venue API keys out of logs and docs.Return:
If any execution-capable step is requested, require a separate implementation plan and explicit user approval.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.
Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.
Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.
Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.
Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.
Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.