Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

quarkus-verification

Verify Quarkus services before pull requests or deployment through builds, code analysis, tests, coverage reports, and security scans. The workflow also checks native executables, containers, performance, health endpoints, configuration, and documentation.

OriginalShow the original description

Verification loop for Quarkus projects: build, static analysis (Checkstyle, PMD, SpotBugs), tests with JaCoCo coverage, OWASP dependency and container security scans, GraalVM native compilation, health checks, and config validation. Use when verifying a Quarkus service before a PR, after major refactoring or dependency upgrades, or pre-deploy.

AI rating80/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Checking a Quarkus service before a pull request
  • Verifying refactoring or dependency upgrades
  • Checking native executable compatibility
  • Validating containers and settings before deployment

Overview

What it does

Follow a verification workflow after changing a Quarkus service or before deployment. It covers builds, static analysis that checks code without running it, tests, and vulnerability scans in sequence. JaCoCo checks how much code the tests cover. The workflow also addresses GraalVM native executable generation, load tests, health checks, container inspections, and reviews of configuration and documentation.

When it helps

Use it before opening a pull request, after major refactoring, or after updating dependencies to reduce missed checks. It also helps inspect configuration and startup behavior for the target environment before deploying to staging or production. Verification script and GitHub Actions examples are included.

Example requests

  • “Verify this Quarkus service before a pull request and summarize failed checks.”
  • “Check test coverage and vulnerabilities after the dependency update.”
  • “Check that the native executable and container start.”

Notes

Prepare Maven or Gradle and the tools required for the checks you choose. Native builds use GraalVM or a container environment. The SonarQube example assumes an already configured environment and references SONAR_TOKEN.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodIt explicitly defines use before pull requests, after dependency updates, and before deployment, with ten verification phases.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodIt provides commands such as mvn jacoco:check, coverage targets, and report locations.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
BPartly lackingIt includes sending SONAR_TOKEN and running load tests, but provides no confirmation procedure before execution.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackingIt uses Maven, GraalVM, k6, and other tools, but does not provide installation steps for them.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md10.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Quarkus Verification Loop

Run before PRs, after major changes, and pre-deploy.

When to Activate

  • Before opening a pull request for a Quarkus service
  • After major refactoring or dependency upgrades
  • Pre-deployment verification for staging or production
  • Running full build → lint → test → security scan → native compilation pipeline
  • Validating test coverage meets thresholds (80%+)
  • Testing native image compatibility

Phase 1: Build

# Maven
mvn clean verify -DskipTests

# Gradle
./gradlew clean assemble -x test

If build fails, stop and fix compilation errors.

Phase 2: Static Analysis

Checkstyle, PMD, SpotBugs (Maven)

mvn checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check

SonarQube (if configured)

mvn sonar:sonar \
  -Dsonar.projectKey=my-quarkus-project \
  -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 \
  -Dsonar.login=${SONAR_TOKEN}

Common Issues to Address

  • Unused imports or variables
  • Complex methods (high cyclomatic complexity)
  • Potential null pointer dereferences
  • Security issues flagged by SpotBugs

Phase 3: Tests + Coverage

# Run all tests
mvn clean test

# Generate coverage report
mvn jacoco:report

# Enforce coverage threshold (80%)
mvn jacoco:check

# Or with Gradle
./gradlew test jacocoTestReport jacocoTestCoverageVerification

Test Categories

Unit Tests

Test service logic with mocked dependencies:

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class UserServiceTest {
  @Mock UserRepository userRepository;
  @InjectMocks UserService userService;

  @Test
  void createUser_validInput_returnsUser() {
    var dto = new CreateUserDto("Alice", "alice@example.com");

    // Panache persist() is void — use doNothing + verify
    doNothing().when(userRepository).persist(any(User.class));

    User result = userService.create(dto);

    assertThat(result.name).isEqualTo("Alice");
    verify(userRepository).persist(any(User.class));
  }
}

Integration Tests

Test with real database (Testcontainers):

@QuarkusTest
@QuarkusTestResource(PostgresTestResource.class)
class UserRepositoryIntegrationTest {

  @Inject
  UserRepository userRepository;

  @Test
  @Transactional
  void findByEmail_existingUser_returnsUser() {
    User user = new User();
    user.name = "Alice";
    user.email = "alice@example.com";
    userRepository.persist(user);

    Optional<User> found = userRepository.findByEmail("alice@example.com");

    assertThat(found).isPresent();
    assertThat(found.get().name).isEqualTo("Alice");
  }
}

API Tests

Test REST endpoints with REST Assured:

@QuarkusTest
class UserResourceTest {

  @Test
  void createUser_validInput_returns201() {
    given()
        .contentType(ContentType.JSON)
        .body("""
            {"name": "Alice", "email": "alice@example.com"}
            """)
        .when().post("/api/users")
        .then()
        .statusCode(201)
        .body("name", equalTo("Alice"));
  }

  @Test
  void createUser_invalidEmail_returns400() {
    given()
        .contentType(ContentType.JSON)
        .body("""
            {"name": "Alice", "email": "invalid"}
            """)
        .when().post("/api/users")
        .then()
        .statusCode(400);
  }
}

Coverage Report

Check target/site/jacoco/index.html for detailed coverage:

  • Overall line coverage (target: 80%+)
  • Branch coverage (target: 70%+)
  • Identify uncovered critical paths

Phase 4: Security Scanning

Dependency Vulnerabilities (Maven)

mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check

Review target/dependency-check-report.html for CVEs.

Quarkus Security Audit

# Check vulnerable extensions
mvn quarkus:audit

# List all extensions
mvn quarkus:list-extensions

OWASP ZAP (API Security Testing)

docker run -t ghcr.io/zaproxy/zaproxy:stable zap-api-scan.py \
  -t http://localhost:8080/q/openapi \
  -f openapi

Common Security Checks

  • All secrets in environment variables (not in code)
  • Input validation on all endpoints
  • Authentication/authorization configured
  • CORS properly configured
  • Security headers set
  • Passwords hashed with BCrypt
  • SQL injection protection (parameterized queries)
  • Rate limiting on public endpoints

Phase 5: Native Compilation

Test GraalVM native image compatibility:

# Build native executable
mvn package -Dnative

# Or with container
mvn package -Dnative -Dquarkus.native.container-build=true

# Test native executable
./target/*-runner

# Run basic smoke tests
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/live
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/ready

Native Image Troubleshooting

Common issues:

  • Reflection: Add reflection config for dynamic classes
  • Resources: Include resources with quarkus.native.resources.includes
  • JNI: Register JNI classes if using native libraries

Example reflection config:

@RegisterForReflection(targets = {MyDynamicClass.class})
public class ReflectionConfiguration {}

Phase 6: Performance Testing

Load Testing with K6

// load-test.js
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check } from 'k6';

export const options = {
  stages: [
    { duration: '30s', target: 50 },
    { duration: '1m', target: 100 },
    { duration: '30s', target: 0 },
  ],
};

export default function () {
  const res = http.get('http://localhost:8080/api/markets');
  check(res, {
    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
    'response time < 200ms': (r) => r.timings.duration < 200,
  });
}

Run:

k6 run load-test.js

Metrics to Monitor

  • Response time (p50, p95, p99)
  • Throughput (requests/sec)
  • Error rate
  • Memory usage
  • CPU usage

Phase 7: Health Checks

# Liveness
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/live

# Readiness
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health/ready

# All health checks
curl http://localhost:8080/q/health

# Metrics (if enabled)
curl http://localhost:8080/q/metrics

Expected responses:

{
  "status": "UP",
  "checks": [
    {
      "name": "Database connection",
      "status": "UP"
    }
  ]
}

Phase 8: Container Image Build

# Build container image
mvn package -Dquarkus.container-image.build=true

# Or with specific registry
mvn package \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.build=true \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.registry=docker.io \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.group=myorg \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.tag=1.0.0

# Test container
docker run -p 8080:8080 myorg/my-quarkus-app:1.0.0

Container Security Scan

# Trivy
trivy image myorg/my-quarkus-app:1.0.0

# Grype
grype myorg/my-quarkus-app:1.0.0

Phase 9: Configuration Validation

# Check all configuration properties
mvn quarkus:info

# List all config sources
curl http://localhost:8080/q/dev/io.quarkus.quarkus-vertx-http/config

Environment-Specific Checks

  • Database URLs configured per environment
  • Secrets externalized (Vault, env vars)
  • Logging levels appropriate
  • CORS origins set correctly
  • Rate limiting configured
  • Monitoring/tracing enabled

Phase 10: Documentation Review

  • OpenAPI/Swagger docs up to date (/q/swagger-ui)
  • README has setup instructions
  • API changes documented
  • Migration guide for breaking changes
  • Configuration properties documented

Generate OpenAPI spec:

curl http://localhost:8080/q/openapi -o openapi.json

Verification Checklist

Code Quality

  • Build passes without warnings
  • Static analysis clean (no high/medium issues)
  • Code follows team conventions
  • No commented-out code or TODOs in PR

Testing

  • All tests pass
  • Code coverage ≥ 80%
  • Integration tests with real database
  • Security tests pass
  • Performance within acceptable limits

Security

  • No dependency vulnerabilities
  • Authentication/authorization tested
  • Input validation complete
  • Secrets not in source code
  • Security headers configured

Deployment

  • Native compilation successful
  • Container image builds
  • Health checks respond correctly
  • Configuration valid for target environment

Native Image

  • Native executable builds
  • Native tests pass
  • Startup time < 100ms
  • Memory footprint acceptable

Automated Verification Script

#!/bin/bash
set -e

echo "=== Phase 1: Build ==="
mvn clean verify -DskipTests

echo "=== Phase 2: Static Analysis ==="
mvn checkstyle:check pmd:check spotbugs:check

echo "=== Phase 3: Tests + Coverage ==="
mvn test jacoco:report jacoco:check

echo "=== Phase 4: Security Scan ==="
mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check

echo "=== Phase 5: Native Compilation ==="
mvn package -Dnative -Dquarkus.native.container-build=true

echo "=== All Phases Complete ==="
echo "Review reports:"
echo "  - Coverage: target/site/jacoco/index.html"
echo "  - Security: target/dependency-check-report.html"
echo "  - Native: target/*-runner"

CI/CD Integration

GitHub Actions Example

name: Verification

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  verify:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v7

      - name: Set up JDK 21
        uses: actions/setup-java@v5
        with:
          java-version: '21'
          distribution: 'temurin'

      - name: Cache Maven packages
        uses: actions/cache@v6
        with:
          path: ~/.m2
          key: ${{ runner.os }}-m2-${{ hashFiles('**/pom.xml') }}

      - name: Build
        run: mvn clean verify -DskipTests

      - name: Test with Coverage
        run: mvn test jacoco:report jacoco:check

      - name: Security Scan
        run: mvn org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:check

      - name: Upload Coverage
        uses: codecov/codecov-action@v7
        with:
          token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
          files: target/site/jacoco/jacoco.xml

Best Practices

  • Run verification loop before every PR
  • Automate in CI/CD pipeline
  • Fix issues immediately; don't accumulate debt
  • Keep coverage above 80%
  • Update dependencies regularly
  • Test native compilation periodically
  • Monitor performance trends
  • Document breaking changes
  • Review security scan results
  • Validate configuration for each environment

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.8KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-architecture-audit

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.8KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.8KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-harness-construction

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.8KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.8KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.8KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill