Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

rails-patterns

Build or review Ruby on Rails applications by separating business operations, forms, and database queries into focused objects. Covers efficient data loading, background jobs, reusable view components, Hotwire interactions, and Rails 8 database-backed services.

OriginalShow the original description

Ruby on Rails framework patterns for Rails 7.1+ and 8.x apps. Covers the directory contract, skinny controllers with service objects, form objects, query objects, idiomatic ActiveRecord, background jobs, ViewComponent, Hotwire, and the Rails 8 Solid stack. Use when building or reviewing Rails apps, controllers, models, services, jobs, or views.

Works withRedis
AI rating80/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Moving business logic out of large controllers
  • Designing forms that update multiple models
  • Reviewing repeated database queries and data loading
  • Designing background jobs and reusable view components

Overview

What it does

rails-patterns helps organize where processing belongs and how responsibilities are divided when implementing or reviewing Ruby on Rails applications. Its examples separate business operations into service objects, input spanning multiple models into form objects, and reusable searches into query objects. It also covers ActiveRecord data loading, background jobs, interface components with ViewComponent, and partial page updates with Hotwire.

When it helps

Use it when controllers or models have grown large, similar data loading is repeated across screens, or complex forms need a clearer structure. It also serves as a reference for designing jobs so retries do not duplicate notifications or external operations. You can consult it when considering Rails 8 configurations using Solid Queue, Solid Cache, and Solid Cable.

Example requests

  • “Move this controller’s business operations into service objects.”
  • “Organize this registration form, which updates multiple models, using form objects.”
  • “Review associated data loading and what happens when jobs are retried.”

Notes

The material targets Rails 7.1 and later, including 8.x. Job examples also address duplicate prevention on the external API side so retries do not duplicate results. When adding a counter cache to store counts in a table with existing data, backfilling historical data is outside the examples’ scope.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodIt states Rails implementation and review uses and identifies triggers such as growing controllers.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodIt provides directory locations, service calling conventions, return structures, and transaction code examples.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
BPartly lackingExamples save records and dispatch notifications; transactions are shown, but confirmation before sending is not specified.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
BPartly lackingSupported Rails versions and related tools are named, but installation steps for tools such as ViewComponent are absent.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md16.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Rails Patterns

Framework patterns for modern Ruby on Rails applications (Rails 7.1+ and 8.x). Rails is opinionated by design; these are the patterns the community has converged on for apps that stay maintainable past the 50-model mark. This skill is the "how." For the "what" and "when" (the decisions about which pattern to reach for), see the Ruby patterns rules — rules/ruby/patterns.md in this repository, installed as rules/ecc/ruby/patterns.md.

When to Activate

  • Building a Rails application (full-stack, API-only, or hybrid)
  • Reviewing a PR that touches app/ or config/
  • Generating models, controllers, services, or jobs
  • A controller action grows past ~10 lines
  • A model file grows past ~200 lines
  • ActiveRecord queries start appearing in controllers or views

Core Concepts

The directory contract

Rails apps follow a predictable structure. Add directories deliberately, not casually.

app/
  models/         ActiveRecord models. Persistence and domain logic close to the data.
  controllers/    HTTP request handling. Thin orchestration only.
  views/          ERB templates. No business logic.
  components/     ViewComponent classes. View logic that needs tests.
  services/       Service objects. Multi-step business operations.
  forms/          Form objects. Complex form handling across multiple models.
  queries/        Query objects. Reusable, composable ActiveRecord queries.
  jobs/           Background jobs. Async work via Solid Queue, Sidekiq, or GoodJob.
  mailers/        ActionMailer classes.
  helpers/        View helpers. Tiny presentational logic only.
  policies/       Authorization policies (if using Pundit). Optional.
  channels/       ActionCable channels for WebSocket work.

Avoid app/lib/, app/utils/, app/managers/. If something does not fit the directories above, the design usually needs rethinking, not a new directory. Truly generic code goes in lib/.

Skinny controllers

Controllers receive a request, delegate to the right object, and render a response. Business logic lives elsewhere. (Per the Ruby patterns rules, extract to a service object when the controller starts carrying multiple responsibilities.)

Service objects

The default for business operations that touch more than a single model save. Conventions that keep them consistent:

  • Namespace by domain (Invoices::Create), not by suffix (InvoiceCreator).
  • A class method .call delegates to an instance #call.
  • Return a Result object, not a boolean or a bare record, so the caller can branch on success, errors, and the affected record.
  • Wrap multi-record writes in a transaction.
  • Keep each service single-purpose (Invoices::Create, Invoices::MarkPaid), never Invoices::Manager.

Form objects

When a form spans multiple models or has fields that do not map to columns, use a form object rather than nested attributes or virtual attributes on the wrong model. It quacks like a model to the view (form_with model: @form) while composing records cleanly.

Query objects

For ActiveRecord queries reused across controllers or services, or too complex for a scope, extract a query object that accepts a scope as input so it composes. Rule of thumb: a scope that grows past three chained conditions or starts taking parameters wants to be a query object.

Background jobs

Offload anything slow. (Per the Ruby patterns rules, Solid Queue for greenfield Rails 8 with modest throughput; Sidekiq when you need mature observability, high throughput, or existing Redis.) Regardless of adapter: pass IDs not records, make perform idempotent, and set retry_on/discard_on explicitly.

ViewComponent over partials

For view logic with conditional rendering, more than two arguments, or reuse across more than three places, prefer a ViewComponent. Components are testable in isolation and surface their interface explicitly; partials with deep conditional logic become debt.

Hotwire: Turbo and Stimulus

The default Rails frontend stack. (Per the Ruby patterns rules, prefer Hotwire for server-rendered apps; reach for React/Vue only when interaction complexity justifies the client surface.) Turbo Frames for partial page updates, Turbo Streams for server-driven updates, Stimulus for small client-side behaviors next to the markup.

The Rails 8 Solid stack

Rails 8 ships database-backed defaults that previously needed Redis: Solid Queue (jobs), Solid Cache (cache), Solid Cable (ActionCable). The tradeoff is more database load for one fewer infrastructure component; a good fit for modest throughput, with Redis still winning at high scale. Kamal is the default Docker-based deploy tool.

Code Examples

Skinny controller with a service object

# Bad: business logic in the controller
class InvoicesController < ApplicationController
  def create
    @invoice = Invoice.new(invoice_params)
    @invoice.user = current_user
    @invoice.line_items.build(invoice_params[:line_items])
    @invoice.tax_total = TaxCalculator.new(@invoice).calculate
    @invoice.total = @invoice.line_items.sum(&:amount) + @invoice.tax_total

    if @invoice.save
      InvoiceMailer.created(@invoice).deliver_later
      AccountingExportJob.perform_later(@invoice.id)
      redirect_to @invoice, notice: "Invoice created"
    else
      render :new
    end
  end
end

# Good: controller orchestrates, service does the work
class InvoicesController < ApplicationController
  def create
    result = Invoices::Create.call(params: invoice_params, user: current_user)

    if result.success?
      redirect_to result.invoice, notice: "Invoice created"
    else
      @invoice = result.invoice
      render :new, status: :unprocessable_entity
    end
  end
end

The service object

# app/services/invoices/create.rb
module Invoices
  class Create
    # Struct keeps this runnable on every Ruby that Rails 7.1 supports.
    # On Ruby 3.2+, `Data.define(:success?, :invoice, :errors)` is a more
    # concise immutable alternative.
    Result = Struct.new(:success, :invoice, :errors, keyword_init: true) do
      def success?
        success
      end
    end

    def self.call(params:, user:)
      new(params: params, user: user).call
    end

    def initialize(params:, user:)
      @params = params
      @user = user
    end

    def call
      invoice = build_invoice
      ApplicationRecord.transaction do
        invoice.save!
      end
      begin
        send_notifications(invoice)
      rescue StandardError => e
        Rails.logger.error("Notification dispatch failed for invoice #{invoice.id}: #{e.message}")
      end
      Result.new(success: true, invoice: invoice, errors: nil)
    rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid => e
      Result.new(success: false, invoice: e.record, errors: e.record.errors)
    end

    private

    attr_reader :params, :user

    def build_invoice
      invoice = user.invoices.new(params.except(:line_items))
      invoice.line_items.build(params[:line_items])
      invoice.tax_total = TaxCalculator.call(invoice)
      invoice.total = invoice.line_items.sum(&:amount) + invoice.tax_total
      invoice
    end

    def send_notifications(invoice)
      InvoiceMailer.created(invoice).deliver_later
      AccountingExportJob.perform_later(invoice.id)
    end
  end
end

Form object

# app/forms/signup_form.rb
class SignupForm
  include ActiveModel::Model
  include ActiveModel::Attributes

  attribute :email, :string
  attribute :password, :string
  attribute :company_name, :string
  attribute :terms_accepted, :boolean

  validates :email, presence: true, format: URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP
  validates :password, presence: true, length: { minimum: 12 }
  validates :company_name, presence: true
  validates :terms_accepted, acceptance: true

  attr_reader :user, :company

  def save
    return false unless valid?

    ApplicationRecord.transaction do
      @company = Company.create!(name: company_name)
      @user = @company.users.create!(email: email, password: password, role: :owner)
    end
    true
  rescue ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid => e
    errors.merge!(e.record.errors)
    false
  end
end

Query object

# app/queries/invoices/overdue.rb
module Invoices
  class Overdue
    def self.call(scope: Invoice.all, as_of: Time.current)
      new(scope: scope, as_of: as_of).call
    end

    def initialize(scope:, as_of:)
      @scope = scope
      @as_of = as_of
    end

    def call
      scope
        .where(status: :sent)
        .where(due_date: ..as_of)
        .where.not(id: paid_invoice_ids)
        .includes(:customer, :line_items)
    end

    private

    attr_reader :scope, :as_of

    def paid_invoice_ids
      Payment.where(created_at: ..as_of).pluck(:invoice_id)
    end
  end
end

Query objects accept a scope, so they compose: Invoices::Overdue.call(scope: current_user.invoices).

N+1 prevention

# Bad: N+1 in the view when it calls post.author.name
@posts = Post.published

# Good: eager load
@posts = Post.published.includes(:author)

includes lets Rails choose preload vs eager_load. Force preload for separate queries, eager_load for a JOIN when filtering on the association. Since Rails 6.1, strict_loading raises on accidental lazy loads.

Counter cache

class Comment < ApplicationRecord
  belongs_to :post, counter_cache: true
end
add_column :posts, :comments_count, :integer, default: 0, null: false

post.comments_count becomes a column read instead of a COUNT(*). This example assumes a new table; adding a counter cache to a table that already has rows requires a backfill, which is out of scope here.

Background job shape

Pass record IDs, not records. Retries make delivery at-least-once, so any job that calls an external service must be idempotent — otherwise a transient failure after the remote call succeeds will duplicate the effect on the next attempt.

class AccountingExportJob < ApplicationJob
  queue_as :exports

  retry_on AccountingApi::TransientError, wait: :polynomially_longer, attempts: 5
  discard_on AccountingApi::PermanentError

  def perform(invoice_id)
    invoice = Invoice.find(invoice_id)
    export = AccountingExport.create_or_find_by!(
      invoice: invoice,
      idempotency_key: "invoice-export-#{invoice.id}-#{invoice.updated_at.to_i}"
    )
    return if export.completed_at?

    receipt = AccountingApi.export(invoice, idempotency_key: export.idempotency_key)
    export.update!(completed_at: Time.current, external_id: receipt.id)
  end
end
add_index :accounting_exports, :idempotency_key, unique: true

The unique index is what makes this safe: when two attempts race, the database rejects the second insert and Active Record resolves the conflict inside the call, returning the existing row. That happens without any job-level retry — retry_on above covers only AccountingApi::TransientError. The guard covers the window before the remote call; passing idempotency_key through to the API covers the window after it, so a crash between the API call and update! still resolves to a single export.

ViewComponent

# app/components/invoice_status_badge_component.rb
class InvoiceStatusBadgeComponent < ViewComponent::Base
  STATUS_CLASSES = {
    draft: "bg-gray-100 text-gray-800",
    sent: "bg-blue-100 text-blue-800",
    paid: "bg-green-100 text-green-800",
    overdue: "bg-red-100 text-red-800"
  }.freeze

  def initialize(invoice:)
    @invoice = invoice
  end

  def call
    tag.span(@invoice.status.humanize, class: "rounded-full px-2 py-1 text-sm #{status_class}")
  end

  private

  def status_class
    STATUS_CLASSES.fetch(@invoice.status.to_sym, "bg-gray-100")
  end
end
<%= render InvoiceStatusBadgeComponent.new(invoice: @invoice) %>

Hotwire

<%# Turbo Frame: clicking Edit replaces only this frame %>
<%= turbo_frame_tag "invoice_#{@invoice.id}" do %>
  <div class="invoice">
    <%= link_to "Edit", edit_invoice_path(@invoice) %>
  </div>
<% end %>
<%# Turbo Stream: app/views/comments/create.turbo_stream.erb %>
<%= turbo_stream.append "comments", @comment %>
<%= turbo_stream.update "comment_form", partial: "form", locals: { comment: Comment.new } %>
// app/javascript/controllers/copy_to_clipboard_controller.js
import { Controller } from "@hotwired/stimulus"

export default class extends Controller {
  static targets = ["source"]

  copy() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.sourceTarget.value)
  }
}

Acceptable vs unacceptable callbacks

# Acceptable: pure data normalization
class User < ApplicationRecord
  before_validation :normalize_email

  private

  def normalize_email
    self.email = email.to_s.downcase.strip
  end
end

# Move to a service instead: side effects hidden in a callback
# class User < ApplicationRecord
#   after_create :send_welcome_email  # hard to opt out of, hard to test
# end

Good concern vs bad concern

# Good: genuinely cross-cutting, reusable across unrelated models
# app/models/concerns/soft_deletable.rb
module SoftDeletable
  extend ActiveSupport::Concern

  included do
    scope :active, -> { where(deleted_at: nil) }
    scope :deleted, -> { where.not(deleted_at: nil) }
  end

  def soft_delete! = update!(deleted_at: Time.current)
  def restore! = update!(deleted_at: nil)
end

# Bad: a "concern" used by exactly one model, holding logic that belongs on it
# app/models/concerns/invoice_calculations.rb
module InvoiceCalculations
  extend ActiveSupport::Concern

  def calculate_total
    line_items.sum(&:amount) + tax_total
  end
end
# Only Invoice includes this. It isn't cross-cutting; it's Invoice's own logic
# hidden in a module for the appearance of a "skinny" model. Put it back on Invoice.

A concern used by only one class is just moving code; it belongs in that class. A concern should be reusable across at least two unrelated models.

Anti-Patterns

God controllers

Any controller past ~80 lines is doing too much. Split actions across controllers or extract to services.

Fat models with 30+ methods

Models should know about their own data. Methods that orchestrate other models, send notifications, or coordinate workflows belong in services.

Callback chains

after_save :update_cache, :send_notifications, :enqueue_export is the start of a debugging nightmare. Move them into a service that runs them explicitly.

Nested attributes for complex forms

accepts_nested_attributes_for is fine for simple cases. For conditional validation or cross-model logic, use a form object.

Default scopes on critical models

default_scope { where(deleted: false) } silently excludes records from every query in the app, including the ones you need for support and debugging. Prefer an explicit named scope.

Models named after database concepts

UserRole, OrderStatus, InvoiceState are usually enum candidates, not models.

Reaching for a JS framework before Hotwire

If the page is server-rendered with occasional interactivity, Hotwire ships faster. Reserve React/Vue for genuinely SPA-shaped apps.

Best Practices

  • Keep controllers thin; push business logic into services.
  • Return Result objects from services so callers branch on outcome, not exceptions.
  • Wrap multi-record writes in a transaction; let notification/side-effect failures log without breaking the primary write.
  • Pass IDs to jobs, keep perform idempotent, set retry/discard explicitly.
  • Default to eager loading; treat an accidental N+1 as a bug, not a nuisance.
  • Reserve concerns for behavior shared across at least two unrelated models.
  • Reach for Hotwire before a client-side framework on server-rendered apps.

Related Skills

  • backend-patterns — service boundaries and adapter patterns (referenced by the Ruby patterns rules)
  • Ruby patterns rules (rules/ruby/patterns.md, installed as rules/ecc/ruby/patterns.md) — the decisions and when-to-use guidance this skill implements

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-architecture-audit

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill