Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

swift-actor-persistence

Design local data storage in Swift using actors, which control concurrent access to shared data. Combine an in-memory cache with JSON file storage, implement save and lookup operations, and connect the repository to an observable ViewModel.

OriginalShow the original description

Thread-safe data persistence in Swift using actors — in-memory cache with file-backed storage, eliminating data races by design. Use when persisting data in Swift and a data race or thread-safety problem needs designing out.

See how to install

Good for

  • Building local storage for an iOS or macOS app
  • Designing local storage for an offline-first app
  • Replacing lock-based synchronization with Swift actors
  • Connecting stored data to an observable ViewModel

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Swift Actors for Thread-Safe Persistence

Patterns for building thread-safe data persistence layers using Swift actors. Combines in-memory caching with file-backed storage, leveraging the actor model to eliminate data races at compile time.

When to Activate

  • Building a data persistence layer in Swift 5.5+
  • Need thread-safe access to shared mutable state
  • Want to eliminate manual synchronization (locks, DispatchQueues)
  • Building offline-first apps with local storage

Core Pattern

Actor-Based Repository

The actor model guarantees serialized access — no data races, enforced by the compiler.

public actor LocalRepository<T: Codable & Identifiable> where T.ID == String {
    private var cache: [String: T] = [:]
    private let fileURL: URL

    public init(directory: URL = .documentsDirectory, filename: String = "data.json") {
        self.fileURL = directory.appendingPathComponent(filename)
        // Synchronous load during init (actor isolation not yet active)
        self.cache = Self.loadSynchronously(from: fileURL)
    }

    // MARK: - Public API

    public func save(_ item: T) throws {
        cache[item.id] = item
        try persistToFile()
    }

    public func delete(_ id: String) throws {
        cache[id] = nil
        try persistToFile()
    }

    public func find(by id: String) -> T? {
        cache[id]
    }

    public func loadAll() -> [T] {
        Array(cache.values)
    }

    // MARK: - Private

    private func persistToFile() throws {
        let data = try JSONEncoder().encode(Array(cache.values))
        try data.write(to: fileURL, options: .atomic)
    }

    private static func loadSynchronously(from url: URL) -> [String: T] {
        guard let data = try? Data(contentsOf: url),
              let items = try? JSONDecoder().decode([T].self, from: data) else {
            return [:]
        }
        return Dictionary(uniqueKeysWithValues: items.map { ($0.id, $0) })
    }
}

Usage

All calls are automatically async due to actor isolation:

let repository = LocalRepository<Question>()

// Read — fast O(1) lookup from in-memory cache
let question = await repository.find(by: "q-001")
let allQuestions = await repository.loadAll()

// Write — updates cache and persists to file atomically
try await repository.save(newQuestion)
try await repository.delete("q-001")

Combining with @Observable ViewModel

@Observable
final class QuestionListViewModel {
    private(set) var questions: [Question] = []
    private let repository: LocalRepository<Question>

    init(repository: LocalRepository<Question> = LocalRepository()) {
        self.repository = repository
    }

    func load() async {
        questions = await repository.loadAll()
    }

    func add(_ question: Question) async throws {
        try await repository.save(question)
        questions = await repository.loadAll()
    }
}

Key Design Decisions

DecisionRationale
Actor (not class + lock)Compiler-enforced thread safety, no manual synchronization
In-memory cache + file persistenceFast reads from cache, durable writes to disk
Synchronous init loadingAvoids async initialization complexity
Dictionary keyed by IDO(1) lookups by identifier
Generic over Codable & IdentifiableReusable across any model type
Atomic file writes (.atomic)Prevents partial writes on crash

Best Practices

  • Use Sendable types for all data crossing actor boundaries
  • Keep the actor's public API minimal — only expose domain operations, not persistence details
  • Use .atomic writes to prevent data corruption if the app crashes mid-write
  • Load synchronously in init — async initializers add complexity with minimal benefit for local files
  • Combine with @Observable ViewModels for reactive UI updates

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Using DispatchQueue or NSLock instead of actors for new Swift concurrency code
  • Exposing the internal cache dictionary to external callers
  • Making the file URL configurable without validation
  • Forgetting that all actor method calls are await — callers must handle async context
  • Using nonisolated to bypass actor isolation (defeats the purpose)

When to Use

  • Local data storage in iOS/macOS apps (user data, settings, cached content)
  • Offline-first architectures that sync to a server later
  • Any shared mutable state that multiple parts of the app access concurrently
  • Replacing legacy DispatchQueue-based thread safety with modern Swift concurrency

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummaryAI rating 80

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

agent-introspection-debugging

FreeSummaryAI rating 100

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.5KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill