Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

team-builder

Browse available specialist agents by domain, select up to five, and run them independently on the same task in parallel. Receive a combined report showing each agent’s findings, shared conclusions, conflicting recommendations, and suggested next steps.

OriginalShow the original description

Interactive picker that discovers available agent personas via the claude agents command and agents/ markdown globs, groups them into domains, has the user select up to five, dispatches them in parallel on one task, and synthesizes agreements and conflicts into a unified report. Use when composing a team of agents, browsing available agent personas, or running several specialist agents in parallel.

See how to install

Good for

  • Browsing available specialist agents
  • Selecting agents from different domains
  • Reviewing a site for security and SEO before launch
  • Comparing recommendations from several agents

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Team Builder

Interactive menu for browsing and composing agent teams on demand. Works with flat or domain-subdirectory agent collections.

When to Use

  • You have multiple agent personas (markdown files) and want to pick which ones to use for a task
  • You want to compose an ad-hoc team from different domains (e.g., Security + SEO + Architecture)
  • You want to browse what agents are available before deciding

Prerequisites

Agent files must be markdown files containing a persona prompt (identity, rules, workflow, deliverables). The first # Heading is used as the agent name and the first paragraph as the description.

Both flat and subdirectory layouts are supported:

Subdirectory layout — domain is inferred from the folder name:

agents/
├── engineering/
│   ├── security-engineer.md
│   └── software-architect.md
├── marketing/
│   └── seo-specialist.md
└── sales/
    └── discovery-coach.md

Flat layout — domain inferred from shared filename prefixes. A prefix counts as a domain when 2+ files share it. Files with unique prefixes go to "General". Note: the algorithm splits at the first -, so multi-word domains (e.g., product-management) should use the subdirectory layout instead:

agents/
├── engineering-security-engineer.md
├── engineering-software-architect.md
├── marketing-seo-specialist.md
├── marketing-content-strategist.md
├── sales-discovery-coach.md
└── sales-outbound-strategist.md

Configuration

Agents are discovered via two methods, merged and deduplicated by agent name:

  1. claude agents command (primary) — run claude agents to get all agents known to the CLI, including user agents, plugin agents (e.g. ecc:architect), and built-in agents. This automatically covers ECC marketplace installs without any path configuration.
  2. File glob (fallback, for reading agent content) — agent markdown files are read from:
    • ./agents/**/*.md + ./agents/*.md — project-local agents
    • ~/.claude/agents/**/*.md + ~/.claude/agents/*.md — global user agents

Earlier sources take precedence when names collide: user agents > plugin agents > built-in agents. A custom path can be used instead if the user specifies one.

How It Works

Step 1: Discover Available Agents

Run claude agents to get the full agent list. Parse each line:

  • Plugin agents are prefixed with plugin-name: (e.g., ecc:security-reviewer). Use the part after : as the agent name and the plugin name as the domain.
  • User agents have no prefix. Read the corresponding markdown file from ~/.claude/agents/ or ./agents/ to extract the name and description.
  • Built-in agents (e.g., Explore, Plan) are skipped unless the user explicitly asks to include them.

For user agents loaded from markdown files:

  • Subdirectory layout: extract the domain from the parent folder name
  • Flat layout: collect all filename prefixes (text before the first -). A prefix qualifies as a domain only if it appears in 2 or more filenames (e.g., engineering-security-engineer.md and engineering-software-architect.md both start with engineering → Engineering domain). Files with unique prefixes (e.g., code-reviewer.md, tdd-guide.md) are grouped under "General"
  • Extract the agent name from the first # Heading. If no heading is found, derive the name from the filename (strip .md, replace hyphens with spaces, title-case)
  • Extract a one-line summary from the first paragraph after the heading

If no agents are found after running claude agents and probing file locations, inform the user: "No agents found. Run claude agents to verify your setup." Then stop.

Step 2: Present Domain Menu

Available agent domains:
1. Engineering — Software Architect, Security Engineer
2. Marketing — SEO Specialist
3. Sales — Discovery Coach, Outbound Strategist

Pick domains or name specific agents (e.g., "1,3" or "security + seo"):
  • Skip domains with zero agents (empty directories)
  • Show agent count per domain

Step 3: Handle Selection

Accept flexible input:

  • Numbers: "1,3" selects all agents from Engineering and Sales
  • Names: "security + seo" fuzzy-matches against discovered agents
  • "all from engineering" selects every agent in that domain

If more than 5 agents are selected, list them alphabetically and ask the user to narrow down: "You selected N agents (max 5). Pick which to keep, or say 'first 5' to use the first five alphabetically."

Confirm selection:

Selected: Security Engineer + SEO Specialist
What should they work on? (describe the task):

Step 4: Spawn Agents in Parallel

  1. Read each selected agent's markdown file
  2. Prompt for the task description if not already provided
  3. Spawn all agents in parallel using the Agent tool:
    • subagent_type: "general-purpose"
    • prompt: "{agent file content}\n\nTask: {task description}"
    • Each agent runs independently — no inter-agent communication needed
  4. If an agent fails (error, timeout, or empty output), note the failure inline (e.g., "Security Engineer: failed — [reason]") and continue with results from agents that succeeded

Step 5: Synthesize Results

Collect all outputs and present a unified report:

  • Results grouped by agent
  • Synthesis section highlighting:
    • Agreements across agents
    • Conflicts or tensions between recommendations
    • Recommended next steps

If only 1 agent was selected, skip synthesis and present the output directly.

Rules

  • Dynamic discovery only. Never hardcode agent lists. New files in the directory auto-appear in the menu.
  • Max 5 agents per team. More than 5 produces diminishing returns and excessive token usage. Enforce at selection time.
  • Parallel dispatch. All agents run simultaneously — use the Agent tool's parallel invocation pattern.
  • Parallel Agent calls, not TeamCreate. This skill uses parallel Agent tool calls for independent work. TeamCreate (a Claude Code tool for multi-agent dialogue) is only needed when agents must debate or respond to each other.

Examples

User: team builder

Claude:
Available agent domains:
1. Engineering (2) — Software Architect, Security Engineer
2. Marketing (1) — SEO Specialist
3. Sales (4) — Discovery Coach, Outbound Strategist, Proposal Strategist, Sales Engineer
4. Support (1) — Executive Summary

Pick domains or name specific agents:

User: security + seo

Claude:
Selected: Security Engineer + SEO Specialist
What should they work on?

User: Review my Next.js e-commerce site before launch

[Both agents spawn in parallel, each applying their specialty to the codebase]

Claude:
## Security Engineer Findings
- [findings...]

## SEO Specialist Findings
- [findings...]

## Synthesis
Both agents agree on: [...]
Tension: Security recommends CSP that blocks inline styles, SEO needs inline schema markup. Resolution: [...]
Next steps: [...]

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

accessibility

FreeSummary

Design and audit interfaces for Web, iOS, and Android using WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidance. Check screen-reader labels, keyboard navigation, contrast, and control sizes to identify barriers and guide implementation for people using assistive technology.

  • Adding descriptive labels to icon-only buttons
  • Reviewing keyboard navigation and modal focus
  • Checking contrast and control sizes
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Investigate unreliable AI agents across 12 layers, including instructions, memory, tool execution, and display. Use code and logs to trace failures, rank findings by severity, and produce an ordered repair plan that prioritizes code changes.

  • Investigating failures that appear only inside an agent application
  • Tracing old conversation content leaking into new sessions
  • Checking skipped or falsely claimed tool execution
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

agent-eval

FreeSummary

Compare coding agents on tasks from your own codebase. Define success checks, run agents in separate Git working directories, and report pass rates, available API costs, completion time, and consistency across repeated trials.

  • Comparing coding agents on real development tasks
  • Evaluating a new tool or model before adoption
  • Checking performance after agent updates
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Design and refine an AI agent’s available actions, tool inputs, and result formats. Define recovery steps for errors, manage the information kept in context, and evaluate changes through completion rates, retries, and cost per successful task.

  • Define an AI agent’s tool set and input formats
  • Make tool results and next steps easier to interpret
  • Specify safe retries and stopping conditions
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose failed AI agent runs by capturing errors, checking likely causes, and choosing small, reversible recovery actions. The workflow produces a structured report of the failure, recovery steps, and evidence, helping explain repeated retries or stalled progress.

  • Diagnosing repeated tool calls with no progress
  • Investigating quality loss as context grows
  • Checking file paths and environment mismatches
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Diagnose AI agent runs that fail repeatedly, loop through tools, or lose track of the task. Capture errors and environment details, test a focused recovery action, and produce a report explaining the evidence and outcome.

  • Diagnosing repeated failures in an agent run
  • Investigating loops through the same tool calls
  • Reviewing output degradation as context grows
affaan-m/ECC283.4KUpdated Oct 5, 2026

See all skills by affaan-m

Report a problem with this skill