Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

acr-measurement

Use when constructing or auditing accounting measures for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — discretionary accruals (modified Jones), real earnings management (Roychowdhury), conservatism (Basu / C-Score), comparability, disclosure indices, audit-quality and tax-avoidance proxies — so each measure is built transparently and reproducibly. Use before identification.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

会计度量构造(acr-measurement)

触发时机

  • 直接用现成指标(如 DA、KV 指数)却不交代如何估计/分年分行业
  • 盈余管理只用单一代理变量,无替代度量
  • 度量的样本、估计窗口、回归设定、缩尾未说明
  • 审稿人质疑"度量不规范 / 不可复现 / 不够会计味"

核心原则:度量要"会计味"且透明可复现

本刊审稿人会逐项检查会计度量的构造。每个度量都要说明:估计模型、估计粒度(分年×分行业)、样本要求、缩尾/标准化、符号方向。不能只丢一个变量名。

常用度量与构造要点

盈余管理 / 应计

  • 可操纵性应计(修正 Jones 模型):分年度×分行业(通常≥10 或 15 个观测)回归总应计对 (ΔREV−ΔREC)、PPE,取残差;说明总应计是资产负债表法还是现金流量表法。
  • Dechow-Dichev / 修正 DD:应计对前后期经营现金流回归,残差波动度量应计质量。
  • 真实盈余管理(Roychowdhury):异常经营现金流、异常生产成本、异常酌量性费用三项及其合成;说明方向(正常 vs 操纵)。
  • 多度量并用,主结果与稳健性互证。

会计稳健性

  • Basu 条件稳健性:盈余对收益(正/负)的非对称及时性回归。
  • C-Score(Khan-Watts):基于 Basu 框架按公司年估计的稳健性得分,说明系数估计与拼装。

信息含量 / 可比性

  • 会计可比性(De Franco et al.):同行业配对的盈余—收益映射差异。
  • 价值相关性 / 盈余反应系数:说明事件窗口与异常收益算法。

披露 / 信息

  • 披露指数:自建指数须给编码手册、条目清单、评分规则、双人编码一致性(如 Kappa);用现成指数(如 KV、年报可读性、MD&A 文本指标)须给来源与算法。

审计 / 税收

  • 审计质量代理:Big4/国内十大、行业专长、任期、是否出具非标意见——说明各自度量的局限。
  • 税收规避:实际税率(ETR)、现金 ETR、会计—税收差异(BTD)、扣除盈余管理后的 BTD(DDBTD)——说明分母处理与异常值。

自检清单

  • 每个度量给出估计模型与估计粒度(分年×分行业)
  • 样本最低观测数、缩尾(如 1%/99%)、标准化说明清楚
  • 符号与方向解释明确(值大代表什么)
  • 主度量 + 至少一个替代度量(为稳健性铺路)
  • 自建指数有编码手册与编码一致性
  • 度量与会计议题、信息机制对得上

反模式

  • "我们用修正 Jones 模型计算 DA"——不说分年分行业、样本要求、总应计口径
  • 盈余管理只用一个 DA,无真实盈余管理或替代
  • 披露指数无条目清单与编码规则,无法复现
  • 用现成数据库指标当黑箱,不交代算法与局限

本刊会计度量的审稿期待(决策表)

《会计研究》由中国会计学会主办,是 CSSCI 唯一权威顶级会计学期刊,审稿人会逐项核验盈余管理 DA、会计稳健性、信息披露质量等代理变量的构造与争议。下表对齐审稿期待与退稿模式:

审稿期待达标线常见退稿模式
估计粒度透明DA 分年×分行业、≥10/15 观测门槛只写"用修正 Jones 算 DA"
多度量互证主度量 + ≥1 替代(应计↔真实)盈余管理只用单一 DA
自建指数可复现编码手册、条目清单、Kappa披露指数无编码规则

微型走查:盈余管理 DA 构造(数字示意)

虚构稿用可操纵性应计衡量盈余管理,构造走查(示意):模型与粒度——修正 Jones,按证监会行业门类×年度回归、每组 ≥15 观测,取残差为 DA;总应计口径——现金流量表法(净利润−经营现金流),稳健性用资产负债表法互验;方向与缩尾——连续变量上下 1% 缩尾,|DA| 越大盈余管理越强,正负向分别讨论增/减利润操纵;替代度量——真实盈余管理(Roychowdhury 三分量合成),主结果 |DA| 系数 −0.014(t≈2.3),替代度量下方向一致。

上述系数与门槛为演示构造规范的示意值,非真实估计。

审稿人追问与本刊语境修法

  • 问"DA 怎么估的、分年分行业了吗" → 补估计粒度、最低观测门槛、总应计口径,逐项写清。
  • 问"只有一个 DA 够吗" → 加真实盈余管理或 Dechow-Dichev 替代,主结果与稳健性互证。
  • 问"披露指数能复现吗" → 附编码手册、条目清单、双人编码一致性(Kappa)。

校准锚点

本刊已刊论文多在正文给变量定义表、交代度量估计细节。是否要求提交度量计算代码或中间变量,以编辑部最新稿约为准。

输出格式

【主度量】<名称 + 模型 + 估计粒度>
【构造透明度】模型□ 粒度□ 样本□ 缩尾□ 方向□
【替代度量】<≥1 个,用于稳健性>
【自建指数】编码手册□ 一致性(Kappa)□(如适用)
【与机制对齐】<度量↔信息机制>
【下一步】acr-identification

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill