Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHubEnglish overview

repo-scan

Prepare to audit a codebase spanning several technologies by installing the external repo-scan skill from a fixed, reviewable commit. This entry provides the installation procedure; the code audit requires invoking the installed skill separately.

OriginalShow the original description

Bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan skill from a pinned, reviewable commit. Use when repo-scan must be installed before running its cross-stack source-code asset audit; this ECC pointer does not perform the audit itself.

AI rating100/ 100See how to install

Good for

  • Installing the audit skill before reviewing a legacy codebase
  • Preparing an audit before a major refactor
  • Preparing to inspect third-party code bundled in source
  • Installing the audit skill for monorepo reorganization

Overview

What it does

This skill guides you through installing the external repo-scan skill from a pinned commit to prepare for a code asset audit. The procedure includes reviewing the downloaded source before installation, backing up an existing installation, and restoring it if replacement fails. Its responsibility ends at installation; it does not audit your code.

When it helps

Use it when taking over a large existing codebase or preparing to separate your own code, third-party code, and build artifacts before major changes. The external skill describes classification across C/C++, Android, iOS, and Web, detection of bundled libraries, module assessment, and HTML report creation.

Example requests

  • “Review the source at the pinned commit and install repo-scan so I can prepare to audit this codebase.”
  • “Walk me through installing the external audit skill before a major refactor.”

Notes

Installation uses Git, a shell, and network access to download source. The default destination is inside Claude’s configuration directory. After reviewing the source, type install to approve replacement. Once installation finishes, reload your agent environment and invoke repo-scan again.

This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.

Objective evaluation

AI rated this skill on four points using only the contents of its SKILL.md. Stars and popularity are not taken into account.

Clear instructionsIs it clear when to use it and what it does?
AGoodThe description explicitly identifies installation from a pinned commit as its purpose and states that it does not perform an audit.
Concrete stepsAre steps, inputs, outputs, and examples spelled out?
AGoodThe shell procedure specifies downloading, review, backup, replacement, restoration, and the installation destination.
SafetyAre sending data, deleting files, and running commands disclosed?
AGoodReplacement requires source review and typing install; the procedure includes backup and restoration after failure.
Easy setupDoes it need few tools or API keys, and are they documented?
AGoodInstallation instructions specify the pinned commit, source repository, destination, and required reload after installation.

The total counts each point as A = 25, B = 15, C = 5. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 19, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.

Disagree? Request a re-evaluation

Tell us which point is wrong and why. No login needed. We will check it against the SKILL.md, redo the evaluation, and show the result here.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

repo-scan

Every ecosystem has its own dependency manager, but no tool looks across C++, Android, iOS, and Web to tell you: how much code is actually yours, what's third-party, and what's dead weight.

When to Use

  • Taking over a large legacy codebase and need a structural overview
  • Before major refactoring — identify what's core, what's duplicate, what's dead
  • Auditing third-party dependencies embedded directly in source (not declared in package managers)
  • Preparing architecture decision records for monorepo reorganization

Installation

# Clone first so the pinned commit can be reviewed before installation
set -euo pipefail

REPO_SCAN_COMMIT=2742664ebcad1450c208eda0ae45d3c17fad5dd8
REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR="${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/skills/repo-scan"
REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT="$(dirname "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR")"
mkdir -p "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT"
REPO_SCAN_TMP="$(mktemp -d "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT/.repo-scan-install.XXXXXX")"
REPO_SCAN_TOKEN="${REPO_SCAN_TMP##*.}"
REPO_SCAN_STAGE="$REPO_SCAN_TMP/stage-$REPO_SCAN_TOKEN"
REPO_SCAN_BACKUP="$REPO_SCAN_TMP/backup-$REPO_SCAN_TOKEN"
REPO_SCAN_LOCK="$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_PARENT/.repo-scan-install.lock"
REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=0
REPO_SCAN_LOCK_HELD=0
REPO_SCAN_MV_HAS_NO_TARGET=0
cleanup_repo_scan_install() {
  if [ "$REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP" -eq 0 ]; then
    rm -rf -- "$REPO_SCAN_TMP"
  fi
  if [ "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK_HELD" -eq 1 ] && ! rmdir -- "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK"; then
    printf 'Could not release installation lock at %s\n' "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK" >&2
  fi
}
trap cleanup_repo_scan_install EXIT
mkdir "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-source"
if mv -T -- "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-source" \
  "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-destination" 2>/dev/null; then
  REPO_SCAN_MV_HAS_NO_TARGET=1
  rmdir "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-destination"
else
  rmdir "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/mv-probe-source"
fi
move_repo_scan_dir() {
  REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE=$1
  REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION=$2
  REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME=${REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE##*/}
  if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION" ]; then
    return 1
  fi
  if [ "$REPO_SCAN_MV_HAS_NO_TARGET" -eq 1 ]; then
    mv -T -- "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE" "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION"
    return
  fi
  if ! mv -- "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE" "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION"; then
    return 1
  fi
  if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" ] || \
    [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" ]; then
    if ! mv -- "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" \
      "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_SOURCE"; then
      REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=1
      printf 'Move conflict recovery failed; staged data remains at %s\n' \
        "$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_DESTINATION/$REPO_SCAN_MOVE_NAME" >&2
    fi
    return 1
  fi
}

git clone --filter=blob:none --no-checkout \
  https://github.com/haibindev/repo-scan.git "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source"
git -C "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source" checkout --detach "$REPO_SCAN_COMMIT"
mkdir -p "$REPO_SCAN_STAGE"
git -C "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source" archive "$REPO_SCAN_COMMIT" | \
  tar -xf - -C "$REPO_SCAN_STAGE"

# Review "$REPO_SCAN_TMP/source" before approving installation.
printf 'Type install to replace %s after reviewing the pinned source: ' \
  "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" >&2
read -r REPO_SCAN_CONFIRM
if [ "$REPO_SCAN_CONFIRM" != install ]; then
  printf 'Installation cancelled.\n' >&2
  exit 1
fi
if ! mkdir -- "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK" 2>/dev/null; then
  printf 'Another repo-scan installation holds the lock at %s\n' \
    "$REPO_SCAN_LOCK" >&2
  exit 1
fi
REPO_SCAN_LOCK_HELD=1

if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ]; then
  move_repo_scan_dir "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP"
fi
if ! move_repo_scan_dir "$REPO_SCAN_STAGE" "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR"; then
  if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" ]; then
    if [ -e "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ] || [ -L "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR" ]; then
      REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=1
      printf 'Replacement failed and target was recreated; previous installation preserved at %s\n' \
        "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" >&2
    elif ! move_repo_scan_dir "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" "$REPO_SCAN_INSTALL_DIR"; then
      REPO_SCAN_KEEP_TMP=1
      printf 'Replacement and rollback failed; previous installation preserved at %s\n' \
        "$REPO_SCAN_BACKUP" >&2
    fi
  fi
  exit 1
fi

Review the source before installing any agent skill.

Installation completes only the bootstrap. Reload your agent harness, then invoke repo-scan again. This ECC pointer installs the external skill but does not run a scan itself.

Core Capabilities

CapabilityDescription
Cross-stack scanningC/C++, Java/Android, iOS (OC/Swift), Web (TS/JS/Vue) in one pass
File classificationEvery file tagged as project code, third-party, or build artifact
Library detection50+ known libraries (FFmpeg, Boost, OpenSSL…) with version extraction
Four-level verdictsCore Asset / Extract & Merge / Rebuild / Deprecate
HTML reportsInteractive dark-theme pages with drill-down navigation
Monorepo supportHierarchical scanning with summary + sub-project reports

Analysis Depth Levels

LevelFiles ReadUse Case
fast1-2 per moduleQuick inventory of huge directories
standard2-5 per moduleDefault audit with full dependency + architecture checks
deep5-10 per moduleAdds thread safety, memory management, API consistency
fullAll filesPre-merge comprehensive review

How It Works

  1. Classify the repo surface: enumerate files, then tag each as project code, embedded third-party code, or build artifact.
  2. Detect embedded libraries: inspect directory names, headers, license files, and version markers to identify bundled dependencies and likely versions.
  3. Score each module: group files by module or subsystem, then assign one of the four verdicts based on ownership, duplication, and maintenance cost.
  4. Highlight structural risks: call out dead-weight artifacts, duplicated wrappers, outdated vendored code, and modules that should be extracted, rebuilt, or deprecated.
  5. Produce the report: return a concise summary plus the interactive HTML output with per-module drill-down so the audit can be reviewed asynchronously.

Examples

On a 50,000-file C++ monorepo:

  • Found FFmpeg 2.x (2015 vintage) still in production
  • Discovered the same SDK wrapper duplicated 3 times
  • Identified 636 MB of committed Debug/ipch/obj build artifacts
  • Classified: 3 MB project code vs 596 MB third-party

Best Practices

  • Start with standard depth for first-time audits
  • Use fast for monorepos with 100+ modules to get a quick inventory
  • Run deep incrementally on modules flagged for refactoring
  • Review the cross-module analysis for duplicate detection across sub-projects

Links

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill