Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

react-patterns

Build and review React 18/19 components with guidance on state management, data fetching, forms, loading states, and error handling. It also covers keyboard access and how to divide components between server and browser execution.

OriginalShow the original description

React 18/19 patterns including hooks discipline, server/client component boundaries, Suspense + error boundaries, form actions, data fetching, state management decision trees, and accessibility-first composition. Use when writing or reviewing React components.

See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing React components
  • Choosing where shared state belongs
  • Designing forms and data fetching
  • Checking keyboard access

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md11.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

React Patterns

Idiomatic React 18/19 patterns for building robust, accessible, performant component trees.

When to Activate

  • Writing or modifying React function components, custom hooks, or component trees
  • Reviewing JSX/TSX files
  • Designing state shape or component composition
  • Migrating class components or older forwardRef/useEffect-heavy code
  • Choosing between local state, lifted state, context, and external stores
  • Working with Server Components / Client Components (Next.js App Router, RSC)
  • Implementing forms with React 19 actions or controlled inputs
  • Wiring data fetching with TanStack Query / SWR / RSC

Core Principles

1. Render is a Pure Function of Props and State

// Good: derive during render
function Cart({ items }: { items: CartItem[] }) {
  const total = items.reduce((sum, i) => sum + i.price * i.qty, 0);
  return <span>{formatMoney(total)}</span>;
}

// Bad: derived state stored separately
function Cart({ items }: { items: CartItem[] }) {
  const [total, setTotal] = useState(0);
  useEffect(() => {
    setTotal(items.reduce((sum, i) => sum + i.price * i.qty, 0));
  }, [items]);
  return <span>{formatMoney(total)}</span>;
}

Derived state in useEffect adds a render cycle, can desync, and obscures the data flow.

2. Side Effects Outside Render

Effects, mutations, network calls, and subscriptions live in event handlers or useEffect — never in the render body.

3. Composition Over Inheritance

React has no inheritance model for components. Compose with children, render props, or component props.

Hooks Discipline

See rules/react/hooks.md for the full ruleset. Highlights:

  • Top-level only, never conditional
  • Cleanup every subscription, interval, listener
  • Functional updater (setX(prev => prev + 1)) when new state depends on old
  • Default position: do not memoize — add useMemo/useCallback only when a profiler or a dependency chain proves it matters
  • Extract a custom hook only when the same hook sequence appears in 2+ components

State Location Decision Tree

Used by one component?
  -> useState inside it

Used by parent + a few descendants?
  -> lift to nearest common ancestor

Used across distant branches AND low-frequency reads (theme, auth, locale)?
  -> React Context

High-frequency updates shared across the tree?
  -> external store (Zustand, Jotai, Redux Toolkit)

Derived from a server?
  -> server-state library (TanStack Query, SWR, RSC fetch)

Most pages do not need context or a global store. Resist abstraction until duplicated lifting becomes painful.

Server / Client Components (RSC)

// Server Component - default, async, never ships JS for itself
export default async function ProductPage({ params }: { params: { id: string } }) {
  const product = await db.product.findUnique({ where: { id: params.id } });
  if (!product) notFound();
  return <ProductView product={product} />;
}

// Client Component - opt in with "use client"
"use client";
export function AddToCartButton({ productId }: { productId: string }) {
  const [pending, startTransition] = useTransition();
  return (
    <button
      disabled={pending}
      onClick={() => startTransition(() => addToCart(productId))}
    >
      {pending ? "Adding..." : "Add to cart"}
    </button>
  );
}

Boundaries:

  • Server -> Client: pass serializable props or children
  • Client -> Server: invoke Server Actions via <form action={...}> or imperatively from event handlers
  • Never import a Server Component from a Client Component file — compose them via children instead

Suspense + Error Boundaries

<ErrorBoundary fallback={<ErrorView />}>
  <Suspense fallback={<UserSkeleton />}>
    <UserDetail id={id} />
  </Suspense>
</ErrorBoundary>
  • Place Suspense boundaries close to the data, not at the route root — progressively reveal content
  • Error Boundary remains a class API; use react-error-boundary for a hook-friendly wrapper
  • A boundary catches errors thrown during render, lifecycle, and constructors of its children — NOT in event handlers or async code

Forms

React 19 form actions (preferred for new code)

"use client";
import { useActionState } from "react";

const initial = { error: null as string | null };

async function updateUserAction(_prev: typeof initial, formData: FormData) {
  "use server";
  const parsed = UserSchema.safeParse(Object.fromEntries(formData));
  if (!parsed.success) return { error: "Invalid input" };
  await db.user.update({ where: { id: parsed.data.id }, data: parsed.data });
  return { error: null };
}

export function UserForm() {
  const [state, formAction, pending] = useActionState(updateUserAction, initial);
  return (
    <form action={formAction}>
      <input name="name" required />
      <button type="submit" disabled={pending}>Save</button>
      {state.error && <p role="alert">{state.error}</p>}
    </form>
  );
}

Controlled inputs

Use controlled when the value drives other UI, formats on every keystroke, or implements real-time validation.

Complex forms

For multi-step forms, dynamic field arrays, or cross-field validation: use a library (React Hook Form, TanStack Form). Roll-your-own state management for forms past trivial complexity is a maintenance trap.

Data Fetching Decision Matrix

NeedTool
Per-request data in Next.js App RouterRSC await fetch()
Client-side cache + mutations + invalidationTanStack Query
Lightweight client cache + revalidationSWR
Real-time subscriptionsServer-Sent Events, WebSockets, or the lib's subscription API
One-off fire-and-forgetfetch() in an event handler

Avoid useEffect + fetch for application data — race conditions, no cache, no retry, no Suspense integration.

Composition Recipes

Slot via children

<Layout>
  <Header />
  <Main>{content}</Main>
</Layout>

Named slots

<Page header={<Nav />} sidebar={<Filters />}>
  <Results />
</Page>

Compound components (shared state via Context)

<Tabs defaultValue="profile">
  <Tabs.List>
    <Tabs.Trigger value="profile">Profile</Tabs.Trigger>
    <Tabs.Trigger value="settings">Settings</Tabs.Trigger>
  </Tabs.List>
  <Tabs.Panel value="profile"><Profile /></Tabs.Panel>
  <Tabs.Panel value="settings"><Settings /></Tabs.Panel>
</Tabs>

Render prop / function-as-child

Useful when the parent needs to pass parameters to the rendered output:

<DataLoader id={id}>
  {({ data, isLoading }) => isLoading ? <Spinner /> : <UserCard user={data} />}
</DataLoader>

Modern alternative: a hook (useData(id)) returning the same shape — usually cleaner.

Performance

When React.memo Actually Helps

Wrap a component in React.memo only when:

  1. It re-renders frequently
  2. Its props are usually the same between renders
  3. Its render is measurably expensive

React.memo adds an equality check on every render. If props differ on most renders, the check is pure overhead.

Avoiding Render Cascades

  • Lift state down rather than up where possible
  • Split context: one context per concern, so a change to themeContext does not re-render auth consumers
  • Use useSyncExternalStore for external state libraries — required for safe concurrent rendering

Lists

  • Provide stable key props (database id, not array index)
  • Virtualize long lists with @tanstack/react-virtual or react-window once visible item count exceeds ~50 with non-trivial rows

Accessibility-First Composition

  • Always render semantic HTML (<button>, <a>, <nav>, <main>) before reaching for role attributes
  • Every interactive element must be reachable by keyboard
  • Form inputs need labels — <label htmlFor> or aria-label if visually labeled by an icon
  • Manage focus on route changes and modal open/close
  • Run axe in component tests (see skills/react-testing)
  • Cross-link: skills/accessibility/SKILL.md covers WCAG criteria and pattern libraries

Routing

This skill is router-agnostic. The patterns above work with React Router, TanStack Router, Next.js App Router, Remix Router. Router-specific patterns (loaders, actions, nested layouts) follow the router's documentation — those are framework concerns layered on top of React core.

Out of Scope (Pointer Sections)

  • Next.js specifics: App Router data loading, Route Handlers, Middleware, Parallel Routes — separate concern, use Next.js docs
  • React Native: Platform-specific patterns differ enough to warrant a separate react-native-patterns skill (not present yet)
  • Remix: Loader/action conventions overlap with RSC but follow Remix docs

Related

  • Rules: rules/react/ — coding-style, hooks, patterns, security, testing
  • Skills: react-performance for the Vercel-derived performance ruleset, frontend-patterns for cross-framework UI concerns, accessibility, angular-developer for framework comparison
  • Agents: react-reviewer for code review, react-build-resolver for build/bundler errors
  • Commands: /react-review, /react-build, /react-test

Examples

Custom hook for debounced search

function useDebounce<T>(value: T, delay = 300): T {
  const [debounced, setDebounced] = useState(value);
  useEffect(() => {
    const id = setTimeout(() => setDebounced(value), delay);
    return () => clearTimeout(id);
  }, [value, delay]);
  return debounced;
}

function SearchBox() {
  const [query, setQuery] = useState("");
  const debounced = useDebounce(query, 300);
  const { data } = useQuery({
    queryKey: ["search", debounced],
    queryFn: () => searchApi(debounced),
    enabled: debounced.length > 0,
  });
  return (
    <>
      <input value={query} onChange={(e) => setQuery(e.target.value)} />
      <Results items={data ?? []} />
    </>
  );
}

Optimistic UI with React 19 useOptimistic

"use client";
import { useOptimistic } from "react";

export function MessageList({ messages }: { messages: Message[] }) {
  const [optimistic, addOptimistic] = useOptimistic(
    messages,
    (state, newMessage: Message) => [...state, newMessage],
  );

  async function send(formData: FormData) {
    const text = String(formData.get("text"));
    addOptimistic({ id: "pending", text, sender: "me" });
    await saveMessage(text);
  }

  return (
    <>
      <ul>{optimistic.map((m) => <li key={m.id}>{m.text}</li>)}</ul>
      <form action={send}>
        <input name="text" />
        <button type="submit">Send</button>
      </form>
    </>
  );
}

Splitting context to avoid render cascades

// Two contexts: one rarely changes, one frequently
const ThemeContext = createContext<Theme>("light");
const NotificationsContext = createContext<Notification[]>([]);

// A component that only consumes ThemeContext does NOT re-render when notifications change

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummary

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill